Triggers when price crosses your target during market hours or after the next daily scan. Delivered via email and Telegram (if linked in Account).
Historical record
No active setup in the latest scan — this page shows the last detection Legend AI made for $EXPE.
Every level, score and criterion below is computed from the Oct 26 close session (latest session), and may no longer hold.
Historical verdict · setup score 55/100 · data Oct 26 close · latest session
Stand aside — setup invalidated
Setup score 55, but price closes below stop $324.26 — stand aside until the condition resets.
Weinstein: watchStage-analysis read: Stage 2 is present; 2 supporting checks need improvement.
63Neutral
Legend Score · rates the stockNeutral (63/100) — held back by eps growth
Our proprietary 0-100 rating — the answer to Wall Street's black-box scores. Five pillars, each computed from real scan data, each explained below in plain English.
Next earnings
Thursday, October 29, 2026Report time not confirmed by the source
Ordinary position sizing suppressed.
Earnings are less than three full trading sessions away; treat the gap as event risk, not ordinary stop-distance risk.
Deterministic evidence
EXPE-1.74%
Sector proxy · XLY+1.03%
Broad market · SPY+0.71%
Same completed session window ending 2026-10-26.
EXPE was -2.77 points vs XLY.
-2.45 points vs SPY.
QQQ, SMH moved against the stock — no index confirmation.
A sourced earnings report is still pending inside the risk window; ordinary technical conviction is reduced until it is out.
Price bars, sourced event fields, and benchmark math only. This can adjust displayed short-term conviction; it does not change the stored scanner score or readiness.
Generic technical analysis generated mechanically from price & volume — educational research only, not financial advice or a personalized recommendation. Levels are illustrative; confirm on your own chart. New to these terms? →
Legend Verdicts6 methodology checks
Who would consider this setup, why it qualifies, and what blocks it — calculated from the same deterministic methodology rules used across Legend AI. How to read the numbers: the setup score (55/100, in the verdict band) rates this trade setup. Each legend's A–D grade rates the same setup against that legend's own checklist — so a high score next to a C grade is not a contradiction. The setup can be strong without fitting that legend's style. When the council disagrees, the verdict band breaks the tie.
Council consensus:
6 of 9 legends are Watching — building, not yet a confirmed buy.
WeinsteinWatchCStage-analysis read: Stage 2 is present; 2 supporting checks need improvement.
mediumClassic Stage 2 advancing phase — strong weekly trend confirms uptrend. This is Weinstein's sweet spot: buy and hold while price remains above the 30-week MA.
dennisWatchCTurtle read: no Donchian signal. The system stays flat until price takes out the 20-day high.
Passing evidence
✓No breakdown below the 20-day channel20-day low $253.16
✓Volatility-unit sizing (1N ≈ 1% of equity)1N = $12.15 (4.28% of price); the Turtles size 1 unit so a 1N move ≈ 1% of equity, making the 2N stop ≈ 2% equity risk
zangerAvoidCZanger read: a hard gate is broken — either the pattern is not one of his six, or the entry is more than 5% past the breakout. He would not touch this.
Passing evidence
✓Not extended (≤5% above the breakout point)Measured as passing
✓Partial-profit plan: sell 20-30% at +15-20%Scale 20-30% at $326.57-$340.76; trail the rest
Failing evidence
✕Named Zanger pattern onlyCup (no handle) is not one of Zanger's six
zweigWatchDZweig read: part of his screen passes but not all: EPS growth above the market (≥15% QoQ); Insider buying — wait for the full growth screen before treating this as a Zweig setup.
Passing evidence
✓Reasonable price for the growth (P/E ≤ 35)Trailing P/E 28.9x — no PEG or forward P/E stored
Fundamentals & leadership quality — Minervini’s published criteria · 4/7 met
B
4/7 criteria
Separate score from the Minervini Trend Template (6/8): the Trend Template grades the price structure, this grades the company & leadership (earnings, sales, margins, RS rank). A stock can ride a clean trend while its fundamentals lag, so the two often differ by design — they are not the same checklist.
Darvas B · Watch — The deterministic methodology check is Watch; wait for the failing or incomplete criteria to improve before the trigger can qualify.
Pivot
Pro level
Published-method rule: Use the top of the active Darvas box near the high as the mechanical breakout boundary. Evidence: Canonical setup geometry is available with Pro.
Entry trigger
Pro level
Published-method rule: Require price to clear the box top with volume confirmation; movement inside the box remains observation, not a trigger. Evidence: Canonical setup geometry is available with Pro.
Initial stop
Pro level
Published-method rule: Start below the active box support or the canonical structural stop that proves the breakout failed. Evidence: Canonical setup geometry is available with Pro.
Trail
Rule-based
Published-method rule: As higher boxes form, raise the stop beneath the newest confirmed box floor; the stop moves up only. Evidence: Planned management rule; no stored stop or broker order is changed automatically.
Exit / invalidation
Pro level
Published-method rule: Exit when price breaks the active box floor or decisively falls back through the breakout structure. Evidence: Canonical setup geometry is available with Pro.
Deterministic educational plan, not a recommendation. No order or stop is changed automatically. Method and sources →
Possible head & shoulders top — not confirmed. Watch for a daily close below ~226.98 (neckline) to confirm, with measured-move risk toward ~111.96. A push back above 301.81 weakens the pattern; reclaiming 342.00 invalidates it.
Confirms below226.98
Invalidates at342.00
Left Shoulder335.00
Head342.00
Right Shoulder301.81
Neckline226.98
Target111.96
LS 335.00 / head 342.00 / RS 301.81, neckline ~226.98, vol_fading=no
Predictive pattern recognition is educational — most forming structures never confirm. Wait for the confirmation level before treating this as a setup.
Grades the price structure — moving-average stacking, distance from the 52-week high/low, and relative strength above the ≥70 uptrend bar. This is the technical trend check; the company's fundamentals and ≥80 RS leadership are scored separately in the Grade Card.
✓
Price above SMA 150 & 200$283.97 vs SMA150 $264.95 / SMA200 $259.34
✓
SMA 150 above SMA 200SMA150 $264.95 vs SMA200 $259.34
✗
SMA 200 trending upSlope -1.01 over 20 days
✓
SMA 50 above SMA 150 & 200SMA50 $289.54
✗
Price above SMA 50$283.97 vs SMA50 $289.54
✓
30%+ above 52-week low+53.2% from $185.34
✓
Within 25% of 52-week high-17.0% from $342.00
✓
RS score above 70RS 72
Fundamentals
52W Range
63%
Mkt Cap SEC
32.5B
EPS QoQ
-48%
Rev YoY
+8%
ROE
148%
Gross Margin
90%
D/E
4.80
EPS TTM
$9.81
P/E TTM
28.9x
Float
114M
Insider
No Buy
Company
Company profile
Expedia Group, Inc.
EXPE · NASDAQ
· Consumer Services
· Other Consumer Services