Uptrend Under Pressure 100
Institutional selling is building — 7 distribution days in the last 25 sessions. Severe risk · 100/100 · 7 distribution days (SPY) Oct 26 Full briefing →
View
Simple research view

CDW · CDW Corporation

$163.23 -1.14% Oct 26 close
Detected setup Cup & Handle · Setup Score 71/100

Stand aside — setup invalidated

Setup score 71, but distribution days reach 5 or more — stand aside until the condition resets.

Ask about CDW

Switch to Advanced for indicator panels, raw grades, provenance, drawing tools, and full technical tables.

$CDW

CDW Corporation

CDW Corporation is a large-cap Information Technology Services company in the Technology Services sector with a market cap of $20B.

Technology Services Information Technology Services stock Stage 2 · Advancing Base 3+
$163.23 latest close
Market Structure
Trend structure: downtrend
Latest event: structure_shift (bullish)
Support 126.28–127.39 · 4 touches · moderate
Support 137.78–138.81 · 4 touches · moderate
Support 135.63–136.09 · 3 touches · moderate
Support 123.08–123.18 · 3 touches · moderate
Support 130.56–131.42 · 3 touches · moderate
Verdict · setup score 71/100 · data Oct 26 close · latest session

Stand aside — setup invalidated

Setup score 71, but distribution days reach 5 or more — stand aside until the condition resets.

Recent price action · daily
$120$140$160AugSepOct$163

What would change this verdict

What needs to turn for this to become buyable — the top failing checks across the legend council:

  • Minervini 2. Quarterly EPS growth ≥ 25% — -11.3% QoQ
  • Minervini 2. Revenue growth ≥ 20% YoY — +6.8% YoY
  • O'Neil C: Quarterly EPS acceleration ≥ 25% — -11.3% QoQ
  • O'Neil L: RS rank ≥ 80 (IBD leadership) — RS rank 72
  • Weinstein Volume expansion above average — Volume ratio 0.95x
  • Dennis S1: 20-day Donchian breakout
Minority view — the council disagrees here
  • Minervini: watch Trend-template read: 9/12 pass; wait for the soft misses to improve.
  • O'Neil: avoid CANSLIM read: fails C: Quarterly EPS acceleration ≥ 25%.
  • Weinstein: watch Stage-analysis read: Stage 2 is present; 1 supporting checks need improvement.
66 Strong
Legend Score · rates the stock Strong (66/100) — held back by eps growth

Our proprietary 0-100 rating — the answer to Wall Street's black-box scores. Five pillars, each computed from real scan data, each explained below in plain English.

  • Relative Strength (25%) 72
  • Trend Template (25%) 100
  • Institutional Footprint (20%) 70
  • EPS Growth (15%) 30
  • Quality (SMR-like) (15%) 33

RS rank 72: above-average strength. Trend template 8/8: price above rising 50/150/200-day lines — textbook uptrend structure. Institutional score 70: mild accumulation. EPS -0% last quarter — no earnings momentum. Quality 33: weak fundamentals (sales growth 30, return on equity 42, leverage 20). Updated 2026-10-27.

Earnings

Pre-earnings setup

Next earnings Monday, November 2, 2026 Before market open Exact clock time not supplied by source

Deterministic evidence

CDW-1.14%
Sector proxy · XLK+1.69%
Broad market · SPY+0.71%
Same completed session window ending 2026-10-26. CDW was -2.83 points vs XLK. -1.85 points vs SPY.
CatalystPending Stock reactionNegative Sector reactionSupportive Opening surgePending Event riskEarnings-driven

Session internals Weak

Rule: closed flat-to-down and in the bottom third of the range. Judged on internals, not on the size of the move.

Vs prior close-1.14% From the open-1.14% Range position29% GapNo gap
QQQ confirmationDiverging (+1.11%) SMH confirmationDiverging (+2.74%)
Short-term conviction -2 points.
  • QQQ, SMH moved against the stock — no index confirmation.
  • A sourced earnings report is still pending inside the risk window; ordinary technical conviction is reduced until it is out.
Price bars, sourced event fields, and benchmark math only. This can adjust displayed short-term conviction; it does not change the stored scanner score or readiness.

