Stand aside — setup invalidated
Setup score 55, but price closes below stop $80.94 — stand aside until the condition resets.
Simple research view
OMC · Omnicom Group Inc.
$78.73 -1.38% Oct 27 close
Switch to Advanced for indicator panels, raw grades, provenance, drawing tools, and full technical tables.
$OMC
Omnicom Group Inc.Omnicom Group Inc. is a large-cap Advertising/Marketing Services company in the Commercial Services sector with a market cap of $21B.
Market Structure
Trend structure: range
Latest event: structure_shift
(bullish)
Support
76.29–77.16
· 11 touches · strong
Support
77.64–78.20
· 6 touches · strong
Support
73.17–73.63
· 6 touches · strong
Support
69.86–70.29
· 3 touches · moderate
Support
71.11–71.52
· 3 touches · moderate
Historical verdict · setup score 55/100 · data Oct 27 close · 1 session old
Stand aside — setup invalidated
Setup score 55, but price closes below stop $80.94 — stand aside until the condition resets.
Recent price action · daily
What would change this verdict
What needs to turn for this to become buyable — the top failing checks across the legend council:
- Minervini 1.5 Price > 50-day MA — Price $78.73 vs MA50 $80.26
- Minervini 1.8 RS rank ≥ 70 (prefer ≥ 85) — RS rank 40
- O'Neil C: Quarterly EPS acceleration ≥ 25% — CANSLIM grade C
- O'Neil L: RS rank ≥ 80 (IBD leadership) — RS rank 40
- Weinstein Stage 2 (Advancing phase) confirmed — Stage 3 (Topping)
- Weinstein Volume expansion above average — Volume ratio 1.08x
Minority view — the council disagrees here
- Minervini: avoid Trend-template read: fails Price > 50-day MA.
- O'Neil: avoid CANSLIM read: fails C: Quarterly EPS acceleration ≥ 25%.
- Weinstein: avoid Stage-analysis read: topping (Stage 3) is not an advancing Stage 2.
50
Neutral
Legend Score · rates the stock
Neutral (50/100) — held back by quality (smr-like)
Our proprietary 0-100 rating — the answer to Wall Street's black-box scores. Five pillars, each computed from real scan data, each explained below in plain English.
- Relative Strength (25%) 40
- Trend Template (25%) 62
- Institutional Footprint (20%) 65
- EPS Growth (15%) 50
- Quality (SMR-like) (15%) 30
RS rank 40: middle of the pack — no leadership yet. Trend template 5/8: mixed — some uptrend elements, some missing. Institutional score 65: mild accumulation. No recent earnings growth data — scored neutral. Quality 30: weak fundamentals (sales growth 30). Updated 2026-10-26.
Earnings
Normal technical setup
Next earnings
Thursday, October 22, 2026
After market close
Exact clock time not supplied by source
Deterministic evidence
Reported EPS 2.73 vs estimate 2.6567 · surprise +2.8%
OMC-1.38%
Sector proxy · XLI+0.57%
Broad market · SPY+0.56%
⚠ Expectations warningPositive catalyst, negative tape: EPS beat estimates by 2.8%, while price fell 1.4%. Treat the mismatch as expectations/distribution evidence, not as a bullish confirmation.
Session internals Mixed
Rule: direction and internals disagree — it met neither the strong nor the weak rule. Judged on internals, not on the size of the move.
Vs prior close-1.38%
From the open-0.93%
Range position52%
GapNo gap
QQQ confirmationDiverging (+1.27%)
SMH confirmationDiverging (+3.02%)
Short-term conviction -2 points.
Price bars, sourced event fields, and benchmark math only. This can adjust displayed short-term conviction; it does not change the stored scanner score or readiness.
- Positive catalyst received negative stock confirmation.
- QQQ, SMH moved against the stock — no index confirmation.
Ask a Legend to interpret this evidence → Commentary only — never scanner evidence or a sizing recommendation.
More stats
52W Low
$66.33
Tight Wks
0
Base
B2
SMA 200
$78.20
RS Line vs High
-13.9%
RS Line Slope
+10.9% ▲
ADR%
2.5%
ATR(14)
$2.48 (3.1%)
Vol Pace (live)
N/A
A/D Days
9A / 12D
A/D Rating
E
VDU Bars
0/10 d
Earnings
past
OMC Chart
Interactive price, volume, RS, RSI, and MACD charts are available after sign in.
Technical Analysis Report Card
$OMC · $78.73 · as of 2026-10-27 · multi-factor read
59
/ 100
Reference read from price & volume only — the verdict at the top of the page decides the action.
