Switch to Advanced for indicator panels, raw grades, provenance, drawing tools, and full technical tables.
$TER
Teradyne, Inc.
Teradyne, Inc. is
a large-cap
Electronic Production Equipment company in the Electronic Technology sector with a market cap of
$48B.
Electronic TechnologyElectronic Production EquipmentstockStage 1 · BasingBase 1
$309.00latest close
Market Structure
Trend structure:range
Latest event:structure_shift(bearish)
Resistance
326.00–328.28
· 5 touches · strong
Support
300.40–301.86
· 3 touches · moderate
Momentum Turn Watch
Bollinger Lower-Band SupportPrice ($309.00) is holding just above the lower Bollinger band ($282.80; %B 14) — support at the bottom of the bands.
Early technical context only. Wait for price, volume, and the canonical setup trigger to confirm; this signal does not change readiness or the setup score.
Triggers when price crosses your target during market hours or after the next daily scan. Delivered via email and Telegram (if linked in Account).
Historical record
No active setup in the latest scan — this page shows the last detection Legend AI made for $TER.
Every level, score and criterion below is computed from the Oct 26 close session (latest session), and may no longer hold.
Historical verdict · setup score 83/100 · data Oct 26 close · latest session
Stand aside — setup invalidated
Setup score 83, but distribution days reach 5 or more — stand aside until the condition resets.
What needs to turn for this to become buyable — the top failing checks across the legend council:
Minervini1.1 Price > 150-day MA AND 200-day MA — Price $309.00, MA150 $369.95, MA200 $347.99
Minervini1.5 Price > 50-day MA — Price $309.00 vs MA50 $372.26
O'NeilN: Near 52-week high or RS line new high — 36.7% below high | RS line new high: False
O'NeilS: Base tightness (ATR% ≤ 4.5%) — ATR% 7.02%
WeinsteinPrice above 30-week MA (200-day proxy) — Price $309.00 vs MA200 $347.99
WeinsteinVolume expansion above average — Volume ratio 1.15x
Minority view — the council disagrees here
Minervini: avoidTrend-template read: fails Price > 150-day MA AND 200-day MA.
O'Neil: watchCANSLIM read: 3/8 pass; improvement is still needed.
Weinstein: watchStage-analysis read: Stage 2 is present; 3 supporting checks need improvement.
73Strong
Legend Score · rates the stockStrong (73/100) — held back by eps growth
Our proprietary 0-100 rating — the answer to Wall Street's black-box scores. Five pillars, each computed from real scan data, each explained below in plain English.
Relative Strength (25%)95
Trend Template (25%)100
Institutional Footprint (20%)65
EPS Growth (15%)31
Quality (SMR-like) (15%)44
RS rank 94: top 6% of all stocks — true leadership. Trend template 8/8: price above rising 50/150/200-day lines — textbook uptrend structure. Institutional score 65: mild accumulation. EPS up +0% — growing, but below the 25% leadership bar. Quality 44: weak fundamentals (sales growth 30, return on equity 41, leverage 100).
Updated 2026-10-13.
Earnings
Post-earnings setup
Next earnings
Monday, October 26, 2026After market close
Exact clock time not supplied by source
Deterministic evidence
TER+0.05%
Sector proxy · XLK+1.69%
Broad market · SPY+0.71%
Same completed session window ending 2026-10-26.
TER was -1.64 points vs XLK.
-0.66 points vs SPY.
⚠ Green but fading. The day closed below its open and in the lower third of the range. This is not strong momentum, whatever the headline percentage says.
Short-term conviction -1 points.
Session closed below its open and in the lower third of the day's range — green on the day, but the move faded.
Price bars, sourced event fields, and benchmark math only. This can adjust displayed short-term conviction; it does not change the stored scanner score or readiness.
Generic technical analysis generated mechanically from price & volume — educational research only, not financial advice or a personalized recommendation. Levels are illustrative; confirm on your own chart. New to these terms? →
Legend Verdicts6 methodology checks
Who would consider this setup, why it qualifies, and what blocks it — calculated from the same deterministic methodology rules used across Legend AI. How to read the numbers: the setup score (83/100, in the verdict band) rates this trade setup. Each legend's A–D grade rates the same setup against that legend's own checklist — so a high score next to a C grade is not a contradiction. The setup can be strong without fitting that legend's style. When the council disagrees, the verdict band breaks the tie.
Council consensus:
7 of 9 legends are Watching — building, not yet a confirmed buy.
MinerviniAvoidDTrend-template read: fails Price > 150-day MA AND 200-day MA.
partialRule check says AVOID (6/11 checks passed) — Trend-template read: fails Price > 150-day MA AND 200-day MA.
