Switch to Advanced for indicator panels, raw grades, provenance, drawing tools, and full technical tables.
$SMH
etfStage 1 · BasingBase 2
$541.62latest close
⚠ Risk Signals
Head & Shoulders TopNeckline ~554.66 has broken. Measured-move risk extends toward ~437.49; a fast reclaim of 554.66 would be a failed breakdown (often bullish).
Bearish structure on the daily chart — a heads-up for anyone holding, not a short signal. Does not affect the bullish setup score.
Triggers when price crosses your target during market hours or after the next daily scan. Delivered via email and Telegram (if linked in Account).
Historical record
No active setup in the latest scan — this page shows the last detection Legend AI made for $SMH.
Every level, score and criterion below is computed from the Oct 26 close session (latest session), and may no longer hold.
Historical verdict · setup score 85/100 · data Oct 26 close · latest session
Stand aside — setup invalidated
Setup score 85, but distribution days reach 5 or more — stand aside until the condition resets.
What needs to turn for this to become buyable — the top failing checks across the legend council:
Minervini1.1 Price > 150-day MA AND 200-day MA — Price $541.62, MA150 $554.84, MA200 $516.25
Minervini1.5 Price > 50-day MA — Price $541.62 vs MA50 $574.17
O'NeilN: Near 52-week high or RS line new high — 19.4% below high | RS line new high: False
O'NeilM: Market in confirmed uptrend — Market phase: uptrend_under_pressure
WeinsteinVolume expansion above average — Volume ratio 1.36x
DennisS1: 20-day Donchian breakout
Minority view — the council disagrees here
Minervini: avoidTrend-template read: fails Price > 150-day MA AND 200-day MA.
O'Neil: watchCANSLIM read: 2/6 pass; improvement is still needed.
Weinstein: watchStage-analysis read: Stage 2 is present; 1 supporting checks need improvement.
75Strong
Legend Score · rates the stockStrong (75/100) — held back by institutional footprint
Our proprietary 0-100 rating — the answer to Wall Street's black-box scores. Five pillars, each computed from real scan data, each explained below in plain English.
Relative Strength (25%)90
Trend Template (25%)100
Institutional Footprint (20%)64
EPS Growth (15%)50
Quality (SMR-like) (15%)50
RS rank 89: beating most of the market. Trend template 8/8: price above rising 50/150/200-day lines — textbook uptrend structure. Institutional score 64: mild accumulation. No recent earnings growth data — scored neutral. No sales/ROE data — scored neutral.
Updated 2026-10-14.
Price$541.62 +2.7%Oct 26 close
52W High$671.8312.5% below high
Wks Since High15w17w today
Base Depth24.6%25.0% today
RS Rank76percentile of scan
SMA 50$574.17
Avg Vol7,475,736
Rel Vol (Oct 26)1.36×0.72× on up days
More stats
52W Low$315.05
Tight Wks0
BaseB2
SMA 200$516.25
RS Line vs High-15.9%
RS Line Slope+4.5% ▲
ADR%2.2%
ATR(14)$19.10 (3.5%)
Vol Pace (live)N/A
A/D Days10A / 15D
A/D RatingE
VDU Bars0/10 d
Position in 52-week range64thpercentile of the 52-week range
$315.05low
$671.83high
SMH Chart
Interactive price, volume, RS, RSI, and MACD charts are available after sign in.
Create a free account to load the full interactive chart for SMH.
Generic technical analysis generated mechanically from price & volume — educational research only, not financial advice or a personalized recommendation. Levels are illustrative; confirm on your own chart. New to these terms? →
Legend Verdicts6 methodology checks
Who would consider this setup, why it qualifies, and what blocks it — calculated from the same deterministic methodology rules used across Legend AI. How to read the numbers: the setup score (85/100, in the verdict band) rates this trade setup. Each legend's A–D grade rates the same setup against that legend's own checklist — so a high score next to a C grade is not a contradiction. The setup can be strong without fitting that legend's style. When the council disagrees, the verdict band breaks the tie.
Council consensus:
7 of 9 legends are Watching — building, not yet a confirmed buy.
MinerviniAvoidCTrend-template read: fails Price > 150-day MA AND 200-day MA.
