Switch to Advanced for indicator panels, raw grades, provenance, drawing tools, and full technical tables.
$IGV
etfStage 2 · AdvancingBase 2
$111.39latest close
⚠ Risk Signals
Double TopDouble Top (forming): peaks $110.57 and $113.70 (2026-10-12) with the neckline at $100.59. neckline $100.59 intact (10.7% above it). Measured move targets $89.05; invalidation above $115.97. Research/educational only, not a buy/sell recommendation.
Bearish RSI DivergencePrice higher high ($110.32→$112.67) but RSI lower high (70→66) — momentum diverging
Bearish MACD DivergencePrice higher high ($110.32→$112.67) but MACD lower high (3.19→1.95) — momentum diverging
Bearish structure on the daily chart — a heads-up for anyone holding, not a short signal. Does not affect the bullish setup score.
Market Structure
Trend structure:range
Latest event:structure_shift(bullish)
Support
86.78–87.50
· 4 touches · moderate
Support
106.75–107.30
· 4 touches · moderate
Support
103.48–103.75
· 4 touches · moderate
Support
88.58–89.04
· 3 touches · moderate
Momentum Turn Watch
Bollinger SqueezeBollinger band width (8.2%) is in the bottom quartile of its last 120 sessions — Legend's width-percentile squeeze (not a TTM/Keltner squeeze), so volatility is compressed and a sharper move often follows.
Early technical context only. Wait for price, volume, and the canonical setup trigger to confirm; this signal does not change readiness or the setup score.
Weinstein: watchStage-analysis read: Stage 2 is present; 2 supporting checks need improvement.
69Strong
Legend Score · rates the stockStrong (69/100) — held back by institutional footprint
Our proprietary 0-100 rating — the answer to Wall Street's black-box scores. Five pillars, each computed from real scan data, each explained below in plain English.
Relative Strength (25%)76
Trend Template (25%)100
Institutional Footprint (20%)50
EPS Growth (15%)50
Quality (SMR-like) (15%)50
RS rank 75: above-average strength. Trend template 8/8: price above rising 50/150/200-day lines — textbook uptrend structure. Institutional score 50: neutral — no clear institutional conviction. No recent earnings growth data — scored neutral. No sales/ROE data — scored neutral.
Updated 2026-10-27.
Price$111.39 +0.7%Oct 26 close
52W High$117.765.4% below high
Wks Since High49w
Base Depth37.2%
RS Rank47percentile of scan
SMA 50$106.45
Avg Vol8,693,047
Rel Vol (Oct 26)0.63×1.52× on up days
More stats
52W Low$73.93
Tight Wks1
BaseB2
SMA 200$93.85
RS Line vs High-15.0%
RS Line Slope+5.7% ▲
ADR%2.3%
ATR(14)$2.88 (2.6%)
Vol Pace (live)N/A
A/D Days17A / 15D
A/D RatingB
VDU Bars0/10 d
Power Trend4d
Position in 52-week range85thpercentile of the 52-week range
$73.93low
$117.76high
IGV Chart
Interactive price, volume, RS, RSI, and MACD charts are available after sign in.
Create a free account to load the full interactive chart for IGV.
Generic technical analysis generated mechanically from price & volume — educational research only, not financial advice or a personalized recommendation. Levels are illustrative; confirm on your own chart. New to these terms? →
Legend Verdicts6 methodology checks
Who would consider this setup, why it qualifies, and what blocks it — calculated from the same deterministic methodology rules used across Legend AI. How to read the numbers: the setup score (55/100, in the verdict band) rates this trade setup. Each legend's A–D grade rates the same setup against that legend's own checklist — so a high score next to a C grade is not a contradiction. The setup can be strong without fitting that legend's style. When the council disagrees, the verdict band breaks the tie.
Council consensus:
1 legend rates this Buyable · 7 watching · 1 avoid.
MinerviniBuyableATrend-template read: all 9 measured criteria pass.
Passing evidence
✓1.1 Price > 150-day MA AND 200-day MAPrice $111.39, MA150 $95.79, MA200 $93.85
✓1.2 150-day MA > 200-day MAMA150 $95.79 vs MA200 $93.85
Failing evidence
No failing criteria.
Not applicable
–2. Quarterly EPS growth ≥ 25%No single-company earnings — not applicable to ETFs
–2. ROE ≥ 17%No single-company earnings — not applicable to ETFs
–2. Revenue growth ≥ 20% YoYNo single-company earnings — not applicable to ETFs
WeinsteinWatchCStage-analysis read: Stage 2 is present; 2 supporting checks need improvement.
mediumClassic Stage 2 advancing phase — strong weekly trend confirms uptrend. This is Weinstein's sweet spot: buy and hold while price remains above the 30-week MA.
dennisWatchCTurtle read: no breakout yet. Price is pressing the 20-day high. The system waits for the print; it never anticipates.
