Simple research view

AIQ

$62.94 +1.04% Oct 26 close

Detected setup Cup & Handle · Setup Score 94/100

Stand aside — setup invalidated

Setup score 94, but price closes below stop $63.95 — stand aside until the condition resets.

Ask about AIQ

Switch to Advanced for indicator panels, raw grades, provenance, drawing tools, and full technical tables.

$AIQ

etf Stage 2 · Advancing Base 1

$62.94 latest close

Market Structure

Trend structure: downtrend

Latest event: structure_shift (bearish)

Support 48.05–48.34 · 5 touches · strong

Support 50.80–50.87 · 3 touches · moderate

Resistance 64.71–65.04 · 3 touches · moderate

Join to Watchlist $AIQ Share card

Historical record

No active setup in the latest scan — this page shows the last detection Legend AI made for $AIQ. Every level, score and criterion below is computed from the Oct 26 close session (latest session), and may no longer hold.

Historical verdict · setup score 94/100 · data Oct 26 close · latest session

Stand aside — setup invalidated

Setup score 94, but price closes below stop $63.95 — stand aside until the condition resets.

Review six verdicts Inspect chart

Recent price action · daily

What would change this verdict

What needs to turn for this to become buyable — the top failing checks across the legend council:

Minervini 1.5 Price > 50-day MA — Price $62.94 vs MA50 $64.31
O'Neil M: Market in confirmed uptrend — Market phase: uptrend_under_pressure
O'Neil S: Volume ≥ 40% above average on breakout
Weinstein Volume expansion above average — Volume ratio 0.79x
Dennis S1: 20-day Donchian breakout
Dennis S2: 55-day Donchian breakout

Minority view — the council disagrees here

Minervini: avoid Trend-template read: fails Price > 50-day MA.
O'Neil: watch CANSLIM read: 3/6 pass; improvement is still needed.
Weinstein: watch Stage-analysis read: Stage 2 is present; 1 supporting checks need improvement.

73 Strong

Legend Score · rates the stock Strong (73/100) — held back by institutional footprint

Our proprietary 0-100 rating — the answer to Wall Street's black-box scores. Five pillars, each computed from real scan data, each explained below in plain English.

Relative Strength (25%) 81
Trend Template (25%) 100
Institutional Footprint (20%) 62
EPS Growth (15%) 50
Quality (SMR-like) (15%) 50

RS rank 80: beating most of the market. Trend template 8/8: price above rising 50/150/200-day lines — textbook uptrend structure. Institutional score 62: mild accumulation. No recent earnings growth data — scored neutral. No sales/ROE data — scored neutral. Updated 2026-10-14.

Price $62.94 +1.0% Oct 26 close

52W High $70.26 10.4% below high

Wks Since High 20w

Base Depth 20.4%

RS Rank 57 percentile of scan

SMA 50 $64.31

Avg Vol 1,186,589

Rel Vol (Oct 26) 0.79× 0.98× on up days

More stats

52W Low $44.46

Tight Wks 4 1 today

Base B1

SMA 200 $58.39

RS Line vs High -8.3%

RS Line Slope +1.3% ▲

ADR% 1.6%

ATR(14) $1.39 (2.2%)

Vol Pace (live) N/A

A/D Days 17A / 7D

A/D Rating A+

VDU Bars 0/10 d

Position in 52-week range 72ndpercentile of the 52-week range

$44.46low

$70.26high

AIQ Chart

Interactive price, volume, RS, RSI, and MACD charts are available after sign in.

Create a free account to load the full interactive chart for AIQ.

Create Free Account

Technical Analysis Report Card

$AIQ · $62.94 · as of 2026-10-26 · multi-factor read

/ 100

Technicals 50/100

Reference read from price & volume only — the verdict at the top of the page decides the action.

