Uptrend Under Pressure 100
Institutional selling is building — 7 distribution days in the last 25 sessions. Severe risk · 100/100 · 7 distribution days (SPY) Oct 26 Full briefing →
View
Simple research view

ETHA

$52.34 -3.22% Oct 26 close
Detected setup watchlist_candidate · Setup Score 0/100

Stand aside — setup invalidated

Setup score 0, but distribution days reach 5 or more — stand aside until the condition resets.

Ask about ETHA

Switch to Advanced for indicator panels, raw grades, provenance, drawing tools, and full technical tables.

$ETHA

etf Stage 2 · Advancing Base 1
$52.34 latest close
Market Structure
Trend structure: downtrend
Latest event: structure_shift (bearish)
Support 40.80–41.01 · 3 touches · moderate
Support 41.76–41.91 · 3 touches · moderate
Resistance 62.73–62.91 · 3 touches · moderate
Resistance 57.11–57.42 · 3 touches · moderate
Momentum Turn Watch
Bollinger Lower-Band Support Price ($52.34) is holding just above the lower Bollinger band ($51.20; %B 10) — support at the bottom of the bands.
Early technical context only. Wait for price, volume, and the canonical setup trigger to confirm; this signal does not change readiness or the setup score.
Historical record

No active setup in the latest scan — this page shows the last detection Legend AI made for $ETHA. Every level, score and criterion below is computed from the Oct 26 close session (latest session), and may no longer hold.

Historical verdict · setup score 0/100 · data Oct 26 close · latest session

Stand aside — setup invalidated

Setup score 0, but distribution days reach 5 or more — stand aside until the condition resets.

Recent price action · daily
$50.00$60.00AugSepOct$52.34

What would change this verdict

What needs to turn for this to become buyable — the top failing checks across the legend council:

  • Minervini 1.2 150-day MA > 200-day MA — MA150 $48.84 vs MA200 $49.97
  • Minervini 1.5 Price > 50-day MA — Price $52.34 vs MA50 $56.24
  • O'Neil L: RS rank ≥ 80 (IBD leadership) — RS rank 48
  • O'Neil N: Near 52-week high or RS line new high — 45.6% below high | RS line new high: False
  • Weinstein Volume expansion above average — Volume ratio 0.52x
  • Weinstein Not extended from 52-week high (≤ 30% below) — 45.6% below 52-week high
Minority view — the council disagrees here
  • Minervini: avoid Trend-template read: fails 150-day MA > 200-day MA.
  • O'Neil: avoid CANSLIM read: fails L: RS rank ≥ 80 (IBD leadership).
  • Weinstein: watch Stage-analysis read: Stage 2 is present; 4 supporting checks need improvement.
45 Weak
Legend Score · rates the stock Weak (45/100) — held back by institutional footprint

Our proprietary 0-100 rating — the answer to Wall Street's black-box scores. Five pillars, each computed from real scan data, each explained below in plain English.

  • Relative Strength (25%) 48
  • Trend Template (25%) 50
  • Institutional Footprint (20%) 29
  • EPS Growth (15%) 50
  • Quality (SMR-like) (15%) 50

RS rank 48: middle of the pack — no leadership yet. Trend template 4/8: mixed — some uptrend elements, some missing. Institutional score 29: mild distribution — sellers active. No recent earnings growth data — scored neutral. No sales/ROE data — scored neutral. Updated 2026-10-22.

Price $52.34 -3.2% Oct 26 close
52W High $96.15 41.3% below high
Wks Since High 49w 50w today
Base Depth 63.0% 64.1% today
RS Rank 11 percentile of scan
SMA 50 $56.24
Avg Vol 13,508,110
Rel Vol (Oct 26) 0.52× 0.45× on up days
More stats
52W Low $34.56
Tight Wks 0 1 today
Base B1
SMA 200 $49.97
RS Line vs High -47.5%
RS Line Slope -8.2% ▼
ADR% 2.6%
ATR(14) $2.07 (4.0%)
Vol Pace (live) N/A
A/D Days 10A / 6D
A/D Rating A
VDU Bars 0/10 d
Position in 52-week range 29thpercentile of the 52-week range
$34.56low
$96.15high

ETHA Chart

Interactive price, volume, RS, RSI, and MACD charts are available after sign in.

