Head & Shoulders TopNeckline ~244.61 has broken. Measured-move risk extends toward ~-10.26; a fast reclaim of 244.61 would be a failed breakdown (often bullish).
Bearish structure on the daily chart — a heads-up for anyone holding, not a short signal. Does not affect the bullish setup score.
Market Structure
Trend structure:downtrend
Latest event:structure_shift(bullish)
Resistance
342.00–342.30
· 3 touches · moderate
Momentum Turn Watch
Bollinger Lower-Band SupportPrice ($223.27) is holding just above the lower Bollinger band ($213.98; %B 7) — support at the bottom of the bands.
Early technical context only. Wait for price, volume, and the canonical setup trigger to confirm; this signal does not change readiness or the setup score.
Triggers when price crosses your target during market hours or after the next daily scan. Delivered via email and Telegram (if linked in Account).
Historical record
No active setup in the latest scan — this page shows the last detection Legend AI made for $ALAB.
Every level, score and criterion below is computed from the Nov 04 close session (1 session old), and may no longer hold.
Historical verdict · setup score 78/100 · data Nov 04 close · 1 session old
Stand aside — setup invalidated
Setup score 78, but distribution days reach 5 or more — stand aside until the condition resets.
Weinstein: watchStage-analysis read: Stage 2 is present; 2 supporting checks need improvement.
72Strong
Legend Score · rates the stockStrong (72/100) — held back by quality (smr-like)
Our proprietary 0-100 rating — the answer to Wall Street's black-box scores. Five pillars, each computed from real scan data, each explained below in plain English.
Relative Strength (25%)93
Trend Template (25%)88
Institutional Footprint (20%)71
EPS Growth (15%)50
Quality (SMR-like) (15%)32
RS rank 92: top 8% of all stocks — true leadership. Trend template 7/8: price above rising 50/150/200-day lines — textbook uptrend structure. Institutional score 71: mild accumulation. No recent earnings growth data — scored neutral. Quality 32: weak fundamentals (sales growth 32).
Updated 2026-10-14.
Earnings
Normal technical setup
Next earnings
Tuesday, November 3, 2026After market close
Exact clock time not supplied by source
Deterministic evidence
Reported EPS 1.32
vs estimate 1.2149
· surprise +8.7%
ALAB-4.43%
Semiconductor proxy · SMH-2.75%
Broad market · SPY+1.65%
Same completed session window ending 2026-11-04.
ALAB was -1.68 points vs SMH.
-6.08 points vs SPY.
⚠ Expectations warningPositive catalyst, negative tape: EPS beat estimates by 8.7%, while price fell 4.4%. Treat the mismatch as expectations/distribution evidence, not as a bullish confirmation.
Session internals
Mixed
Rule: direction and internals disagree — it met neither the strong nor the weak rule. Judged on internals, not on the size of the move.
Vs prior close-4.43%From the open+2.82%Range position59%GapFaded
Positive catalyst received negative stock confirmation.
Price bars, sourced event fields, and benchmark math only. This can adjust displayed short-term conviction; it does not change the stored scanner score or readiness.
Generic technical analysis generated mechanically from price & volume — educational research only, not financial advice or a personalized recommendation. Levels are illustrative; confirm on your own chart. New to these terms? →
Legend Verdicts6 methodology checks
Who would consider this setup, why it qualifies, and what blocks it — calculated from the same deterministic methodology rules used across Legend AI. How to read the numbers: the setup score (78/100, in the verdict band) rates this trade setup. Each legend's A–D grade rates the same setup against that legend's own checklist — so a high score next to a C grade is not a contradiction. The setup can be strong without fitting that legend's style. When the council disagrees, the verdict band breaks the tie.
Council consensus:
5 of 9 legends are Watching — building, not yet a confirmed buy.
MinerviniAvoidDTrend-template read: fails Price > 150-day MA AND 200-day MA.