Trend · Daily / Weekly / Monthly

Daily ▬ Sideways / consolidating

Weekly ▬ Sideways / consolidating

Monthly ▬ Sideways / consolidating

Moving Averages

50-day$64.31 ↓

100-day$63.37 ↓

200-day$58.39 ↑

Bullish (50 > 200)

RSI (14)

Reading43.8 · Bearish

Bearish momentum — sellers in control.

MACD (12/26/9)

StateBearish

Histogram-0.362

Bearish — MACD below its signal line and below zero. Histogram expanding.

Bollinger Bands (20,2)

%B / Width24% · 10.5%

Mid-band — no directional band edge in play.

Volume · Buyer vs Seller

Up/Down vol0.98 · Neutral

Rel volume0.79×

Pocket pivots · 10d2

5d vs 50d vol146%

Heavy vol up / down1 / 1

Balanced — up/down volume is roughly even; no clear hand. Recent volume is expanding versus its baseline.

Pocket pivot 1 session ago — up-day volume beat every down day of the prior 10 sessions.
1 heavy-volume up day vs 1 down in the last 20 sessions.

Support & Resistance

R · $64.95swing level

R · $67.45swing level

R · $70.2652-week high

Price · $62.94now

S · $62.15swing level

S · $60.55swing level

S · $59.49swing level

Fibonacci · Downtrend swing

23.6%$59.30

38.2%$61.40

50.0% ◄ price here$63.09

61.8%$64.78

78.6%$67.19

Retracement resistance zones measured from the recent swing high down to the low.

The verdict is free. The trade plan is Pro.

Unlock the exact entry, stop-loss, profit target, and reward-to-risk for AIQ — plus the full 500+ symbol scanner and Ask-the-Legends chat.

Start your 7-day free trial →

Above 200-day MA50/200 bullishRS 80 (leader)

Want this read in a legend's voice? Ask a Legend about AIQ

Generic technical analysis generated mechanically from price & volume — educational research only, not financial advice or a personalized recommendation. Levels are illustrative; confirm on your own chart. New to these terms? →

Legend Verdicts 6 methodology checks

Who would consider this setup, why it qualifies, and what blocks it — calculated from the same deterministic methodology rules used across Legend AI.
How to read the numbers: the setup score (94/100, in the verdict band) rates this trade setup. Each legend's A–D grade rates the same setup against that legend's own checklist — so a high score next to a C grade is not a contradiction. The setup can be strong without fitting that legend's style. When the council disagrees, the verdict band breaks the tie.

Council consensus: 8 of 9 legends are Watching — building, not yet a confirmed buy.

Minervini Avoid A Trend-template read: fails Price > 50-day MA.

partialRule check says AVOID (8/9 checks passed) — Trend-template read: fails Price > 50-day MA.

Passing evidence

1.1 Price > 150-day MA AND 200-day MAPrice $62.94, MA150 $61.03, MA200 $58.39

1.2 150-day MA > 200-day MAMA150 $61.03 vs MA200 $58.39

Failing evidence

1.5 Price > 50-day MAPrice $62.94 vs MA50 $64.31

Not applicable

2. Quarterly EPS growth ≥ 25%No single-company earnings — not applicable to ETFs

2. ROE ≥ 17%No single-company earnings — not applicable to ETFs

2. Revenue growth ≥ 20% YoYNo single-company earnings — not applicable to ETFs

8/9 checks

Method → Playbook → Ask →

O'Neil Watch D CANSLIM read: 3/6 pass; improvement is still needed.

mediumCup & Handle still forming — ideal buy point at $66.92 on big volume. CANSLIM 76.

Passing evidence

L: RS rank ≥ 80 (IBD leadership)RS rank 80

N: Near 52-week high or RS line new high10.4% below high | RS line new high: False

Failing evidence

M: Market in confirmed uptrendMarket phase: uptrend_under_pressure

S: Volume ≥ 40% above average on breakoutNot confirmed

Not applicable

C: Quarterly EPS acceleration ≥ 25%No single-company earnings — not applicable to ETFs

A: Annual earnings & revenue qualityNo single-company earnings — not applicable to ETFs

3/6 checks

Method → Playbook → Ask →

Weinstein Watch B Stage-analysis read: Stage 2 is present; 1 supporting checks need improvement.

mediumClassic Stage 2 advancing phase — strong weekly trend confirms uptrend. This is Weinstein's sweet spot: buy and hold while price remains above the 30-week MA.

