Uptrend Under Pressure 100
Institutional selling is building — 7 distribution days in the last 25 sessions. Severe risk · 100/100 · 7 distribution days (SPY) Oct 26 Full briefing →
View
Simple research view

NEM · Newmont Corporation

$110.39 +1.40% Oct 26 close
Detected setup Cup & Handle · Setup Score 50/100

Stand aside — setup invalidated

Setup score 50, but price closes below stop $129.18 — stand aside until the condition resets.

Ask about NEM

Switch to Advanced for indicator panels, raw grades, provenance, drawing tools, and full technical tables.

$NEM

Newmont Corporation

Newmont Corporation is a large-cap Precious Metals company in the Non-Energy Minerals sector with a market cap of $115B.

Non-Energy Minerals Precious Metals stock Stage 1 · Basing Base 2
$110.39 latest close
Market Structure
Trend structure: range
Latest event: structure_shift (bullish)
Resistance 111.28–112.18 · 4 touches · moderate
Resistance 120.00–120.83 · 4 touches · moderate
Resistance 121.26–122.00 · 3 touches · moderate
Support 109.30–109.83 · 3 touches · moderate
Momentum Turn Watch
Bollinger Squeeze + Lower-Band Support Bollinger band width (8.8%) is in the bottom quartile of its last 120 sessions — Legend's width-percentile squeeze (not a TTM/Keltner squeeze), so volatility is compressed and a sharper move often follows. Price ($110.39) is holding just above the lower Bollinger band ($110.20; %B 2) — support at the bottom of the bands.
Early technical context only. Wait for price, volume, and the canonical setup trigger to confirm; this signal does not change readiness or the setup score.
Historical record

No active setup in the latest scan — this page shows the last detection Legend AI made for $NEM. Every level, score and criterion below is computed from the Oct 26 close session (latest session), and may no longer hold.

Historical verdict · setup score 50/100 · data Oct 26 close · latest session

Stand aside — setup invalidated

Setup score 50, but price closes below stop $129.18 — stand aside until the condition resets.

Recent price action · daily
$100$120AugSepOct$110

What would change this verdict

What needs to turn for this to become buyable — the top failing checks across the legend council:

  • Minervini 1.1 Price > 150-day MA AND 200-day MA — Price $110.39, MA150 $110.70, MA200 $112.47
  • Minervini 1.2 150-day MA > 200-day MA — MA150 $110.70 vs MA200 $112.47
  • O'Neil C: Quarterly EPS acceleration ≥ 25% — +15.1% QoQ
  • O'Neil N: Near 52-week high or RS line new high — 18.4% below high | RS line new high: False
  • Weinstein Price above 30-week MA (200-day proxy) — Price $110.39 vs MA200 $112.47
  • Weinstein Volume expansion above average — Volume ratio 1.08x
Minority view — the council disagrees here
  • Minervini: avoid Trend-template read: fails Price > 150-day MA AND 200-day MA.
  • O'Neil: avoid CANSLIM read: fails C: Quarterly EPS acceleration ≥ 25%.
  • Weinstein: watch Stage-analysis read: Stage 2 is present; 2 supporting checks need improvement.
62 Neutral
Legend Score · rates the stock Neutral (62/100) — held back by eps growth

Our proprietary 0-100 rating — the answer to Wall Street's black-box scores. Five pillars, each computed from real scan data, each explained below in plain English.

  • Relative Strength (25%) 83
  • Trend Template (25%) 88
  • Institutional Footprint (20%) 38
  • EPS Growth (15%) 30
  • Quality (SMR-like) (15%) 44

RS rank 82: beating most of the market. Trend template 7/8: price above rising 50/150/200-day lines — textbook uptrend structure. Institutional score 38: mild distribution — sellers active. EPS up +0% — growing, but below the 25% leadership bar. Quality 44: weak fundamentals (sales growth 30, return on equity 41, leverage 100). Updated 2026-09-30.

Earnings

Normal technical setup

Next earnings Thursday, October 22, 2026 After market close Exact clock time not supplied by source

Deterministic evidence

Reported EPS 2.2 vs estimate 2.0715 · surprise +6.2%

NEM+1.40%
Sector proxy · XLB+0.14%
Broad market · SPY+0.71%
Same completed session window ending 2026-10-26. NEM was +1.26 points vs XLB. +0.69 points vs SPY.

Session internals Strong momentum

Rule: closed up, at or above the open, in the top third of the day's range. Judged on internals, not on the size of the move.