Ask a Legend to interpret this evidence → Commentary only — never scanner evidence or a sizing recommendation.

Price $163.23 -1.1% Oct 26 close
52W High $166.15 1.8% below high
Wks Since High 0w
Base Depth 2.9%
RS Rank 40 percentile of scan
SMA 50 $145.04
Avg Vol 1,588,705
Rel Vol (Oct 26) 0.95× 2.61× on up days
More stats
52W Low $97.12
Tight Wks 0
Base B3
SMA 200 $132.59
RS Line vs High -8.7%
RS Line Slope +25.6% ▲
Group Rank #17/66
ADR% 3.4%
ATR(14) $5.19 (3.2%)
Vol Pace (live) N/A
A/D Days 18A / 13D
A/D Rating A+
VDU Bars 0/10 d
Power Trend 8d
Earnings in 6d
Position in 52-week range 96thpercentile of the 52-week range
$97.12low
$166.15high

CDW Chart

Interactive price, volume, RS, RSI, and MACD charts are available after sign in.

Create a free account to load the full interactive chart for CDW.

Create Free Account

Technical Analysis Report Card

$CDW · $163.23 · as of 2026-10-26 · multi-factor read
100
/ 100
Technicals 100/100
Reference read from price & volume only — the verdict at the top of the page decides the action.

Trend · Daily / Weekly / Monthly

Daily ▲ Uptrend
Weekly ▲ Uptrend
Monthly ▲ Uptrend

Moving Averages

50-day$145.04 ↑
100-day$140.62 ↑
200-day$132.59 ↑
Bullish (50 > 200)

RSI (14)

Reading67.7 · Bullish

Bullish momentum — comfortably in buyer territory.

MACD (12/26/9)

StateBullish
Histogram+2.341

Bullish — MACD above its signal line and above zero. Histogram contracting.

Bollinger Bands (20,2)

%B / Width86% · 32.4%

Near the upper band — buyers in control.

Volume · Buyer vs Seller

Up/Down vol2.61 · Accumulation
Rel volume0.95×
Pocket pivots · 10d1
5d vs 50d vol92%
Heavy vol up / down0 / 1

Accumulation — volume is concentrated on up days; buyers dominate. Recent volume is expanding versus its baseline.

  • Pocket pivot 9 sessions ago — up-day volume beat every down day of the prior 10 sessions.
  • 1 heavy-volume down day vs 0 up in the last 20 sessions — supply is showing.

Support & Resistance

R · $166.1552-week high
Price · $163.23now
S · $140.91swing level
S · $130.88swing level
S · $127.58swing level

Fibonacci · Uptrend swing

23.6%$149.86
38.2%$139.78
50.0%$131.63
61.8%$123.49
78.6%$111.89

Retracement support zones measured from the recent swing low up to the high.

The verdict is free. The trade plan is Pro.
Unlock the exact entry, stop-loss, profit target, and reward-to-risk for CDW — plus the full 500+ symbol scanner and Ask-the-Legends chat.
Start your 7-day free trial →
Daily uptrendWeekly uptrendMonthly uptrendAbove 200-day MA50/200 bullishVolume accumulation
Want this read in a legend's voice? Ask a Legend about CDW
Generic technical analysis generated mechanically from price & volume — educational research only, not financial advice or a personalized recommendation. Levels are illustrative; confirm on your own chart. New to these terms? →
Legend Verdicts 6 methodology checks

Who would consider this setup, why it qualifies, and what blocks it — calculated from the same deterministic methodology rules used across Legend AI.
How to read the numbers: the setup score (71/100, in the verdict band) rates this trade setup. Each legend's A–D grade rates the same setup against that legend's own checklist — so a high score next to a C grade is not a contradiction. The setup can be strong without fitting that legend's style. When the council disagrees, the verdict band breaks the tie.