Passing evidence
✓1.2 150-day MA > 200-day MAMA150 $296.38 vs MA200 $255.97
✓1.4 50-day MA > 150-day MA AND 200-day MAMA50 $304.94, MA150 $296.38, MA200 $255.97
Failing evidence
✕1.1 Price > 150-day MA AND 200-day MAPrice $223.27, MA150 $296.38, MA200 $255.97
✕1.5 Price > 50-day MAPrice $223.27 vs MA50 $304.94
WeinsteinWatchBStage-analysis read: Stage 2 is present; 2 supporting checks need improvement.
mediumClassic Stage 2 advancing phase — strong weekly trend confirms uptrend. This is Weinstein's sweet spot: buy and hold while price remains above the 30-week MA.
dennisAvoidCTurtle read: price broke below the 20-day channel. The long system has no signal here.
Passing evidence
✓Volatility-unit sizing (1N ≈ 1% of equity)1N = $24.03 (10.76% of price); the Turtles size 1 unit so a 1N move ≈ 1% of equity, making the 2N stop ≈ 2% equity risk
✓Pyramid plan: adds at 0.5N, max 4 unitsAdd levels $235.28, $247.30, $259.31
Failing evidence
✕No breakdown below the 20-day channel20-day low $226.00
zangerAvoidCZanger read: a hard gate is broken — either the pattern is not one of his six, or the entry is more than 5% past the breakout. He would not touch this.
Passing evidence
✓Partial-profit plan: sell 20-30% at +15-20%Scale 20-30% at $256.76-$267.92; trail the rest
✓Trail on the 10/20-day MA10-day MA $259.41 · 20-day MA $284.12 — exit the remainder on a close below the trail
Failing evidence
✕Named Zanger pattern onlyTrend Only is not one of Zanger's six
✕Not extended (≤5% above the breakout point)Data unavailable
zweigWatchDZweig read: part of his screen passes but not all: Reasonable price for the growth (P/E ≤ 35); Insider buying — wait for the full growth screen before treating this as a Zweig setup.
Fundamentals & leadership quality — Minervini’s published criteria · 2/7 met
C
2/7 criteria
Separate score from the Minervini Trend Template (5/8): the Trend Template grades the price structure, this grades the company & leadership (earnings, sales, margins, RS rank). A stock can ride a clean trend while its fundamentals lag, so the two often differ by design — they are not the same checklist.
Minervini D · Avoid — The deterministic methodology check is Avoid; wait until the blocking criteria are resolved.
Pivot
Pro level
Published-method rule: Use the tight base's structural pivot; the setup must retain Trend Template leadership into the trigger. Evidence: Canonical setup geometry is available with Pro.
Entry trigger
Pro level
Published-method rule: Require a decisive move through the pivot with volume confirmation, and do not initiate more than 5% above it. Evidence: Canonical setup geometry is available with Pro.
Initial stop
Pro level
Published-method rule: Start at the tighter structural invalidation; the initial loss limit must not exceed roughly 7–8% from entry. Evidence: Canonical setup geometry is available with Pro.
Trail
Rule-based
Published-method rule: Hold the initial stop until the trade proves itself; near +1R move to breakeven, then trail a higher low or rising 10/21-day average once well extended. Evidence: Planned management rule; no stored stop or broker order is changed automatically.
Exit / invalidation
Pro level
Published-method rule: Exit when the structural stop or a meaningful higher-low/short-term trend violation fires; never widen the stop. Evidence: Canonical setup geometry is available with Pro.
Deterministic educational plan, not a recommendation. No order or stop is changed automatically. Method and sources →
Grades the price structure — moving-average stacking, distance from the 52-week high/low, and relative strength above the ≥70 uptrend bar. This is the technical trend check; the company's fundamentals and ≥80 RS leadership are scored separately in the Grade Card.
✗
Price above SMA 150 & 200$223.27 vs SMA150 $296.38 / SMA200 $255.97
✓
SMA 150 above SMA 200SMA150 $296.38 vs SMA200 $255.97