Simple research view

APH · Amphenol Corporation

$75.27 +1.59% Oct 26 close

Detected setup Cup & Handle · Setup Score 55/100

Stand aside — setup invalidated

Setup score 55, but price closes below stop $85.62 — stand aside until the condition resets.

1 independent risk warning also present. Review before relying on the bullish setup.

Ask about APH

Switch to Advanced for indicator panels, raw grades, provenance, drawing tools, and full technical tables.

$APH

Amphenol Corporation

Amphenol Corporation is a large-cap Electronic Components company in the Electronic Technology sector with a market cap of $93B.

Electronic Technology Electronic Components stock Stage 1 · Basing Base 3+

$75.27 latest close

⚠ Risk Signals

Double Top Double Top (confirmed): peaks $88.17 and $89.93 (2026-10-06) with the neckline at $75.75. neckline $75.75 broken on a closing basis 2 bars ago. Measured move targets $62.45; invalidation above $91.73. Research/educational only, not a buy/sell recommendation.

Bearish structure on the daily chart — a heads-up for anyone holding, not a short signal. Does not affect the bullish setup score.

Market Structure

Trend structure: range

Latest event: structure_shift (bearish)

Support 71.65–72.19 · 4 touches · moderate

Support 71.13–71.25 · 3 touches · moderate

Resistance 77.46–77.73 · 3 touches · moderate

Resistance 76.58–77.03 · 3 touches · moderate

Momentum Turn Watch

Bollinger Lower-Band Support Price ($75.27) is holding just above the lower Bollinger band ($73.24; %B 11) — support at the bottom of the bands.

Early technical context only. Wait for price, volume, and the canonical setup trigger to confirm; this signal does not change readiness or the setup score.

Join to Watchlist $APH Share card

Historical record

No active setup in the latest scan — this page shows the last detection Legend AI made for $APH. Every level, score and criterion below is computed from the Oct 26 close session (latest session), and may no longer hold.

Historical verdict · setup score 55/100 · data Oct 26 close · latest session

Stand aside — setup invalidated

Setup score 55, but price closes below stop $85.62 — stand aside until the condition resets.

Review six verdicts Inspect chart

Recent price action · daily

What would change this verdict

What needs to turn for this to become buyable — the top failing checks across the legend council:

Minervini 1.1 Price > 150-day MA AND 200-day MA — Price $75.27, MA150 $76.56, MA200 $75.27
Minervini 1.5 Price > 50-day MA — Price $75.27 vs MA50 $81.40
O'Neil C: Quarterly EPS acceleration ≥ 25% — +9.3% QoQ
O'Neil L: RS rank ≥ 80 (IBD leadership) — RS rank 74
Weinstein Price above 30-week MA (200-day proxy) — Price $75.27 vs MA200 $75.27
Weinstein Volume expansion above average — Volume ratio 0.99x

Minority view — the council disagrees here

Minervini: avoid Trend-template read: fails Price > 150-day MA AND 200-day MA.
O'Neil: avoid CANSLIM read: fails C: Quarterly EPS acceleration ≥ 25%.
Weinstein: watch Stage-analysis read: Stage 2 is present; 2 supporting checks need improvement.

66 Strong

Legend Score · rates the stock Strong (66/100) — held back by eps growth

Our proprietary 0-100 rating — the answer to Wall Street's black-box scores. Five pillars, each computed from real scan data, each explained below in plain English.

Relative Strength (25%) 74
Trend Template (25%) 100
Institutional Footprint (20%) 60
EPS Growth (15%) 30
Quality (SMR-like) (15%) 39

RS rank 74: above-average strength. Trend template 8/8: price above rising 50/150/200-day lines — textbook uptrend structure. Institutional score 60: neutral — no clear institutional conviction. EPS up +0% — growing, but below the 25% leadership bar. Quality 39: weak fundamentals (sales growth 31, return on equity 41, leverage 60). Updated 2026-10-15.

Earnings

Pre-earnings setup

Next earnings Wednesday, October 28, 2026 Before market open Exact clock time not supplied by source

Ordinary position sizing suppressed. Earnings are less than three full trading sessions away; treat the gap as event risk, not ordinary stop-distance risk.

Deterministic evidence

APH+1.59%

Sector proxy · XLK+1.69%

Broad market · SPY+0.71%

Same completed session window ending 2026-10-26. APH was -0.10 points vs XLK. +0.88 points vs SPY.