Create a free account to load the full interactive chart for ETHA.

Create Free Account

Technical Analysis Report Card

$ETHA · $52.34 · as of 2026-10-26 · multi-factor read
30
/ 100
Technicals 30/100
Reference read from price & volume only — the verdict at the top of the page decides the action.

Trend · Daily / Weekly / Monthly

Daily ▼ Weak / rolling over
Weekly ▬ Sideways / consolidating
Monthly ▬ Sideways / consolidating

Moving Averages

50-day$56.24 ↓
100-day$48.36 ↑
200-day$49.97 ↑
Bullish (50 > 200)

RSI (14)

Reading37.5 · Bearish

Bearish momentum — sellers in control.

MACD (12/26/9)

StateBearish
Histogram-0.641

Bearish — MACD below its signal line and below zero. Histogram contracting.

Bollinger Bands (20,2)

%B / Width10% · 20.2%

Near the lower band — under pressure or oversold.

Volume · Buyer vs Seller

Up/Down vol0.45 · Distribution
Rel volume0.52×
Pocket pivots · 10d0
5d vs 50d vol56% · Dry-up
Heavy vol up / down0 / 2

Distribution — volume is concentrated on down days; sellers dominate. Recent volume is easing versus its baseline.

  • Volume dry-up — the last 5 sessions averaged 56% of normal; sellers have gone quiet.
  • 2 heavy-volume down days vs 0 up in the last 20 sessions — supply is showing.

Support & Resistance

R · $54.39swing level
R · $55.92swing level
R · $57.42swing level
Price · $52.34now
S · $50.25swing level
S · $41.73swing level
S · $34.7152-week low

Fibonacci · Uptrend swing

23.6%$56.17
38.2% ◄ price here$52.04
50.0%$48.70
61.8%$45.37
78.6%$40.61

Retracement support zones measured from the recent swing low up to the high.

The verdict is free. The trade plan is Pro.
Unlock the exact entry, stop-loss, profit target, and reward-to-risk for ETHA — plus the full 500+ symbol scanner and Ask-the-Legends chat.
Start your 7-day free trial →
Daily downtrendAbove 200-day MA50/200 bullishVolume distribution
Want this read in a legend's voice? Ask a Legend about ETHA
Generic technical analysis generated mechanically from price & volume — educational research only, not financial advice or a personalized recommendation. Levels are illustrative; confirm on your own chart. New to these terms? →
Legend Verdicts 6 methodology checks

Who would consider this setup, why it qualifies, and what blocks it — calculated from the same deterministic methodology rules used across Legend AI.
How to read the numbers: the setup score (0/100, in the verdict band) rates this trade setup. Each legend's A–D grade rates the same setup against that legend's own checklist — so a high score next to a C grade is not a contradiction. The setup can be strong without fitting that legend's style. When the council disagrees, the verdict band breaks the tie.

Council consensus: 5 of 9 legends are Watching — building, not yet a confirmed buy.
Minervini Avoid D Trend-template read: fails 150-day MA > 200-day MA.
Passing evidence
1.1 Price > 150-day MA AND 200-day MAPrice $52.34, MA150 $48.84, MA200 $49.97
1.4 50-day MA > 150-day MA AND 200-day MAMA50 $56.24, MA150 $48.84, MA200 $49.97
Failing evidence
1.2 150-day MA > 200-day MAMA150 $48.84 vs MA200 $49.97
1.5 Price > 50-day MAPrice $52.34 vs MA50 $56.24
Not applicable
2. Quarterly EPS growth ≥ 25%No single-company earnings — not applicable to ETFs
2. ROE ≥ 17%No single-company earnings — not applicable to ETFs
2. Revenue growth ≥ 20% YoYNo single-company earnings — not applicable to ETFs
3/7 checks
O'Neil Avoid D CANSLIM read: fails L: RS rank ≥ 80 (IBD leadership).
Passing evidence
S: Base tightness (ATR% ≤ 4.5%)ATR% 3.96%
Failing evidence
L: RS rank ≥ 80 (IBD leadership)RS rank 48
N: Near 52-week high or RS line new high45.6% below high | RS line new high: False
Not applicable
C: Quarterly EPS acceleration ≥ 25%No single-company earnings — not applicable to ETFs
A: Annual earnings & revenue qualityNo single-company earnings — not applicable to ETFs
1/6 checks
Weinstein Watch D Stage-analysis read: Stage 2 is present; 4 supporting checks need improvement.

partialStage 2 uptrend in progress — hold as long as price stays above the 30-week moving average.