Passing evidence

Stage 2 (Advancing phase) confirmedStage 2 (Advancing)

Price above 30-week MA (200-day proxy)Price $62.94 vs MA200 $58.39

Failing evidence

Volume expansion above averageVolume ratio 0.79x

6/7 checks

Method → Playbook → Ask →

dennis Watch C Turtle read: no Donchian signal. The system stays flat until price takes out the 20-day high.

Passing evidence

No breakdown below the 20-day channel20-day low $61.68

Volatility-unit sizing (1N ≈ 1% of equity)1N = $1.23 (1.96% of price); the Turtles size 1 unit so a 1N move ≈ 1% of equity, making the 2N stop ≈ 2% equity risk

Failing evidence

S1: 20-day Donchian breakoutNot confirmed

S2: 55-day Donchian breakoutNot confirmed

5/7 checks

Method → Playbook → Ask →

zanger Watch B Zanger read: the structure is fine but the breakout quality is not there yet — wait for 150%+ volume on the break.

partialZanger would buy the Cup & Handle breakout only with 150-200% volume, never more than 5% above the breakout point, with a 2-3% stop set at entry. His edge over O'Neil is the exit plan: sell 20-30% of the position at +15-20%, then trail the rest on the 10/20-day moving average.

Passing evidence

Named Zanger pattern onlyCup & Handle

Not extended (≤5% above the breakout point)Measured as passing

Failing evidence

Breakout volume 1.5-2.0x averageData unavailable

5/6 checks

Method → Playbook → Ask →

zweig Watch A Zweig read: passes his full growth screen — earnings growing faster than the market, a price that is reasonable for that growth, insiders buying, and price strength. Super Model timing — timing tailwinds: Breadth momentum, 4% Model (breadth proxy); 2 timing leg(s) lack data.

Passing evidence

Price strength (RS ≥ 70)RS score 80 — Zweig buys strength, not bargains

Breadth momentum: 10-day A/D ratio10-day A/D 1.17 (2025 adv / 1725 dec) — participation expanding

Failing evidence

Monetary conditions: don't fight the FedFed series stored but too thin to read direction

9-to-1 up/down volume daysOnly 17 breadth sessions stored — need 20+ to spot thrust days

Not applicable

EPS growth above the marketNo single-company earnings — not applicable to ETFs

Reasonable price for the growthNo single-company earnings — not applicable to ETFs

Insider buyingNo single-company earnings — not applicable to ETFs

3/5 checks

Method → Playbook → Ask →

Livermore Watch B Pivotal-point read: constructive evidence is present, but volume vs average is unresolved.

Passing evidence

Price$62.94

Relative strengthRS 80

Failing evidence

Volume vs average0.79x

Pivotal point cleared on expanding volumeNot confirmed

4/6 checks

Method → Playbook → Ask →

Darvas Watch B Box-theory read: constructive evidence is present, but volume vs average is unresolved.

mediumBuilding the top of the box (6.3% from 52W high) — watch for a box breakout with volume expansion.

Passing evidence

Price$62.94

Relative strengthRS 80

Failing evidence

Volume vs average0.79x

Box top broken on heavy volumeNot confirmed

4/6 checks

Method → Playbook → Ask →

Wyckoff Watch B Supply-and-demand read: constructive evidence is present, but volume vs average is unresolved.

Passing evidence

Price$62.94

Relative strengthRS 80

Failing evidence

Volume vs average0.79x

Sign of Strength confirmed on expanding volumePrice hasn't cleared the pivot yet — confirmation pending

4/6 checks

Method → Playbook → Ask →

Base & Breakout

Breakout follow-through

No active breakout tracked — Legend AI monitors daily for pivot-point breaks. What's a breakout?