CatalystPending Stock reactionPositive Sector reactionSupportive Opening surgePending Event riskEarnings-driven

Session internals Mixed

Rule: direction and internals disagree — it met neither the strong nor the weak rule. Judged on internals, not on the size of the move.

Vs prior close+1.59% From the open+1.05% Range position57% GapNo gap

QQQ confirmationConfirming (+1.11%) SMH confirmationConfirming (+2.74%)

Short-term conviction -1 points.

A sourced earnings report is still pending inside the risk window; ordinary technical conviction is reduced until it is out.

Price bars, sourced event fields, and benchmark math only. This can adjust displayed short-term conviction; it does not change the stored scanner score or readiness.

Ask a Legend to interpret this evidence → Commentary only — never scanner evidence or a sizing recommendation.

Price $75.27 +1.6% Oct 26 close

52W High $89.93 16.3% below high

Wks Since High 2w

Base Depth 20.6%

RS Rank 45 percentile of scan

SMA 50 $81.40

Avg Vol 11,750,867

Rel Vol (Oct 26) 0.99× 0.74× on up days

More stats

52W Low $59.01

Tight Wks 0

Base B3

SMA 200 $75.27

RS Line vs High -10.1%

RS Line Slope +4.6% ▲

ADR% 3.1%

ATR(14) $3.02 (4.0%)

Vol Pace (live) N/A

A/D Days 14A / 15D

A/D Rating D

VDU Bars 0/10 d

Earnings tomorrow

Position in 52-week range 53rdpercentile of the 52-week range

$59.01low

$89.93high

APH Chart

Interactive price, volume, RS, RSI, and MACD charts are available after sign in.

Create a free account to load the full interactive chart for APH.

Create Free Account

Technical Analysis Report Card

$APH · $75.27 · as of 2026-10-26 · multi-factor read

/ 100

Technicals 26/100

Reference read from price & volume only — the verdict at the top of the page decides the action.

Trend · Daily / Weekly / Monthly

Daily ▬ Sideways / consolidating

Weekly ▬ Sideways / consolidating

Monthly ▼ Downtrend

Moving Averages

50-day$81.40 ↓

100-day$80.61 ↓

200-day$75.27 ↓

Bullish (50 > 200)

RSI (14)

Reading35.8 · Bearish

Bearish momentum — sellers in control.

MACD (12/26/9)

StateBearish

Histogram-1.315

Bearish — MACD below its signal line and below zero. Histogram expanding.

Bollinger Bands (20,2)

%B / Width11% · 22.9%

Near the lower band — under pressure or oversold.

Volume · Buyer vs Seller

Up/Down vol0.74 · Neutral

Rel volume0.99×

Pocket pivots · 10d0

5d vs 50d vol109%

Heavy vol up / down0 / 1

Balanced — up/down volume is roughly even; no clear hand. Recent volume is easing versus its baseline.

1 heavy-volume down day vs 0 up in the last 20 sessions — supply is showing.

Support & Resistance

R · $77.59swing level

R · $84.43swing level

R · $88.17swing level

Price · $75.27now

S · $73.02swing level

S · $69.47swing level

S · $59.0152-week low

Fibonacci · Uptrend swing

23.6%$82.63

38.2%$78.12

50.0% ◄ price here$74.47

61.8%$70.82

78.6%$65.63

Retracement support zones measured from the recent swing low up to the high.

The verdict is free. The trade plan is Pro.

Unlock the exact entry, stop-loss, profit target, and reward-to-risk for APH — plus the full 500+ symbol scanner and Ask-the-Legends chat.

Start your 7-day free trial →

Monthly downtrendBelow 200-day MA50/200 bullish

Want this read in a legend's voice? Ask a Legend about APH

Generic technical analysis generated mechanically from price & volume — educational research only, not financial advice or a personalized recommendation. Levels are illustrative; confirm on your own chart. New to these terms? →

Legend Verdicts 6 methodology checks

Who would consider this setup, why it qualifies, and what blocks it — calculated from the same deterministic methodology rules used across Legend AI.
How to read the numbers: the setup score (55/100, in the verdict band) rates this trade setup. Each legend's A–D grade rates the same setup against that legend's own checklist — so a high score next to a C grade is not a contradiction. The setup can be strong without fitting that legend's style. When the council disagrees, the verdict band breaks the tie.