Passing evidence
Stage 2 (Advancing phase) confirmedStage 2 (Advancing)
Price above 30-week MA (200-day proxy)Price $52.34 vs MA200 $49.97
Failing evidence
Volume expansion above averageVolume ratio 0.52x
Not extended from 52-week high (≤ 30% below)45.6% below 52-week high
2/6 checks
dennis Avoid C Turtle read: price broke below the 20-day channel. The long system has no signal here.
Passing evidence
Volatility-unit sizing (1N ≈ 1% of equity)1N = $1.96 (3.74% of price); the Turtles size 1 unit so a 1N move ≈ 1% of equity, making the 2N stop ≈ 2% equity risk
Pyramid plan: adds at 0.5N, max 4 unitsAdd levels $53.32, $54.30, $55.28
Failing evidence
No breakdown below the 20-day channel20-day low $52.49
S1: 20-day Donchian breakoutNot confirmed
4/7 checks
zanger Avoid D Zanger read: a hard gate is broken — either the pattern is not one of his six, or the entry is more than 5% past the breakout. He would not touch this.
Passing evidence
Partial-profit plan: sell 20-30% at +15-20%Scale 20-30% at $60.19-$62.81; trail the rest
Trail on the 10/20-day MA10-day MA $54.74 · 20-day MA $56.95 — exit the remainder on a close below the trail
Failing evidence
Named Zanger pattern onlywatchlist_candidate is not one of Zanger's six
Not extended (≤5% above the breakout point)Data unavailable
3/6 checks
zweig Watch D Zweig read: part of his screen passes but not all: Price strength (RS ≥ 70) — wait for the full growth screen before treating this as a Zweig setup.
Passing evidence
Breadth momentum: 10-day A/D ratio10-day A/D 1.17 (2025 adv / 1725 dec) — participation expanding
4% Model (breadth proxy)63% of universe above 50-day — broad strength (adapted from Ned Davis 4% Model)
Failing evidence
Price strength (RS ≥ 70)RS score 48 — Zweig buys strength, not bargains
Monetary conditions: don't fight the FedFed series stored but too thin to read direction
Not applicable
EPS growth above the marketNo single-company earnings — not applicable to ETFs
Reasonable price for the growthNo single-company earnings — not applicable to ETFs
Insider buyingNo single-company earnings — not applicable to ETFs
2/5 checks
Livermore Watch C Pivotal-point read: constructive evidence is present, but relative strength is unresolved.
Passing evidence
Price$52.34
Detected patternwatchlist_candidate
Failing evidence
Relative strengthRS 48
Volume vs average0.52x
2/6 checks
Darvas Watch C Box-theory read: constructive evidence is present, but relative strength is unresolved.
Passing evidence
Price$52.34
Detected patternwatchlist_candidate
Failing evidence
Relative strengthRS 48
Volume vs average0.52x
2/6 checks
Wyckoff Watch C Supply-and-demand read: constructive evidence is present, but relative strength is unresolved.
Passing evidence
Price$52.34
Detected patternwatchlist_candidate
Failing evidence
Relative strengthRS 48
Volume vs average0.52x
2/6 checks
Base & Breakout
Breakout follow-through

No active breakout tracked — Legend AI monitors daily for pivot-point breaks. What's a breakout?

Latest candle: Doji — Open and close nearly equal — indecision. After a strong move it can signal a pause or pending reversal; wait for confirmation.