Unlock Base & Breakout Tracking

RS Line vs SPY 52-week relative strength · blue = RS line · dashed = MA50 · dot = NH ▲ Rising

Accumulation / Distribution last 65 sessions · green = acc on high vol · red = dist on high vol Net +2 A+

Minervini · Grade Card

Fundamentals & leadership quality — Minervini’s published criteria · 3/3 met · earnings criteria N/A for ETFs

A+ 3/3 criteria

Separate score from the Minervini Trend Template (7/8): the Trend Template grades the price structure, this grades the company & leadership (earnings, sales, margins, RS rank). A stock can ride a clean trend while its fundamentals lag, so the two often differ by design — they are not the same checklist.

– EPS acceleration ≥25% QoQ N/A

– Revenue growth ≥20% YoY N/A

– Gross margin ≥30% N/A

– ROE ≥17% N/A

✓ RS rating ≥80 (leadership) 80

✓ Stage 2 uptrend (Weinstein) Stage 2

✓ Within 25% of 52W high -10.4%

Method Playbook

Trade it like Minervini EXACT LEVELS · PRO

Minervini O'Neil Livermore Weinstein Darvas Wyckoff

Minervini A · Avoid — The deterministic methodology check is Avoid; wait until the blocking criteria are resolved.

Pivot

Pro level

Published-method rule: Use the tight base's structural pivot; the setup must retain Trend Template leadership into the trigger.
Evidence: Canonical setup geometry is available with Pro.

Entry trigger

Pro level

Published-method rule: Require a decisive move through the pivot with volume confirmation, and do not initiate more than 5% above it.
Evidence: Canonical setup geometry is available with Pro.

Initial stop

Pro level

Published-method rule: Start at the tighter structural invalidation; the initial loss limit must not exceed roughly 7–8% from entry.
Evidence: Canonical setup geometry is available with Pro.

Trail

Rule-based

Published-method rule: Hold the initial stop until the trade proves itself; near +1R move to breakeven, then trail a higher low or rising 10/21-day average once well extended.
Evidence: Planned management rule; no stored stop or broker order is changed automatically.

Exit / invalidation

Pro level

Published-method rule: Exit when the structural stop or a meaningful higher-low/short-term trend violation fires; never widen the stop.
Evidence: Canonical setup geometry is available with Pro.

Deterministic educational plan, not a recommendation. No order or stop is changed automatically. Method and sources →

The published-method workflow is public. Unlock exact pivot, entry, stop, target, and sizing with Pro →

Forming Patterns (predictive — not confirmed)

Head & Shoulders bearish forming

75% built

Possible head & shoulders top — not confirmed. Watch for a daily close below ~59.49 (neckline) to confirm, with measured-move risk toward ~48.72. A push back above 67.77 weakens the pattern; reclaiming 70.26 invalidates it.

Confirms below 59.49

Invalidates at 70.26

Left Shoulder 63.03

Head 70.26

Right Shoulder 67.77

Neckline 59.49

Target 48.72

LS 63.03 / head 70.26 / RS 67.77, neckline ~59.49, vol_fading=yes

Predictive pattern recognition is educational — most forming structures never confirm. Wait for the confirmation level before treating this as a setup.

Pattern Analysis (historical)

Cup & Handle

94 setup score

RS Score 80

Trend template 7/8

CANSLIM 75.6* (B)

19.6% cup depth 3.9% handle 6 sessions since breakout

Cup 19.6% deep from a $69.57 left rim to a $55.92 low
Rims 6.5% apart (ideal, within 10%)
Handle pulled back 3.9% over 4 bars from $66.85 to $64.27
Handle sits in the upper half of the cup
Rounded U-shaped bottom
Pivot $66.85 fixed at the handle high
Breakout: 6 bars since the first close above the pivot
Volume dried up in the handle