Council consensus: 7 of 9 legends are Watching — building, not yet a confirmed buy.

Minervini Avoid B Trend-template read: fails Price > 150-day MA AND 200-day MA.

partialRule check says AVOID (9/12 checks passed) — Trend-template read: fails Price > 150-day MA AND 200-day MA.

Passing evidence

1.2 150-day MA > 200-day MAMA150 $76.56 vs MA200 $75.27

1.4 50-day MA > 150-day MA AND 200-day MAMA50 $81.40, MA150 $76.56, MA200 $75.27

Failing evidence

1.1 Price > 150-day MA AND 200-day MAPrice $75.27, MA150 $76.56, MA200 $75.27

1.5 Price > 50-day MAPrice $75.27 vs MA50 $81.40

9/12 checks

Method → Playbook → Ask →

O'Neil Avoid D CANSLIM read: fails C: Quarterly EPS acceleration ≥ 25%.

partialRule check says AVOID (2/8 checks passed) — CANSLIM read: fails C: Quarterly EPS acceleration ≥ 25%.

Passing evidence

A: Annual earnings & revenue qualityRev +51.7% | ROE 34.7%

S: Base tightness (ATR% ≤ 4.5%)ATR% 4.02%

Failing evidence

C: Quarterly EPS acceleration ≥ 25%+9.3% QoQ

L: RS rank ≥ 80 (IBD leadership)RS rank 74

2/8 checks

Method → Playbook → Ask →

Weinstein Watch B Stage-analysis read: Stage 2 is present; 2 supporting checks need improvement.

mediumClassic Stage 2 advancing phase — strong weekly trend confirms uptrend. This is Weinstein's sweet spot: buy and hold while price remains above the 30-week MA.

Passing evidence

Stage 2 (Advancing phase) confirmedStage 2 (Advancing)

30-week MA trending upwardFrom weekly scan context

Failing evidence

Price above 30-week MA (200-day proxy)Price $75.27 vs MA200 $75.27

Volume expansion above averageVolume ratio 0.99x

6/8 checks

Method → Playbook → Ask →

dennis Watch C Turtle read: no Donchian signal. The system stays flat until price takes out the 20-day high.

Passing evidence

No breakdown below the 20-day channel20-day low $71.44

Volatility-unit sizing (1N ≈ 1% of equity)1N = $2.93 (3.89% of price); the Turtles size 1 unit so a 1N move ≈ 1% of equity, making the 2N stop ≈ 2% equity risk

Failing evidence

S1: 20-day Donchian breakoutNot confirmed

S2: 55-day Donchian breakoutNot confirmed

5/7 checks

Method → Playbook → Ask →

zanger Watch B Zanger read: the structure is fine but the breakout quality is not there yet — wait for 150%+ volume on the break.

partialZanger would buy the Cup & Handle breakout only with 150-200% volume, never more than 5% above the breakout point, with a 2-3% stop set at entry. His edge over O'Neil is the exit plan: sell 20-30% of the position at +15-20%, then trail the rest on the 10/20-day moving average.

Passing evidence

Named Zanger pattern onlyCup & Handle

Not extended (≤5% above the breakout point)Measured as passing

Failing evidence

Breakout volume 1.5-2.0x averageData unavailable

5/6 checks

Method → Playbook → Ask →

zweig Watch D Zweig read: part of his screen passes but not all: EPS growth above the market (≥15% QoQ); Insider buying — wait for the full growth screen before treating this as a Zweig setup.

Passing evidence

Reasonable price for the growth (P/E ≤ 35)Trailing P/E 22.5x — no PEG or forward P/E stored

Price strength (RS ≥ 70)RS score 74 — Zweig buys strength, not bargains

Failing evidence

EPS growth above the market (≥15% QoQ)+9.3% QoQ — Zweig wants growth above the S&P average

Insider buyingNo insider buying flagged

4/8 checks

Method → Playbook → Ask →

Livermore Watch B Pivotal-point read: constructive evidence is present, but volume vs average is unresolved.

Passing evidence

Price$75.27

Relative strengthRS 74

Failing evidence

Volume vs average0.99x

Pivotal point cleared on expanding volumeNot confirmed

4/6 checks

Method → Playbook → Ask →

Darvas Watch B Box-theory read: constructive evidence is present, but volume vs average is unresolved.

partialConsolidating within the box (8.1% from 52W high) — patience until it approaches the prior high.