Council consensus: 7 of 9 legends are Watching — building, not yet a confirmed buy.
Minervini Watch B Trend-template read: 9/12 pass; wait for the soft misses to improve.

partialEnter on break of $154.93 pivot with stop at $148.25 (risk 4.3%). SEPA Grade C (3/7).

Passing evidence
1.1 Price > 150-day MA AND 200-day MAPrice $163.23, MA150 $134.64, MA200 $132.59
1.2 150-day MA > 200-day MAMA150 $134.64 vs MA200 $132.59
Failing evidence
2. Quarterly EPS growth ≥ 25%-11.3% QoQ
2. Revenue growth ≥ 20% YoY+6.8% YoY
9/12 checks
O'Neil Avoid D CANSLIM read: fails C: Quarterly EPS acceleration ≥ 25%.

partialRule check says AVOID (3/8 checks passed) — CANSLIM read: fails C: Quarterly EPS acceleration ≥ 25%.

Passing evidence
A: Annual earnings & revenue qualityRev +6.8% | ROE 42.4%
N: Near 52-week high or RS line new high1.8% below high | RS line new high: False
Failing evidence
C: Quarterly EPS acceleration ≥ 25%-11.3% QoQ
L: RS rank ≥ 80 (IBD leadership)RS rank 72
3/8 checks
Weinstein Watch B Stage-analysis read: Stage 2 is present; 1 supporting checks need improvement.

mediumClassic Stage 2 advancing phase — strong weekly trend confirms uptrend. This is Weinstein's sweet spot: buy and hold while price remains above the 30-week MA.

Passing evidence
Stage 2 (Advancing phase) confirmedStage 2 (Advancing)
Price above 30-week MA (200-day proxy)Price $163.23 vs MA200 $132.59
Failing evidence
Volume expansion above averageVolume ratio 0.95x
6/7 checks
dennis Watch C Turtle read: no breakout yet. Price is pressing the 20-day high. The system waits for the print; it never anticipates.
Passing evidence
No breakdown below the 20-day channel20-day low $127.77
Volatility-unit sizing (1N ≈ 1% of equity)1N = $5.52 (3.38% of price); the Turtles size 1 unit so a 1N move ≈ 1% of equity, making the 2N stop ≈ 2% equity risk
Failing evidence
S1: 20-day Donchian breakoutNot confirmed
S2: 55-day Donchian breakoutNot confirmed
5/7 checks
zanger Avoid C Zanger read: a hard gate is broken — either the pattern is not one of his six, or the entry is more than 5% past the breakout. He would not touch this.

partialRule check says AVOID (4/6 checks passed) — Zanger read: a hard gate is broken — either the pattern is not one of his six, or the entry is more than 5% past the breakout. He would not touch this.

Passing evidence
Named Zanger pattern onlyCup & Handle
Partial-profit plan: sell 20-30% at +15-20%Scale 20-30% at $187.71-$195.88; trail the rest
Failing evidence
Not extended (≤5% above the breakout point)Not confirmed
Breakout volume 1.5-2.0x averageData unavailable
4/6 checks
zweig Watch D Zweig read: part of his screen passes but not all: EPS growth above the market (≥15% QoQ); Insider buying — wait for the full growth screen before treating this as a Zweig setup.
Passing evidence
Reasonable price for the growth (P/E ≤ 35)Trailing P/E 20.2x — no PEG or forward P/E stored
Price strength (RS ≥ 70)RS score 72 — Zweig buys strength, not bargains
Failing evidence
EPS growth above the market (≥15% QoQ)-11.3% QoQ — Zweig wants growth above the S&P average
Insider buyingNo insider buying flagged
4/8 checks
Livermore Watch B Pivotal-point read: constructive evidence is present, but volume vs average is unresolved.
Passing evidence
Price$163.23
Relative strengthRS 72
Failing evidence
Volume vs average0.95x
Pivotal point cleared on expanding volumeNot confirmed
4/6 checks
Darvas Watch B Box-theory read: constructive evidence is present, but volume vs average is unresolved.

mediumStock is at the top of its box — Darvas would wait for a decisive breakout on volume.