Trend · Daily / Weekly / Monthly
Daily
▬ Sideways / consolidating
Weekly
▼ Weak / rolling over
Monthly
▬ Sideways / consolidating
Moving Averages
50-day$80.26 ↓
100-day$79.82 ↓
200-day$78.20 ↑
Bullish (50 > 200)
RSI (14)
Reading48.8 · Neutral
Neutral — momentum is balanced between buyers and sellers.
MACD (12/26/9)
StateBullish
Histogram+0.392
Bullish — MACD above its signal line and above zero. Histogram contracting.
Bollinger Bands (20,2)
%B / Width56% · 14.6%
Mid-band — no directional band edge in play.
Volume · Buyer vs Seller
Up/Down vol1.12 · Neutral
Rel volume1.08×
Pocket pivots · 10d2
5d vs 50d vol141%
Heavy vol up / down2 / 0
Balanced — up/down volume is roughly even; no clear hand. Recent volume is expanding versus its baseline.
- Pocket pivot 3 sessions ago — up-day volume beat every down day of the prior 10 sessions.
- 2 heavy-volume up days vs 0 down in the last 20 sessions.
Support & Resistance
R · $80.06swing level
R · $85.18swing level
R · $87.41swing level
Price · $78.73now
S · $76.75swing level
S · $73.55swing level
S · $70.14swing level
Fibonacci · Uptrend swing
23.6%$84.95
38.2%$82.09
50.0% ◄ price here$79.78
61.8%$77.46
78.6%$74.17
Retracement support zones measured from the recent swing low up to the high.
The verdict is free. The trade plan is Pro.
Unlock the exact entry, stop-loss, profit target, and reward-to-risk for OMC — plus the full 500+ symbol scanner and Ask-the-Legends chat.
Start your 7-day free trial →
Weekly downtrendAbove 200-day MA50/200 bullish
Want this read in a legend's voice?
Ask a Legend about OMC
Generic technical analysis generated mechanically from price & volume — educational research only, not financial advice or a personalized recommendation. Levels are illustrative; confirm on your own chart. New to these terms? →
Legend Verdicts
6 methodology checks
Who would consider this setup, why it qualifies, and what blocks it — calculated from the same deterministic methodology rules used across Legend AI.
How to read the numbers: the setup score (55/100, in the verdict band) rates this trade setup. Each legend's A–D grade rates the same setup against that legend's own checklist — so a high score next to a C grade is not a contradiction. The setup can be strong without fitting that legend's style. When the council disagrees, the verdict band breaks the tie.
Council consensus:
5 of 9 legends are Watching — building, not yet a confirmed buy.
Minervini
Avoid
D
Trend-template read: fails Price > 50-day MA.
Passing evidence
1.1 Price > 150-day MA AND 200-day MAPrice $78.73, MA150 $78.39, MA200 $78.20
1.2 150-day MA > 200-day MAMA150 $78.39 vs MA200 $78.20
Failing evidence
1.5 Price > 50-day MAPrice $78.73 vs MA50 $80.26
1.8 RS rank ≥ 70 (prefer ≥ 85)RS rank 40
O'Neil
Avoid
D
CANSLIM read: fails C: Quarterly EPS acceleration ≥ 25%.
Passing evidence
N: Near 52-week high or RS line new high12.1% below high | RS line new high: False
S: Base tightness (ATR% ≤ 4.5%)ATR% 3.15%
Failing evidence
C: Quarterly EPS acceleration ≥ 25%CANSLIM grade C
L: RS rank ≥ 80 (IBD leadership)RS rank 40
Weinstein
Avoid
D
Stage-analysis read: topping (Stage 3) is not an advancing Stage 2.
Passing evidence
Price above 30-week MA (200-day proxy)Price $78.73 vs MA200 $78.20
30-week MA trending upwardFrom weekly scan context
Failing evidence
Stage 2 (Advancing phase) confirmedStage 3 (Topping)
Volume expansion above averageVolume ratio 1.08x
dennis
Watch
C
Turtle read: no Donchian signal. The system stays flat until price takes out the 20-day high.
Passing evidence
No breakdown below the 20-day channel20-day low $73.63
Volatility-unit sizing (1N ≈ 1% of equity)1N = $2.36 (3.00% of price); the Turtles size 1 unit so a 1N move ≈ 1% of equity, making the 2N stop ≈ 2% equity risk
Failing evidence
S1: 20-day Donchian breakoutNot confirmed
S2: 55-day Donchian breakoutNot confirmed
zanger
Avoid
C
Zanger read: a hard gate is broken — either the pattern is not one of his six, or the entry is more than 5% past the breakout. He would not touch this.