Passing evidence
✓1.2 150-day MA > 200-day MAMA150 $554.84 vs MA200 $516.25
✓1.4 50-day MA > 150-day MA AND 200-day MAMA50 $574.17, MA150 $554.84, MA200 $516.25
Failing evidence
✕1.1 Price > 150-day MA AND 200-day MAPrice $541.62, MA150 $554.84, MA200 $516.25
✕1.5 Price > 50-day MAPrice $541.62 vs MA50 $574.17
Not applicable
–2. Quarterly EPS growth ≥ 25%No single-company earnings — not applicable to ETFs
–2. ROE ≥ 17%No single-company earnings — not applicable to ETFs
–2. Revenue growth ≥ 20% YoYNo single-company earnings — not applicable to ETFs
WeinsteinWatchBStage-analysis read: Stage 2 is present; 1 supporting checks need improvement.
mediumClassic Stage 2 advancing phase — strong weekly trend confirms uptrend. This is Weinstein's sweet spot: buy and hold while price remains above the 30-week MA.
dennisWatchBTurtle read: no Donchian signal. The system stays flat until price takes out the 20-day high.
Passing evidence
✓No breakdown below the 20-day channel20-day low $520.53
✓Volatility-unit sizing (1N ≈ 1% of equity)1N = $17.41 (3.21% of price); the Turtles size 1 unit so a 1N move ≈ 1% of equity, making the 2N stop ≈ 2% equity risk
zangerAvoidDZanger read: a hard gate is broken — either the pattern is not one of his six, or the entry is more than 5% past the breakout. He would not touch this.
Passing evidence
✓Partial-profit plan: sell 20-30% at +15-20%Scale 20-30% at $622.86-$649.94; trail the rest
✓Trail on the 10/20-day MA10-day MA $549.52 · 20-day MA $582.63 — exit the remainder on a close below the trail
Failing evidence
✕Named Zanger pattern onlyTrend Only is not one of Zanger's six
zweigWatchAZweig read: passes his full growth screen — earnings growing faster than the market, a price that is reasonable for that growth, insiders buying, and price strength. Super Model timing — timing tailwinds: Breadth momentum, 4% Model (breadth proxy); 2 timing leg(s) lack data.
Fundamentals & leadership quality — Minervini’s published criteria · 2/3 met · earnings criteria N/A for ETFs
A
2/3 criteria
Separate score from the Minervini Trend Template (6/8): the Trend Template grades the price structure, this grades the company & leadership (earnings, sales, margins, RS rank). A stock can ride a clean trend while its fundamentals lag, so the two often differ by design — they are not the same checklist.
Weinstein B · Watch — The deterministic methodology check is Watch; wait for the failing or incomplete criteria to improve before the trigger can qualify.
Pivot
Pro level
Published-method rule: Use Stage 1 resistance and the rising 30-week moving average as the Stage 2 transition boundary. Evidence: Canonical setup geometry is available with Pro.
Entry trigger
Pro level
Published-method rule: Require a Stage 2 breakout above resistance on expanding volume; avoid entries while the 30-week average is flat or falling. Evidence: Canonical setup geometry is available with Pro.
Initial stop
Pro level
Published-method rule: Start below the breakout structure or Stage 1 support where a return to the base invalidates the Stage 2 transition. Evidence: Canonical setup geometry is available with Pro.
Trail
Rule-based
Published-method rule: Trail beneath rising 30-week support or later higher swing lows while Stage 2 remains intact. Evidence: Planned management rule; no stored stop or broker order is changed automatically.
Exit / invalidation
Pro level
Published-method rule: Exit on a decisive 30-week support failure or a Stage 3/Stage 4 transition; never treat a failed Stage 2 break as healthy consolidation. Evidence: Canonical setup geometry is available with Pro.
Deterministic educational plan, not a recommendation. No order or stop is changed automatically. Method and sources →
Grades the price structure — moving-average stacking, distance from the 52-week high/low, and relative strength above the ≥70 uptrend bar. This is the technical trend check; the company's fundamentals and ≥80 RS leadership are scored separately in the Grade Card.
✗
Price above SMA 150 & 200$541.62 vs SMA150 $554.84 / SMA200 $516.25
✓
SMA 150 above SMA 200SMA150 $554.84 vs SMA200 $516.25