Vs prior close+1.40% From the open+1.44% Range position96% GapNo gap
QQQ confirmationConfirming (+1.11%) SMH confirmationConfirming (+2.74%)
Price bars, sourced event fields, and benchmark math only. This can adjust displayed short-term conviction; it does not change the stored scanner score or readiness.

Ask a Legend to interpret this evidence → Commentary only — never scanner evidence or a sizing recommendation.

Price $110.39 +1.4% Oct 26 close
52W High $135.29 18.4% below high
Wks Since High 8w
Base Depth 20.9%
RS Rank 63 percentile of scan
SMA 50 $121.52
Avg Vol 6,925,462
Rel Vol (Oct 26) 1.08× 1.31× on up days
More stats
52W Low $76.05
Tight Wks 0
Base B2
SMA 200 $112.47
RS Line vs High -19.2%
RS Line Slope -4.8% ▼
ADR% 2.7%
ATR(14) $3.94 (3.6%)
Vol Pace (live) N/A
A/D Days 14A / 8D
A/D Rating A+
VDU Bars 0/10 d
Earnings past
Position in 52-week range 58thpercentile of the 52-week range
$76.05low
$135.29high

NEM Chart

Interactive price, volume, RS, RSI, and MACD charts are available after sign in.

Create a free account to load the full interactive chart for NEM.

Create Free Account

Technical Analysis Report Card

$NEM · $110.39 · as of 2026-10-26 · multi-factor read
37
/ 100
Technicals 37/100
Reference read from price & volume only — the verdict at the top of the page decides the action.

Trend · Daily / Weekly / Monthly

Daily ▼ Downtrend
Weekly ▬ Sideways / consolidating
Monthly ▬ Sideways / consolidating

Moving Averages

50-day$121.52 ↓
100-day$110.31 ↑
200-day$112.47 ↓
Bullish (50 > 200)

RSI (14)

Reading39.3 · Bearish

Bearish momentum — sellers in control.

MACD (12/26/9)

StateBearish
Histogram-0.477

Bearish — MACD below its signal line and below zero. Histogram contracting.

Bollinger Bands (20,2)

%B / Width2% · 8.8%
Squeeze — volatility compressing

Near the lower band — under pressure or oversold. Bands are squeezing — volatility is compressing, often a precursor to a sharp move.

Volume · Buyer vs Seller

Up/Down vol1.31 · Neutral
Rel volume1.08×
Pocket pivots · 10d1
5d vs 50d vol101%
Heavy vol up / down0 / 0

Balanced — up/down volume is roughly even; no clear hand. Recent volume is easing versus its baseline.

  • Pocket pivot 6 sessions ago — up-day volume beat every down day of the prior 10 sessions.

Support & Resistance

R · $112.06swing level
R · $121.42swing level
R · $128.09swing level
Price · $110.39now
S · $109.83swing level
S · $106.87swing level
S · $103.88swing level

Fibonacci · Uptrend swing

23.6%$124.31
38.2%$117.51
50.0% ◄ price here$112.02
61.8%$106.53
78.6%$98.71

Retracement support zones measured from the recent swing low up to the high.

The verdict is free. The trade plan is Pro.
Unlock the exact entry, stop-loss, profit target, and reward-to-risk for NEM — plus the full 500+ symbol scanner and Ask-the-Legends chat.
Start your 7-day free trial →
Daily downtrendBelow 200-day MA50/200 bullishRS 82 (leader)
Want this read in a legend's voice? Ask a Legend about NEM
Generic technical analysis generated mechanically from price & volume — educational research only, not financial advice or a personalized recommendation. Levels are illustrative; confirm on your own chart. New to these terms? →
Legend Verdicts 6 methodology checks

Who would consider this setup, why it qualifies, and what blocks it — calculated from the same deterministic methodology rules used across Legend AI.
How to read the numbers: the setup score (50/100, in the verdict band) rates this trade setup. Each legend's A–D grade rates the same setup against that legend's own checklist — so a high score next to a C grade is not a contradiction. The setup can be strong without fitting that legend's style. When the council disagrees, the verdict band breaks the tie.

Council consensus: 7 of 9 legends are Watching — building, not yet a confirmed buy.
Minervini Avoid C Trend-template read: fails Price > 150-day MA AND 200-day MA.

partialRule check says AVOID (8/13 checks passed) — Trend-template read: fails Price > 150-day MA AND 200-day MA.