Passing evidence
Not extended (≤5% above the breakout point)Measured as passing
Partial-profit plan: sell 20-30% at +15-20%Scale 20-30% at $90.54-$94.48; trail the rest
Failing evidence
Named Zanger pattern onlyRecord Volume is not one of Zanger's six
Breakout volume 1.5-2.0x averageNot confirmed
zweig
Watch
D
Zweig read: part of his screen passes but not all: Insider buying; Price strength (RS ≥ 70) — wait for the full growth screen before treating this as a Zweig setup.
Passing evidence
Breadth momentum: 10-day A/D ratio10-day A/D 1.16 (2126 adv / 1826 dec) — participation expanding
4% Model (breadth proxy)62% of universe above 50-day — broad strength (adapted from Ned Davis 4% Model)
Failing evidence
Insider buyingNo insider buying flagged
Price strength (RS ≥ 70)RS score 40 — Zweig buys strength, not bargains
Livermore
Watch
B
Pivotal-point read: constructive evidence is present, but relative strength is unresolved.
Passing evidence
Price$78.73
Distance from 52-week high12.1% below high
Failing evidence
Relative strengthRS 40
Volume vs average1.08x
Darvas
Watch
B
Box-theory read: constructive evidence is present, but relative strength is unresolved.
Passing evidence
Price$78.73
Distance from 52-week high12.1% below high
Failing evidence
Relative strengthRS 40
Volume vs average1.08x
Wyckoff
Watch
B
Supply-and-demand read: constructive evidence is present, but relative strength is unresolved.
mediumSign of Strength — breakout above trading range on expanding volume. Accumulation phase complete, markup beginning. RS 40.
Passing evidence
Price$78.73
Distance from 52-week high12.1% below high
Failing evidence
Relative strengthRS 40
Volume vs average1.08x
Base & Breakout
Breakout follow-through
No active breakout tracked — Legend AI monitors daily for pivot-point breaks. What's a breakout?
RS Line vs SPY
52-week relative strength · blue = RS line · dashed = MA50 · dot = NH
▲ Rising
Accumulation / Distribution
last 65 sessions · green = acc on high vol · red = dist on high vol
Net +6
Fundamentals & leadership quality — Minervini’s published criteria · 1/7 met
D
1/7 criteria
Separate score from the Minervini Trend Template (4/8): the Trend Template grades the price structure, this grades the company & leadership (earnings, sales, margins, RS rank). A stock can ride a clean trend while its fundamentals lag, so the two often differ by design — they are not the same checklist.
EPS acceleration ≥25% QoQ
—
Revenue growth ≥20% YoY
+10%
Gross margin ≥30%
—
ROE ≥17%
—
RS rating ≥80 (leadership)
40
Stage 2 uptrend (Weinstein)
Stage 3
Within 25% of 52W high
-12.1%
Method Playbook
Trade it like Darvas
EXACT LEVELS · PRO
Darvas B · Watch — The deterministic methodology check is Watch; wait for the failing or incomplete criteria to improve before the trigger can qualify.
Pivot
Pro levelPublished-method rule: Use the top of the active Darvas box near the high as the mechanical breakout boundary.
Evidence: Canonical setup geometry is available with Pro.
Evidence: Canonical setup geometry is available with Pro.
Entry trigger
Pro levelPublished-method rule: Require price to clear the box top with volume confirmation; movement inside the box remains observation, not a trigger.
Evidence: Canonical setup geometry is available with Pro.
Evidence: Canonical setup geometry is available with Pro.
Initial stop
Pro levelPublished-method rule: Start below the active box support or the canonical structural stop that proves the breakout failed.
Evidence: Canonical setup geometry is available with Pro.
Evidence: Canonical setup geometry is available with Pro.
Trail
Rule-basedPublished-method rule: As higher boxes form, raise the stop beneath the newest confirmed box floor; the stop moves up only.
Evidence: Planned management rule; no stored stop or broker order is changed automatically.
Evidence: Planned management rule; no stored stop or broker order is changed automatically.
Exit / invalidation
Pro levelPublished-method rule: Exit when price breaks the active box floor or decisively falls back through the breakout structure.
Evidence: Canonical setup geometry is available with Pro.
Evidence: Canonical setup geometry is available with Pro.