RS Line vs SPY 52-week relative strength · blue = RS line · dashed = MA50 · dot = NH ▼ Falling
49RS Line (52W)
Accumulation / Distribution last 65 sessions · green = acc on high vol · red = dist on high vol Net +1 A
A: 14 D: 13 Net: +165 sessions
Minervini · Grade Card
Fundamentals & leadership quality — Minervini’s published criteria · 1/3 met · earnings criteria N/A for ETFs
C 1/3 criteria
Separate score from the Minervini Trend Template (3/8): the Trend Template grades the price structure, this grades the company & leadership (earnings, sales, margins, RS rank). A stock can ride a clean trend while its fundamentals lag, so the two often differ by design — they are not the same checklist.
– EPS acceleration ≥25% QoQ N/A
– Revenue growth ≥20% YoY N/A
– Gross margin ≥30% N/A
– ROE ≥17% N/A
✗ RS rating ≥80 (leadership) 48
✓ Stage 2 uptrend (Weinstein) Stage 2
✗ Within 25% of 52W high -45.6%

Method Playbook

Trade it like Wyckoff EXACT LEVELS · PRO
Wyckoff C · Watch — The deterministic methodology check is Watch; wait for the failing or incomplete criteria to improve before the trigger can qualify.
Pivot
Pro level
Published-method rule: Use the Spring/test, Sign of Strength, creek, or Last Point of Support boundary identified by the active structure.
Evidence: Canonical setup geometry is available with Pro.
Entry trigger
Pro level
Published-method rule: Require a completed test or Sign of Strength/Last Point of Support confirmation with improving demand versus supply.
Evidence: Canonical setup geometry is available with Pro.
Initial stop
Pro level
Published-method rule: Start below the Spring/test low or structural support whose failure would invalidate the accumulation read.
Evidence: Canonical setup geometry is available with Pro.
Trail
Rule-based
Published-method rule: Raise protection beneath successive Last Points of Support or meaningful higher lows during markup; never loosen it.
Evidence: Planned management rule; no stored stop or broker order is changed automatically.
Exit / invalidation
Pro level
Published-method rule: Exit on a failed Sign of Strength, support loss, or clear supply-dominant reversal such as an upthrust failure.
Evidence: Canonical setup geometry is available with Pro.
Deterministic educational plan, not a recommendation. No order or stop is changed automatically. Method and sources →

Pattern Analysis (historical)

0 setup score
RS Score 48
Trend template 3/8
Why This Setup?
watchlist_candidate · schematic

Near-miss 4/8 — needs: sma150 above sma200, sma200 trending up, price within 25pct of 52w high, rs score above 70

The Universal Edge Check · context only

What the setup still has going for it, recorded for later. The verdict above stands — these principles do not overrule it.

1/7 universals met
  • A relative-strength leader — not met RS rank 11 — laggard
  • Risk is defined — not met No stop — undefined risk
  • Asymmetric reward — partly met No target set
  • Clear of earnings — partly met Report date unknown
  • Not chasing (in range) — partly met Pivot distance unknown
  • Volume confirms — partly met 0.7× average — light
  • In a confirmed uptrend — met Stage 2 · Trend template 3/8
Why these seven? → The Universal Edge

Minervini Trend Template

3/8

Grades the price structure — moving-average stacking, distance from the 52-week high/low, and relative strength above the ≥70 uptrend bar. This is the technical trend check; the company's fundamentals and ≥80 RS leadership are scored separately in the Grade Card.

Price above SMA 150 & 200 $52.34 vs SMA150 $48.84 / SMA200 $49.97
SMA 150 above SMA 200 SMA150 $48.84 vs SMA200 $49.97
SMA 200 trending up Slope -1.18 over 20 days
SMA 50 above SMA 150 & 200 SMA50 $56.24
Price above SMA 50 $52.34 vs SMA50 $56.24
30%+ above 52-week low +51.4% from $34.56
Within 25% of 52-week high -45.6% from $96.15
RS score above 70 RS 48

Fundamentals

52W Range
29%
Insider
No Buy

Company

Company profile
ETHA
ETHA

Scan History

Oct 14: 0 (watchlist_candidate)Oct 15: 55 (Golden Cross)Oct 16: 55 (Golden Cross)Oct 22: 0 (watchlist_candidate)0
Oct 22
watchlist_candidate
0
Oct 16
Golden Cross
55 -4.0%
Oct 15
Golden Cross
55 -5.5%
Oct 14
watchlist_candidate
0 -4.6%

Latest News

Headlines for ETHA
Loading headlines…

Get the full picture on ETHA

Pro members see entry/stop/target levels, R:R ratios, intraday alerts, and every setup detected across 500+ symbols daily.

Start 7-Day Free Trial