Passing evidence
1.4 50-day MA > 150-day MA AND 200-day MAMA50 $121.52, MA150 $110.70, MA200 $112.47
1.7 Price within 25% of 52-week high18.4% below 52-week high
Failing evidence
1.1 Price > 150-day MA AND 200-day MAPrice $110.39, MA150 $110.70, MA200 $112.47
1.2 150-day MA > 200-day MAMA150 $110.70 vs MA200 $112.47
8/13 checks
O'Neil Avoid D CANSLIM read: fails C: Quarterly EPS acceleration ≥ 25%.

partialRule check says AVOID (3/8 checks passed) — CANSLIM read: fails C: Quarterly EPS acceleration ≥ 25%.

Passing evidence
L: RS rank ≥ 80 (IBD leadership)RS rank 82
A: Annual earnings & revenue qualityRev +21.3% | ROE 25.2%
Failing evidence
C: Quarterly EPS acceleration ≥ 25%+15.1% QoQ
N: Near 52-week high or RS line new high18.4% below high | RS line new high: False
3/8 checks
Weinstein Watch B Stage-analysis read: Stage 2 is present; 2 supporting checks need improvement.

mediumClassic Stage 2 advancing phase — strong weekly trend confirms uptrend. This is Weinstein's sweet spot: buy and hold while price remains above the 30-week MA.

Passing evidence
Stage 2 (Advancing phase) confirmedStage 2 (Advancing)
30-week MA trending upwardFrom weekly scan context
Failing evidence
Price above 30-week MA (200-day proxy)Price $110.39 vs MA200 $112.47
Volume expansion above averageVolume ratio 1.08x
6/8 checks
dennis Watch C Turtle read: no Donchian signal. The system stays flat until price takes out the 20-day high.
Passing evidence
No breakdown below the 20-day channel20-day low $107.81
Volatility-unit sizing (1N ≈ 1% of equity)1N = $3.95 (3.58% of price); the Turtles size 1 unit so a 1N move ≈ 1% of equity, making the 2N stop ≈ 2% equity risk
Failing evidence
S1: 20-day Donchian breakoutNot confirmed
S2: 55-day Donchian breakoutNot confirmed
5/8 checks
zanger Watch B Zanger read: the structure is fine but the breakout quality is not there yet — wait for 150%+ volume on the break.

partialZanger would buy the Cup & Handle breakout only with 150-200% volume, never more than 5% above the breakout point, with a 2-3% stop set at entry. His edge over O'Neil is the exit plan: sell 20-30% of the position at +15-20%, then trail the rest on the 10/20-day moving average.

Passing evidence
Named Zanger pattern onlyCup & Handle
Not extended (≤5% above the breakout point)Measured as passing
Failing evidence
Breakout volume 1.5-2.0x averageNot confirmed
5/6 checks
zweig Watch B Zweig read: part of his screen passes but not all: Insider buying — wait for the full growth screen before treating this as a Zweig setup.
Passing evidence
EPS growth above the market (≥15% QoQ)+15.1% QoQ — Zweig wants growth above the S&P average
Reasonable price for the growth (P/E ≤ 35)Trailing P/E 17.3x — no PEG or forward P/E stored
Failing evidence
Insider buyingNo insider buying flagged
Monetary conditions: don't fight the FedFed series stored but too thin to read direction
5/8 checks
Livermore Watch B Pivotal-point read: constructive evidence is present, but volume vs average is unresolved.
Passing evidence
Price$110.39
Relative strengthRS 82
Failing evidence
Volume vs average1.08x
Pivotal point cleared on expanding volumeNot confirmed
4/6 checks
Darvas Watch B Box-theory read: constructive evidence is present, but volume vs average is unresolved.

partialConsolidating within the box (13.4% from 52W high) — patience until it approaches the prior high.

Passing evidence
Price$110.39
Relative strengthRS 82
Failing evidence
Volume vs average1.08x
Box top broken on heavy volumeNot confirmed
4/6 checks
Wyckoff Watch B Supply-and-demand read: constructive evidence is present, but volume vs average is unresolved.
Passing evidence
Price$110.39
Relative strengthRS 82
Failing evidence
Volume vs average1.08x
Sign of Strength confirmed on expanding volumePrice hasn't cleared the pivot yet — confirmation pending
4/6 checks
Base & Breakout
Breakout follow-through

No active breakout tracked — Legend AI monitors daily for pivot-point breaks. What's a breakout?

Latest candle: Bullish Engulfing — Today's up candle fully engulfs yesterday's down candle — a classic bullish reversal, strongest after a pullback to support.