Passing evidence

Price$75.27

Relative strengthRS 74

Failing evidence

Volume vs average0.99x

Box top broken on heavy volumeNot confirmed

4/6 checks

Method → Playbook → Ask →

Wyckoff Watch B Supply-and-demand read: constructive evidence is present, but volume vs average is unresolved.

Passing evidence

Price$75.27

Relative strengthRS 74

Failing evidence

Volume vs average0.99x

Sign of Strength confirmed on expanding volumePrice hasn't cleared the pivot yet — confirmation pending

4/6 checks

Method → Playbook → Ask →

Base & Breakout

Breakout follow-through

No active breakout tracked — Legend AI monitors daily for pivot-point breaks. What's a breakout?

Unlock Base & Breakout Tracking

RS Line vs SPY 52-week relative strength · blue = RS line · dashed = MA50 · dot = NH ▲ Rising

Accumulation / Distribution last 65 sessions · green = acc on high vol · red = dist on high vol Net +1 D

Minervini · Grade Card

Fundamentals & leadership quality — Minervini’s published criteria · 4/7 met

B 4/7 criteria

Separate score from the Minervini Trend Template (5/8): the Trend Template grades the price structure, this grades the company & leadership (earnings, sales, margins, RS rank). A stock can ride a clean trend while its fundamentals lag, so the two often differ by design — they are not the same checklist.

✗ EPS acceleration ≥25% QoQ +9%

✓ Revenue growth ≥20% YoY +52%

✓ Gross margin ≥30% 38%

✓ ROE ≥17% 35%

✗ RS rating ≥80 (leadership) 74

✗ Stage 2 uptrend (Weinstein) Stage 1

✓ Within 25% of 52W high -16.3%

Method Playbook

Trade it like Darvas EXACT LEVELS · PRO

Minervini O'Neil Livermore Weinstein Darvas Wyckoff

Darvas B · Watch — The deterministic methodology check is Watch; wait for the failing or incomplete criteria to improve before the trigger can qualify.

Pivot

Pro level

Published-method rule: Use the top of the active Darvas box near the high as the mechanical breakout boundary.
Evidence: Canonical setup geometry is available with Pro.

Entry trigger

Pro level

Published-method rule: Require price to clear the box top with volume confirmation; movement inside the box remains observation, not a trigger.
Evidence: Canonical setup geometry is available with Pro.

Initial stop

Pro level

Published-method rule: Start below the active box support or the canonical structural stop that proves the breakout failed.
Evidence: Canonical setup geometry is available with Pro.

Trail

Rule-based

Published-method rule: As higher boxes form, raise the stop beneath the newest confirmed box floor; the stop moves up only.
Evidence: Planned management rule; no stored stop or broker order is changed automatically.

Exit / invalidation

Pro level

Published-method rule: Exit when price breaks the active box floor or decisively falls back through the breakout structure.
Evidence: Canonical setup geometry is available with Pro.

Deterministic educational plan, not a recommendation. No order or stop is changed automatically. Method and sources →

The published-method workflow is public. Unlock exact pivot, entry, stop, target, and sizing with Pro →

Pattern Analysis (historical)

Cup & Handle Historical replay: +20% before −8% within 40 sessions: 16% (n=376) · source bars 2024-11-01–2026-10-26 · avg +0.3% per setup (+0.03R) ⚠ Late-stage base (#4) ⚠ Not actionable yet

55 setup score

RS Score 74

Trend template 5/8

CANSLIM 74.8* (B)

24.3% cup depth 4.0% handle rims outside 10% ideal

Cup 24.3% deep from a $77.96 left rim to a $59.01 low
Rims 14.5% apart (accepted, but outside the 10% ideal)
Handle pulled back 4.0% over 1 bar from $83.40 to $80.05
Handle sits in the upper half of the cup
Rounded U-shaped bottom
Pivot $89.26 fixed at the handle high
No close above the pivot yet
Volume dried up in the handle