Passing evidence
Price$163.23
Relative strengthRS 72
Failing evidence
Volume vs average0.95x
Box top broken on heavy volumeNot confirmed
4/6 checks
Wyckoff Watch B Supply-and-demand read: constructive evidence is present, but volume vs average is unresolved.
Passing evidence
Price$163.23
Relative strengthRS 72
Failing evidence
Volume vs average0.95x
Sign of Strength confirmed on expanding volume0.95x average volume — needs ≥1.4x
4/6 checks
Base & Breakout
Breakout follow-through

No active breakout tracked — Legend AI monitors daily for pivot-point breaks. What's a breakout?

Latest candle: Bearish Engulfing — Today's down candle engulfs yesterday's up candle — a bearish reversal warning, most significant after an extended advance.

RS Line vs SPY 52-week relative strength · blue = RS line · dashed = MA50 · dot = NH ▲ Rising
92RS Line (52W)
Accumulation / Distribution last 65 sessions · green = acc on high vol · red = dist on high vol Net +8 A+
A: 18 D: 10 Net: +865 sessions
Minervini · Grade Card
Fundamentals & leadership quality — Minervini’s published criteria · 3/7 met
C 3/7 criteria
Separate score from the Minervini Trend Template (8/8): the Trend Template grades the price structure, this grades the company & leadership (earnings, sales, margins, RS rank). A stock can ride a clean trend while its fundamentals lag, so the two often differ by design — they are not the same checklist.
✗ EPS acceleration ≥25% QoQ -11%
✗ Revenue growth ≥20% YoY +7%
✗ Gross margin ≥30% 22%
✓ ROE ≥17% 42%
✗ RS rating ≥80 (leadership) 72
✓ Stage 2 uptrend (Weinstein) Stage 2
✓ Within 25% of 52W high -1.8%

Method Playbook

Trade it like Minervini EXACT LEVELS · PRO
Minervini B · Watch — The deterministic methodology check is Watch; wait for the failing or incomplete criteria to improve before the trigger can qualify.
Pivot
Pro level
Published-method rule: Use the tight base's structural pivot; the setup must retain Trend Template leadership into the trigger.
Evidence: Canonical setup geometry is available with Pro.
Entry trigger
Pro level
Published-method rule: Require a decisive move through the pivot with volume confirmation, and do not initiate more than 5% above it.
Evidence: Canonical setup geometry is available with Pro.
Initial stop
Pro level
Published-method rule: Start at the tighter structural invalidation; the initial loss limit must not exceed roughly 7–8% from entry.
Evidence: Canonical setup geometry is available with Pro.
Trail
Rule-based
Published-method rule: Hold the initial stop until the trade proves itself; near +1R move to breakeven, then trail a higher low or rising 10/21-day average once well extended.
Evidence: Planned management rule; no stored stop or broker order is changed automatically.
Exit / invalidation
Pro level
Published-method rule: Exit when the structural stop or a meaningful higher-low/short-term trend violation fires; never widen the stop.
Evidence: Canonical setup geometry is available with Pro.
Deterministic educational plan, not a recommendation. No order or stop is changed automatically. Method and sources →