RS Line vs SPY 52-week relative strength · blue = RS line · dashed = MA50 · dot = NH ▼ Falling
126RS Line (52W)
Accumulation / Distribution last 65 sessions · green = acc on high vol · red = dist on high vol Net +1 A+
A: 15 D: 14 Net: +165 sessions
Minervini · Grade Card
Fundamentals & leadership quality — Minervini’s published criteria · 5/7 met
B 5/7 criteria
Separate score from the Minervini Trend Template (5/8): the Trend Template grades the price structure, this grades the company & leadership (earnings, sales, margins, RS rank). A stock can ride a clean trend while its fundamentals lag, so the two often differ by design — they are not the same checklist.
✗ EPS acceleration ≥25% QoQ +15%
✓ Revenue growth ≥20% YoY +21%
✓ Gross margin ≥30% 68%
✓ ROE ≥17% 25%
✓ RS rating ≥80 (leadership) 82
✗ Stage 2 uptrend (Weinstein) Stage 1
✓ Within 25% of 52W high -18.4%

Method Playbook

Trade it like O'Neil EXACT LEVELS · PRO
O'Neil D · Avoid — The deterministic methodology check is Avoid; wait until the blocking criteria are resolved.
Pivot
Pro level
Published-method rule: Use the proper base pivot or handle high after CANSLIM leadership and market-direction checks are satisfied.
Evidence: Canonical setup geometry is available with Pro.
Entry trigger
Pro level
Published-method rule: Require a breakout through the pivot on volume at least 40% above average; the valid buy zone ends 5% above the pivot.
Evidence: Canonical setup geometry is available with Pro.
Initial stop
Pro level
Published-method rule: Use the setup's structural stop with a hard 7–8% maximum-loss ceiling from the actual entry.
Evidence: Canonical setup geometry is available with Pro.
Trail
Rule-based
Published-method rule: Protect progress under constructive support such as the 21-day or 10-week line; a stop may ratchet higher but never lower.
Evidence: Planned management rule; no stored stop or broker order is changed automatically.
Exit / invalidation
Pro level
Published-method rule: Exit on the hard loss limit, a decisive support break, or a rule-based climax/distribution signal; a normal 20–25% advance is reviewed rather than assumed permanent.
Evidence: Canonical setup geometry is available with Pro.
Deterministic educational plan, not a recommendation. No order or stop is changed automatically. Method and sources →

Forming Patterns (predictive — not confirmed)

Head & Shoulders bearish forming
75% built

Possible head & shoulders top — not confirmed. Watch for a daily close below ~88.75 (neckline) to confirm, with measured-move risk toward ~42.21. A push back above 128.09 weakens the pattern; reclaiming 135.29 invalidates it.

Confirms below 88.75
Invalidates at 135.29
Left Shoulder 121.26
Head 135.29
Right Shoulder 128.09
Neckline 88.75
Target 42.21

LS 121.26 / head 135.29 / RS 128.09, neckline ~88.75, vol_fading=yes

Predictive pattern recognition is educational — most forming structures never confirm. Wait for the confirmation level before treating this as a setup.

Pattern Analysis (historical)

Cup & Handle Historical replay: +20% before −8% within 40 sessions: 16% (n=376) · source bars 2024-11-01–2026-10-26 · avg +0.3% per setup (+0.03R) ⚠ Late-stage base (#4) ⚠ Head & shoulders top (neckline confirmed) ⚠ Not actionable yet
50 setup score
RS Score 82
Trend template 5/8
CANSLIM 71.0* (B)
29.4% cup depth 7.7% handle
  • Cup 29.4% deep from a $129.18 left rim to a $91.18 low
  • Rims 4.7% apart (ideal, within 10%)
  • Handle pulled back 7.7% over 3 bars from $124.25 to $114.63
  • Handle sits in the upper half of the cup
  • Rounded U-shaped bottom
  • Pivot $135.29 fixed at the handle high
  • No close above the pivot yet
  • Volume dried up in the handle
Raw detector evidence · confidence is a heuristic match score, not a probability depth=29.4%, handle_pb=7.7%, lips_diff=4.7%, upper_half=yes, u_shape=yes, near_pivot=no, orderly=yes | Strong trend (7/8) | Top RS (82) | High-confidence pattern (90%) | Stage 2 | Readiness 63/100 (early) | CANSLIM 71.0 (B) | ⚠ Late-stage base (#4); Head & shoulders top (neckline confirmed); Not actionable yet setup_key=cup_handle|2026-07-08|2026-08-25|135.29 · cup_handle/2026-09-16 anchors={"bottom": {"bar": 151, "bars_ago": 58, "date": "2026-07-08", "price": 91.18}, "breakout": null, "handle_high": {"bar": 205, "bars_ago": 4, "date": "2026-09-23", "price": 124.25}, "handle_low": {"bar": 208, "bars_ago": 1, "date": "2026-09-28", "price": 114.63}, "left_lip": {"bar": 39, "bars_ago": 170, "date": "2026-01-26", "price": 129.184}, "right_lip": {"bar": 185, "bars_ago": 24, "date": "2026-08-25", "price": 135.29}}
Why This Setup? D+W Confluence
cup handle Cup & Handle · schematic