Raw detector evidence · confidence is a heuristic match score, not a probability

depth=24.3%, handle_pb=4.0%, lips_diff=14.5%, upper_half=yes, u_shape=yes, near_pivot=no, orderly=yes | Strong trend (8/8) | Good RS (74) | High-confidence pattern (72%) | Stage 2 | Readiness 61/100 (early) | CANSLIM 74.8 (B) | ⚠ Late-stage base (#4); Not actionable yet
setup_key=cup_handle|2026-05-19|2026-06-30|89.26 · cup_handle/2026-10-03
anchors={"bottom": {"bar": 107, "bars_ago": 102, "date": "2026-05-19", "price": 59.01}, "breakout": null, "handle_high": {"bar": 194, "bars_ago": 15, "date": "2026-09-23", "price": 83.4}, "handle_low": {"bar": 195, "bars_ago": 14, "date": "2026-09-24", "price": 80.05}, "left_lip": {"bar": 25, "bars_ago": 184, "date": "2026-01-21", "price": 77.964}, "right_lip": {"bar": 135, "bars_ago": 74, "date": "2026-06-30", "price": 89.26}}

Why This Setup? D+W Confluence

Cup & Handle · schematic

Ascending Triangle ⚠ Late-stage base (#4) ⚠ Not actionable yet

55 setup score

RS Score 74

Trend template 5/8

CANSLIM 74.4* (B)

high slope: 0.0612 low slope: 0.219 triangle height: 4.81 depth: 0.055 triangle volume ratio: 0.898 validation reason: valid generic setup multi tf evaluated: ✓ multi tf reason: weekly trend template 8/8 confirmed + weekly coiling

Why This Setup? D+W Confluence

Ascending Triangle · schematic

The Universal Edge Check · context only

What the setup still has going for it, recorded for later. The verdict above stands — these principles do not overrule it.

3/7 universals met

A relative-strength leader — not met RS rank 45 — laggard
Clear of earnings — not met in 1 days — event risk
In a confirmed uptrend — partly met Stage 1 · Trend template 5/8 — not yet Stage 2
Volume confirms — partly met 0.8× average — light
Asymmetric reward — met Met — levels are a Pro detail
Not chasing (in range) — met Met — levels are a Pro detail
Risk is defined — met Met — levels are a Pro detail

Why these seven? → The Universal Edge

Minervini Trend Template

5/8

Grades the price structure — moving-average stacking, distance from the 52-week high/low, and relative strength above the ≥70 uptrend bar. This is the technical trend check; the company's fundamentals and ≥80 RS leadership are scored separately in the Grade Card.

Price above SMA 150 & 200 $75.27 vs SMA150 $76.56 / SMA200 $75.27

SMA 150 above SMA 200 SMA150 $76.56 vs SMA200 $75.27

SMA 200 trending up Slope +1.50 over 20 days

SMA 50 above SMA 150 & 200 SMA50 $81.40

Price above SMA 50 $75.27 vs SMA50 $81.40

30%+ above 52-week low +27.6% from $59.01

Within 25% of 52-week high -16.3% from $89.93

RS score above 70 RS 74

Fundamentals

52W Range

53%

Mkt Cap SEC

92.8B

EPS QoQ

+9%

Rev YoY

+52%

ROE

35%

Gross Margin

38%

D/E

1.16

EPS TTM

$3.34

P/E TTM

22.5x

Float

1.2B

Insider

No Buy

Company

Company profile

Amphenol Corporation

APH · NYSE · Electronic Technology · Electronic Components

O'Neil · Grade Card

CANSLIM — current EPS, annual EPS, new highs, supply, leader RS, inst. sponsorship, market

B 74.8* CANSLIM * disqualified on C, M

C · Curr. EPS

A · Annual EPS

100

N · New Highs

100

S · Supply/Demand

L · Leader RS

I · Inst. Spons.

M · Market

Weekly Context

Multi-timeframe signals from weekly bars

W. Trend

8/8

W. RS

W. Support

$59.01

W. Resist

$89.93

W. Patterns

Cup & Handle

Weekly Structure

Trend Neutral

Tight Weeks 0

Confirmation Neutral

Scan History

Oct 15

Cup & Handle ✓ Gate

Oct 14

Cup & Handle ✓ Gate

80 -9.0%

Oct 13

Cup & Handle ✓ Gate

80 -12.4%

Oct 12

Cup & Handle ✓ Gate

80 -12.7%

Latest News

Headlines for APH

Loading headlines…

Get the full picture on APH

Pro members see entry/stop/target levels, R:R ratios, intraday alerts, and every setup detected across 500+ symbols daily.

Start 7-Day Free Trial