Pattern Analysis

Cup & Handle Historical replay: +20% before −8% within 40 sessions: 16% (n=376) · source bars 2024-11-01–2026-10-26 · avg +0.3% per setup (+0.03R) ⚠ Extended past buy zone ⚠ 3rd-stage base
71 setup score
RS Score 72
Trend template 8/8 ✓
CANSLIM 68.8* (B)
18.1% cup depth 3.7% handle 5 sessions since breakout
  • Cup 18.1% deep from a $155.97 left rim to a $127.77 low
  • Rims 2.3% apart (ideal, within 10%)
  • Handle pulled back 3.7% over 1 bar from $154.78 to $149.00
  • Handle sits in the upper half of the cup
  • Rounded U-shaped bottom
  • Pivot $154.78 fixed at the handle high
  • Breakout: 5 bars since the first close above the pivot
  • Handle volume did not dry up
Raw detector evidence · confidence is a heuristic match score, not a probability depth=18.1%, handle_pb=3.7%, lips_diff=2.3%, upper_half=yes, u_shape=yes, near_pivot=yes, orderly=yes | Strong trend (8/8) | Good RS (72) | High-confidence pattern (93%) | Accumulation (2.6× up/dn vol) | Power Trend | Stage 2 | Readiness 65/100 (watch) | CANSLIM 68.8 (B) | ⚠ Extended past buy zone; 3rd-stage base setup_key=cup_handle|2026-09-30|2026-10-13|154.78 · cup_handle/2026-10-03 anchors={"bottom": {"bar": 26, "bars_ago": 18, "date": "2026-09-30", "price": 127.77}, "breakout": {"bar": 40, "bars_ago": 4, "date": "2026-10-20", "price": 154.99}, "handle_high": {"bar": 37, "bars_ago": 7, "date": "2026-10-15", "price": 154.78}, "handle_low": {"bar": 38, "bars_ago": 6, "date": "2026-10-16", "price": 149.0}, "left_lip": {"bar": 13, "bars_ago": 31, "date": "2026-09-11", "price": 155.9665}, "right_lip": {"bar": 35, "bars_ago": 9, "date": "2026-10-13", "price": 152.43}}
Why This Setup? D+W Confluence
cup handle Cup & Handle · schematic

depth=18.1%, handle_pb=3.7%, lips_diff=2.3%, upper_half=yes, u_shape=yes, near_pivot=yes, orderly=yes | Strong trend (8/8) | Good RS (72) | High-confidence pattern (93%) | Accumulation (2.6× up/dn vol) | Power Trend | Stage 2 | Readiness 65/100 (watch) | CANSLIM 68.8 (B) | ⚠ Extended past buy zone; 3rd-stage base

Descending Triangle ⚠ Extended past buy zone ⚠ 3rd-stage base ⚠ Not actionable yet
55 setup score
RS Score 72
Trend template 8/8 ✓
CANSLIM 66.8* (B)
high slope: -0.003741 low slope: 0.002787 pattern bars: 39 tighten ratio: 0.047 apex bars ahead: 5.8 apex price: 136.79 state: breakout direction: bullish pattern height: 31.56 ma len: 200 ma value: 132.59 under ma: -0.2311 ma rising: ✗ near ma: ✓ ma touch bar ago: 119 triangle volume ratio: 0.777 volume dry up: ✓ signal volume ratio: 0.57 depth: 0.0369 geometry: {'resistance_rail': {'start': {'bar': 83, 'bars_ago': 36, 'price': 158.04, 'date': '2026-09-03'}, 'end': {'bar': 119, 'bars_ago': 0, 'price': 139.74, 'date': '2026-10-26'}}, 'support_rail': {'start': {'bar': 62, 'bars_ago': 57, 'price': 113.0, 'date': '2026-08-05'}, 'end': {'bar': 119, 'bars_ago': 0, 'price': 134.5869, 'date': '2026-10-26'}}, 'apex': {'bar': 124.81, 'bars_ago': -5.81, 'price': 136.787, 'date': '2026-10-31'}, 'breakout_bar': {'bar': 115, 'bars_ago': 4, 'price': 154.99, 'date': '2026-10-20'}, 'breakout_level': 141.7733, 'ma_line': {'label': '200-day SMA', 'start': {'bar': 109, 'bars_ago': 10, 'price': 131.5383, 'date': '2026-10-12'}, 'end': {'bar': 119, 'bars_ago': 0, 'price': 132.5931, 'date': '2026-10-26'}}, 'ma_touch_bar': {'bar': 0, 'bars_ago': 119, 'price': 109.0, 'date': '2026-05-06'}, 'ma_value': 132.59} confidence kind: heuristic_match detector version: descending_triangle/2026-09-27 findings: ['Resistance falling -0.37%/day into flat support (+0.28%/day) — sellers pressing, buyers defending', 'Rails tighten to 5% of the starting range; apex 6 bars ahead', 'Uptrend context: close $163.23 vs 200-day SMA $132.59 (-23.1%)', 'Pressing into the 200-day SMA — closest touch (2026-05-06) at $109.00', 'BREAKOUT above $141.77', 'Volume drying up through the pattern'] not falling wedge: ✓ not falling wedge reason: no prior-downtrend requirement — this is an uptrend correction pressing into the long MA, the shape the Falling Wedge detector explicitly rejects validation reason: valid generic setup multi tf evaluated: ✓ multi tf reason: weekly trend template 8/8 confirmed + weekly coiling
Why This Setup? D+W Confluence
Descending Triangle · schematic