depth=29.4%, handle_pb=7.7%, lips_diff=4.7%, upper_half=yes, u_shape=yes, near_pivot=no, orderly=yes | Strong trend (7/8) | Top RS (82) | High-confidence pattern (90%) | Stage 2 | Readiness 63/100 (early) | CANSLIM 71.0 (B) | ⚠ Late-stage base (#4); Head & shoulders top (neckline confirmed); Not actionable yet

The Universal Edge Check · context only

What the setup still has going for it, recorded for later. The verdict above stands — these principles do not overrule it.

3/7 universals met
  • Clear of earnings — not met in -5 days — event risk
  • A relative-strength leader — partly met RS rank 63 — middling
  • In a confirmed uptrend — partly met Stage 1 · Trend template 5/8 — not yet Stage 2
  • Volume confirms — partly met 0.6× average — light
  • Asymmetric reward — met Met — levels are a Pro detail
  • Not chasing (in range) — met Met — levels are a Pro detail
  • Risk is defined — met Met — levels are a Pro detail
Why these seven? → The Universal Edge

Minervini Trend Template

5/8

Grades the price structure — moving-average stacking, distance from the 52-week high/low, and relative strength above the ≥70 uptrend bar. This is the technical trend check; the company's fundamentals and ≥80 RS leadership are scored separately in the Grade Card.

Price above SMA 150 & 200 $110.39 vs SMA150 $110.70 / SMA200 $112.47
SMA 150 above SMA 200 SMA150 $110.70 vs SMA200 $112.47
SMA 200 trending up Slope +1.33 over 20 days
SMA 50 above SMA 150 & 200 SMA50 $121.52
Price above SMA 50 $110.39 vs SMA50 $121.52
30%+ above 52-week low +45.2% from $76.05
Within 25% of 52-week high -18.4% from $135.29
RS score above 70 RS 82

Fundamentals

52W Range
58%
Mkt Cap SEC
114.7B
EPS QoQ
+15%
Rev YoY
+21%
ROE
25%
Gross Margin
68%
D/E
0.17
EPS TTM
$6.39
P/E TTM
17.3x
Float
1.0B
Insider
No Buy

Company

Company profile
Newmont Corporation
NEM · NYSE · Non-Energy Minerals · Precious Metals
O'Neil · Grade Card
CANSLIM — current EPS, annual EPS, new highs, supply, leader RS, inst. sponsorship, market
B 71.0* CANSLIM * disqualified on C, M
C · Curr. EPS
78
A · Annual EPS
86
N · New Highs
40
S · Supply/Demand
80
L · Leader RS
82
I · Inst. Spons.
96
M · Market
30

Weekly Context

Multi-timeframe signals from weekly bars
W. Trend
7/8
W. RS
79
W. Support
$88.75
W. Resist
$135.29
W. Patterns
Golden Cross
Weekly Structure

Scan History

Sep 25: 50 (Cup & Handle)Sep 28: 80 (Trend Only)Sep 30: 50 (Wyckoff SOS)Sep 29: 50 (Wyckoff SOS)Sep 30: 50 (Cup & Handle)50
Sep 30
Cup & Handle ✓ Gate
50
Sep 29
Wyckoff SOS ✓ Gate
50 -5.7%
Sep 30
Wyckoff SOS ✓ Gate
50 -4.3%
Sep 28
Trend Only ✓ Gate
80 -4.9%
Sep 25
Cup & Handle ✓ Gate
50 -9.1%

Latest News

Headlines for NEM
Loading headlines…

Get the full picture on NEM

Pro members see entry/stop/target levels, R:R ratios, intraday alerts, and every setup detected across 500+ symbols daily.

Start 7-Day Free Trial