Raw detector evidence · confidence is a heuristic match score, not a probability

depth=19.6%, handle_pb=3.9%, lips_diff=6.5%, upper_half=yes, u_shape=yes, near_pivot=yes, orderly=yes | Strong trend (8/8) | Top RS (80) | High-confidence pattern (89%) | Power Trend | Stage 2 | Tight base (4 tight wks) | Readiness 85/100 (approaching) | CANSLIM 75.6 (B)
setup_key=cup_handle|2026-07-29|2026-08-28|66.85 · cup_handle/2026-10-03
anchors={"bottom": {"bar": 76, "bars_ago": 53, "date": "2026-07-29", "price": 55.92}, "breakout": {"bar": 124, "bars_ago": 5, "date": "2026-10-06", "price": 67.05}, "handle_high": {"bar": 114, "bars_ago": 15, "date": "2026-09-22", "price": 66.85}, "handle_low": {"bar": 118, "bars_ago": 11, "date": "2026-09-28", "price": 64.27}, "left_lip": {"bar": 36, "bars_ago": 93, "date": "2026-06-01", "price": 69.566}, "right_lip": {"bar": 98, "bars_ago": 31, "date": "2026-08-28", "price": 65.04}}

Why This Setup?

Cup & Handle · schematic

The Universal Edge Check · context only

What the setup still has going for it, recorded for later. The verdict above stands — these principles do not overrule it.

4/7 universals met

A relative-strength leader — not met RS rank 57 — laggard
Clear of earnings — partly met Report date unknown
Volume confirms — partly met 0.7× average — light
Asymmetric reward — met Met — levels are a Pro detail
In a confirmed uptrend — met Stage 2 · Trend template 7/8
Not chasing (in range) — met Met — levels are a Pro detail
Risk is defined — met Met — levels are a Pro detail

Why these seven? → The Universal Edge

Minervini Trend Template

7/8

Grades the price structure — moving-average stacking, distance from the 52-week high/low, and relative strength above the ≥70 uptrend bar. This is the technical trend check; the company's fundamentals and ≥80 RS leadership are scored separately in the Grade Card.

Price above SMA 150 & 200 $62.94 vs SMA150 $61.03 / SMA200 $58.39

SMA 150 above SMA 200 SMA150 $61.03 vs SMA200 $58.39

SMA 200 trending up Slope +1.35 over 20 days

SMA 50 above SMA 150 & 200 SMA50 $64.31

Price above SMA 50 $62.94 vs SMA50 $64.31

30%+ above 52-week low +41.6% from $44.46

Within 25% of 52-week high -10.4% from $70.26

RS score above 70 RS 80

Fundamentals

52W Range

72%

Insider

No Buy

Company

Company profile

AIQ

O'Neil · Grade Card

ETF checklist — N, S, L, M only

B 75.6* CANSLIM * disqualified on M

C · Curr. EPS

N/A

A · Annual EPS

N/A

N · New Highs

100

S · Supply/Demand

L · Leader RS

I · Inst. Spons.

N/A

M · Market

ETFs hold baskets of stocks — earnings and insider criteria don't apply. This grades new highs, supply/demand, relative-strength leadership, and market direction instead.

Weekly Context

Multi-timeframe signals from weekly bars

W. Trend

8/8

W. RS

W. Support

$49.20

W. Resist

$70.26

Weekly Structure

Trend Neutral

Tight Weeks 1

Confirmation Neutral

Scan History

Oct 14

Cup & Handle ✓ Gate

Oct 14

Cup & Handle ✓ Gate

93 -1.6%

Oct 13

Cup & Handle ✓ Gate

93 -4.4%

Oct 13

Cup & Handle ✓ Gate

92 -4.4%

Oct 12

Cup & Handle ✓ Gate

94 -4.5%

Oct 12

Cup & Handle ✓ Gate

93 -4.5%

Latest News

Headlines for AIQ

Loading headlines…

Get the full picture on AIQ

Pro members see entry/stop/target levels, R:R ratios, intraday alerts, and every setup detected across 500+ symbols daily.

Start 7-Day Free Trial