Descending Triangle (breakout, bullish): resistance falling -0.37%/day into flat support near $134.59, squeezing into the 200-day SMA ($132.59) inside an uptrend. Broke out above $141.77. Research/educational only, not a buy/sell recommendation. | Strong trend (8/8) | Good RS (72) | High-confidence pattern (93%) | Accumulation (2.6× up/dn vol) | Power Trend | Stage 2 | Readiness 55/100 (early) | CANSLIM 66.8 (B) | ⚠ Extended past buy zone; 3rd-stage base; Not actionable yet

Symmetrical Triangle ⚠ Extended past buy zone ⚠ 3rd-stage base ⚠ Not actionable yet
55 setup score
RS Score 72
Trend template 8/8 ✓
CANSLIM 66.6* (B)
high slope: -0.003562 low slope: 0.002654 slope balance: 0.745 pattern bars: 39 tighten ratio: 0.068 apex bars ahead: 5.8 apex price: 136.79 state: breakout breakout bar ago: 4 breakout volume ratio: 0.63 triangle volume ratio: 0.809 volume dry up: ✓ depth: 0.0369 anchors: {'resistance_anchor': {'bar': 43, 'bars_ago': 36, 'price': 158.04, 'date': '2026-09-03'}, 'support_anchor': {'bar': 22, 'bars_ago': 57, 'price': 113.0, 'date': '2026-08-05'}} geometry: {'resistance_rail': {'start': {'bar': 43, 'bars_ago': 36, 'price': 158.04, 'date': '2026-09-03'}, 'end': {'bar': 79, 'bars_ago': 0, 'price': 139.74, 'date': '2026-10-26'}}, 'support_rail': {'start': {'bar': 22, 'bars_ago': 57, 'price': 113.0, 'date': '2026-08-05'}, 'end': {'bar': 79, 'bars_ago': 0, 'price': 134.5869, 'date': '2026-10-26'}}, 'apex': {'bar': 84.81, 'bars_ago': -5.81, 'price': 136.787, 'date': '2026-10-31'}, 'breakout_bar': {'bar': 75, 'bars_ago': 4, 'price': 154.99, 'date': '2026-10-20'}, 'breakout_level': 141.7733, 'poc_price': 148.88} poc price: 148.88 confidence kind: heuristic_match detector version: symmetrical_triangle/2026-09-27 findings: ['Resistance falling -0.36%/day, support rising 0.27%/day — balanced convergence (ratio 0.75)', 'Rails tighten to 7% of the starting range over 39 bars', 'Apex projects 6 bars ahead at ~$136.79', 'BREAKOUT: closed above the rail at $154.99 (4 bars ago) on 0.6x average volume', 'Volume drying up through the pattern — classic coil', 'Volume-profile point of control inside the pattern: $148.88'] not pennant: ✓ not pennant reason: no directional pole required or checked — pure rail convergence, unlike the Pennant detector validation reason: valid generic setup multi tf evaluated: ✓ multi tf reason: weekly trend template 8/8 confirmed + weekly coiling
Why This Setup? D+W Confluence
Symmetrical Triangle · schematic