Deterministic educational plan, not a recommendation. No order or stop is changed automatically. Method and sources →
The published-method workflow is public. Unlock exact pivot, entry, stop, target, and sizing with Pro →
Pattern Analysis (historical)
Record Volume
⚠ Not actionable yet
55
setup score
RS Score
40
Trend template
4/8
CANSLIM
62.3* (C)
cadence: daily
lookback bars: 260
detector version: record_volume/2026-09-27
record bar ago: 0
record volume: 5295171
volume multiple: 2.0
volume ratio: 2.005
rare tier: ✗
bars since bigger: 25
since date: 2026-09-18
callout text: Highest daily volume since 2026-09-18
up day: ✓
absorbed: ✓
low held: ✓
day gain pct: 0.78
depth pct: 0.78
day range pct: 6.02
geometry: {'record_bar': {'bar': 259, 'bars_ago': 0, 'price': 82.68, 'date': '2026-10-23'}, 'record_volume': 5295171, 'callout_text': 'Highest daily volume since 2026-09-18', 'arrow_target': {'bar': 259, 'bars_ago': 0, 'price': 82.68, 'date': '2026-10-23'}}
confidence kind: heuristic_match
findings: ['Highest daily volume since 2026-09-18: 5,295,171 shares (2.0x the trailing average)', 'Price action constructive — closed up on the day (record bar $82.04 -> $82.68, now $82.68)']
validation reason: valid generic setup
multi tf evaluated: ✓
multi tf reason: weekly: MA stabilizing or rising — accumulation context supported
Why This Setup?
D+W Confluence
Record Volume · schematic
Highest daily volume since 2026-09-18 — 5,295,171 shares (2.0x average), 0 bars ago, and price action is constructive (closed up on the day). Big volume with holding prices means institutions are involved. Research/educational only, not a buy/sell recommendation. | Moderate trend (5/8) | High-confidence pattern (74%) | Volume surging | Readiness 52/100 (early) | CANSLIM 62.3 (C) | ⚠ Not actionable yet
The Universal Edge Check · context only
What the setup still has going for it, recorded for later. The verdict above stands — these principles do not overrule it.
4/7
universals met
- A relative-strength leader — not met RS rank 5 — laggard
- Clear of earnings — not met in -6 days — event risk
- In a confirmed uptrend — partly met Stage 3 · Trend template 4/8 — not yet Stage 2
- Asymmetric reward — met Met — levels are a Pro detail
- Not chasing (in range) — met Met — levels are a Pro detail
- Risk is defined — met Met — levels are a Pro detail
- Volume confirms — met 2.0× average
Minervini Trend Template
4/8Grades the price structure — moving-average stacking, distance from the 52-week high/low, and relative strength above the ≥70 uptrend bar. This is the technical trend check; the company's fundamentals and ≥80 RS leadership are scored separately in the Grade Card.
Price above SMA 150 & 200
$78.73 vs SMA150 $78.39 / SMA200 $78.20
SMA 150 above SMA 200
SMA150 $78.39 vs SMA200 $78.20
SMA 200 trending up
Slope -0.20 over 20 days
SMA 50 above SMA 150 & 200
SMA50 $80.26
Price above SMA 50
$78.73 vs SMA50 $80.26
30%+ above 52-week low
+18.7% from $66.33
Within 25% of 52-week high
-12.1% from $89.57
RS score above 70
RS 40
Fundamentals
52W Range
53%
Mkt Cap SEC
21.5B
Rev YoY
+10%
EPS TTM
$-0.27
Float
273M
Insider
No Buy
Company
Company profile
Omnicom Group Inc.
CANSLIM — current EPS, annual EPS, new highs, supply, leader RS, inst. sponsorship, market
C
62.3* CANSLIM
* disqualified on C, M
C · Curr. EPS
40
A · Annual EPS
67
N · New Highs
100
S · Supply/Demand
100
L · Leader RS
40
I · Inst. Spons.
100
M · Market
30
Weekly Context
Multi-timeframe signals from weekly barsW. Trend
5/8
W. RS
60
W. Support
$69.98
W. Resist
$89.57
W. Patterns
Cup & Handle
Basing
Weekly Structure
Trend
Neutral
Tight Weeks
0
Confirmation
Neutral
Scan History
Oct 26
Record Volume
55
Oct 23
watchlist_candidate
0
-4.8%
Oct 22
watchlist_candidate
0
-4.6%
Oct 21
watchlist_candidate
0
-2.2%
Latest News
Headlines for OMCLoading headlines…
Get the full picture on OMC
Pro members see entry/stop/target levels, R:R ratios, intraday alerts, and every setup detected across 500+ symbols daily.
Start 7-Day Free Trial