Passing evidence
✓No breakdown below the 20-day channel20-day low $103.57
✓Volatility-unit sizing (1N ≈ 1% of equity)1N = $2.69 (2.42% of price); the Turtles size 1 unit so a 1N move ≈ 1% of equity, making the 2N stop ≈ 2% equity risk
zangerWatchBZanger read: the structure is fine but the breakout quality is not there yet — wait for 150%+ volume on the break.
partialZanger would buy the Cup & Handle breakout only with 150-200% volume, never more than 5% above the breakout point, with a 2-3% stop set at entry. His edge over O'Neil is the exit plan: sell 20-30% of the position at +15-20%, then trail the rest on the 10/20-day moving average.
Passing evidence
✓Named Zanger pattern onlyCup & Handle
✓Not extended (≤5% above the breakout point)Measured as passing
zweigWatchAZweig read: passes his full growth screen — earnings growing faster than the market, a price that is reasonable for that growth, insiders buying, and price strength. Super Model timing — timing tailwinds: Breadth momentum, 4% Model (breadth proxy); 2 timing leg(s) lack data.
No active breakout tracked — Legend AI monitors daily for pivot-point breaks.
What's a breakout?
Latest candle: Hammer — Long lower shadow with a small body near the high — buyers rejected lower prices. Bullish when it appears at support or after a pullback.
Fundamentals & leadership quality — Minervini’s published criteria · 2/3 met · earnings criteria N/A for ETFs
A
2/3 criteria
Separate score from the Minervini Trend Template (8/8): the Trend Template grades the price structure, this grades the company & leadership (earnings, sales, margins, RS rank). A stock can ride a clean trend while its fundamentals lag, so the two often differ by design — they are not the same checklist.
Minervini A · Buyable — The deterministic methodology check is Buyable; the trigger still requires the stated price and volume confirmation.
Pivot
Pro level
Published-method rule: Use the tight base's structural pivot; the setup must retain Trend Template leadership into the trigger. Evidence: Canonical setup geometry is available with Pro.
Entry trigger
Pro level
Published-method rule: Require a decisive move through the pivot with volume confirmation, and do not initiate more than 5% above it. Evidence: Canonical setup geometry is available with Pro.
Initial stop
Pro level
Published-method rule: Start at the tighter structural invalidation; the initial loss limit must not exceed roughly 7–8% from entry. Evidence: Canonical setup geometry is available with Pro.
Trail
Rule-based
Published-method rule: Hold the initial stop until the trade proves itself; near +1R move to breakeven, then trail a higher low or rising 10/21-day average once well extended. Evidence: Planned management rule; no stored stop or broker order is changed automatically.
Exit / invalidation
Pro level
Published-method rule: Exit when the structural stop or a meaningful higher-low/short-term trend violation fires; never widen the stop. Evidence: Canonical setup geometry is available with Pro.
Deterministic educational plan, not a recommendation. No order or stop is changed automatically. Method and sources →
Possible head & shoulders top — not confirmed. Watch for a daily close below ~104.44 (neckline) to confirm, with measured-move risk toward ~95.18. A push back above 111.88 weakens the pattern; reclaiming 113.70 invalidates it.
Confirms below104.44
Invalidates at113.70
Left Shoulder110.57
Head113.70
Right Shoulder111.88
Neckline104.44
Target95.18
LS 110.57 / head 113.70 / RS 111.88, neckline ~104.44, vol_fading=no
Predictive pattern recognition is educational — most forming structures never confirm. Wait for the confirmation level before treating this as a setup.
Pattern Analysis
Cup & Handle
Historical replay: +20% before −8% within 40 sessions: 16% (n=376) · source bars 2024-11-01–2026-10-26 · avg +0.3% per setup (+0.03R)
⚠ Volatility widening into breakout⚠ Bearish RSI divergence⚠ Not actionable yet
55setup score
RS Score75
Trend template8/8 ✓
CANSLIM68.8* (B)
18.3% cup depth8.8% handle
Cup 18.3% deep from a $103.23 left rim to a $84.29 low
Rims 7.1% apart (ideal, within 10%)
Handle pulled back 8.8% over 4 bars from $113.70 to $103.72
Grades the price structure — moving-average stacking, distance from the 52-week high/low, and relative strength above the ≥70 uptrend bar. This is the technical trend check; the company's fundamentals and ≥80 RS leadership are scored separately in the Grade Card.
✓
Price above SMA 150 & 200$111.39 vs SMA150 $95.79 / SMA200 $93.85
✓
SMA 150 above SMA 200SMA150 $95.79 vs SMA200 $93.85
ETFs hold baskets of stocks — earnings and insider criteria don't apply. This grades new highs, supply/demand, relative-strength leadership, and market direction instead.
Weekly Context
Multi-timeframe signals from weekly bars
W. Trend
8/8
W. RS
70
W. Support
$82.18
W. Resist
$113.70
W. Patterns
Cup & Handle
Weekly Structure
Trend
Neutral
Tight Weeks
1
Confirmation
Neutral
Scan History
20× streak
Oct 27
Cup & Handle✓ Gate
55
Oct 26
Cup & Handle✓ Gate
550.0%
Oct 23
Cup & Handle✓ Gate
70+0.7%
Latest News
Headlines for IGV
Loading headlines…
Get the full picture on IGV
Pro members see entry/stop/target levels, R:R ratios, intraday alerts, and every setup detected across 500+ symbols daily.