Symmetrical Triangle (breakout): lower highs (-0.36%/day) and higher lows (0.27%/day) converging to an apex 6 bars ahead; broke out above $141.77. Research/educational only, not a buy/sell recommendation. | Strong trend (8/8) | Good RS (72) | High-confidence pattern (90%) | Accumulation (2.6× up/dn vol) | Power Trend | Stage 2 | Readiness 54/100 (early) | CANSLIM 66.6 (B) | ⚠ Extended past buy zone; 3rd-stage base; Not actionable yet

The Universal Edge Check · context only

What the setup still has going for it, recorded for later. The verdict above stands — these principles do not overrule it.

3/7 universals met
  • A relative-strength leader — not met RS rank 40 — laggard
  • Clear of earnings — not met in 6 days — event risk
  • Not chasing (in range) — partly met Partly met — levels are a Pro detail
  • Volume confirms — partly met 0.9× average — light
  • Asymmetric reward — met Met — levels are a Pro detail
  • In a confirmed uptrend — met Stage 2 · Trend template 8/8
  • Risk is defined — met Met — levels are a Pro detail
Why these seven? → The Universal Edge

Minervini Trend Template

8/8 ✓

Grades the price structure — moving-average stacking, distance from the 52-week high/low, and relative strength above the ≥70 uptrend bar. This is the technical trend check; the company's fundamentals and ≥80 RS leadership are scored separately in the Grade Card.

Price above SMA 150 & 200 $163.23 vs SMA150 $134.64 / SMA200 $132.59
SMA 150 above SMA 200 SMA150 $134.64 vs SMA200 $132.59
SMA 200 trending up Slope +0.65 over 20 days
SMA 50 above SMA 150 & 200 SMA50 $145.04
Price above SMA 50 $163.23 vs SMA50 $145.04
30%+ above 52-week low +68.1% from $97.12
Within 25% of 52-week high -1.8% from $166.15
RS score above 70 RS 72

Fundamentals

52W Range
96%
Mkt Cap SEC
20.4B
EPS QoQ
-11%
Rev YoY
+7%
ROE
42%
Gross Margin
22%
D/E
2.16
EPS TTM
$8.08
P/E TTM
20.2x
Float
125M
Insider
No Buy

Company

Company profile
CDW Corporation
CDW · NASDAQ · Technology Services · Information Technology Services
O'Neil · Grade Card
CANSLIM — current EPS, annual EPS, new highs, supply, leader RS, inst. sponsorship, market
B 68.8* CANSLIM * disqualified on C, M
C · Curr. EPS
38
A · Annual EPS
89
N · New Highs
100
S · Supply/Demand
55
L · Leader RS
72
I · Inst. Spons.
100
M · Market
30

Weekly Context

Multi-timeframe signals from weekly bars
W. Trend
8/8
W. RS
72
W. Support
$97.12
W. Resist
$166.15
W. Patterns
Base Breakout
Weekly Structure

Scan History

20× streak
Oct 23: 55 (Descending Triangle)Oct 23: 85 (Cup & Handle)Oct 26: 55 (Cup & Handle)Oct 27: 71 (Cup & Handle)71
Oct 27
Cup & Handle ✓ Gate
71
Oct 26
Cup & Handle ✓ Gate
55 0.0%
Oct 23
Cup & Handle ✓ Gate
85 -1.1%
Oct 23
Descending Triangle ✓ Gate
55 -1.1%

Latest News

Headlines for CDW
Loading headlines…

Get the full picture on CDW

Pro members see entry/stop/target levels, R:R ratios, intraday alerts, and every setup detected across 500+ symbols daily.

Start 7-Day Free Trial