Passing evidence
✓1.2 150-day MA > 200-day MAMA150 $369.95 vs MA200 $347.99
✓1.4 50-day MA > 150-day MA AND 200-day MAMA50 $372.26, MA150 $369.95, MA200 $347.99
Failing evidence
✕1.1 Price > 150-day MA AND 200-day MAPrice $309.00, MA150 $369.95, MA200 $347.99
✕1.5 Price > 50-day MAPrice $309.00 vs MA50 $372.26
WeinsteinWatchCStage-analysis read: Stage 2 is present; 3 supporting checks need improvement.
mediumClassic Stage 2 advancing phase — strong weekly trend confirms uptrend. This is Weinstein's sweet spot: buy and hold while price remains above the 30-week MA.
dennisWatchCTurtle read: no Donchian signal. The system stays flat until price takes out the 20-day high.
Passing evidence
✓No breakdown below the 20-day channel20-day low $304.27
✓Volatility-unit sizing (1N ≈ 1% of equity)1N = $21.29 (6.89% of price); the Turtles size 1 unit so a 1N move ≈ 1% of equity, making the 2N stop ≈ 2% equity risk
zangerAvoidDZanger read: a hard gate is broken — either the pattern is not one of his six, or the entry is more than 5% past the breakout. He would not touch this.
Passing evidence
✓Partial-profit plan: sell 20-30% at +15-20%Scale 20-30% at $355.35-$370.80; trail the rest
✓Trail on the 10/20-day MA10-day MA $335.22 · 20-day MA $374.64 — exit the remainder on a close below the trail
Failing evidence
✕Named Zanger pattern onlyTrend Only is not one of Zanger's six
zweigWatchDZweig read: part of his screen passes but not all: Reasonable price for the growth (P/E ≤ 35); Insider buying — wait for the full growth screen before treating this as a Zweig setup.
Passing evidence
✓EPS growth above the market (≥15% QoQ)+42.2% QoQ — Zweig wants growth above the S&P average
Fundamentals & leadership quality — Minervini’s published criteria · 4/7 met
B
4/7 criteria
Separate score from the Minervini Trend Template (5/8): the Trend Template grades the price structure, this grades the company & leadership (earnings, sales, margins, RS rank). A stock can ride a clean trend while its fundamentals lag, so the two often differ by design — they are not the same checklist.
Wyckoff B · Watch — The deterministic methodology check is Watch; wait for the failing or incomplete criteria to improve before the trigger can qualify.
Pivot
Pro level
Published-method rule: Use the Spring/test, Sign of Strength, creek, or Last Point of Support boundary identified by the active structure. Evidence: Canonical setup geometry is available with Pro.
Entry trigger
Pro level
Published-method rule: Require a completed test or Sign of Strength/Last Point of Support confirmation with improving demand versus supply. Evidence: Canonical setup geometry is available with Pro.
Initial stop
Pro level
Published-method rule: Start below the Spring/test low or structural support whose failure would invalidate the accumulation read. Evidence: Canonical setup geometry is available with Pro.
Trail
Rule-based
Published-method rule: Raise protection beneath successive Last Points of Support or meaningful higher lows during markup; never loosen it. Evidence: Planned management rule; no stored stop or broker order is changed automatically.
Exit / invalidation
Pro level
Published-method rule: Exit on a failed Sign of Strength, support loss, or clear supply-dominant reversal such as an upthrust failure. Evidence: Canonical setup geometry is available with Pro.
Deterministic educational plan, not a recommendation. No order or stop is changed automatically. Method and sources →
Possible head & shoulders top — not confirmed. Watch for a daily close below ~290.29 (neckline) to confirm, with measured-move risk toward ~92.67. A push back above 451.86 weakens the pattern; reclaiming 487.91 invalidates it.
Confirms below290.29
Invalidates at487.91
Left Shoulder422.11
Head487.91
Right Shoulder451.86
Neckline290.29
Target92.67
LS 422.11 / head 487.91 / RS 451.86, neckline ~290.29, vol_fading=yes
Predictive pattern recognition is educational — most forming structures never confirm. Wait for the confirmation level before treating this as a setup.
Grades the price structure — moving-average stacking, distance from the 52-week high/low, and relative strength above the ≥70 uptrend bar. This is the technical trend check; the company's fundamentals and ≥80 RS leadership are scored separately in the Grade Card.
✗
Price above SMA 150 & 200$309.00 vs SMA150 $369.95 / SMA200 $347.99
✓
SMA 150 above SMA 200SMA150 $369.95 vs SMA200 $347.99
✓
SMA 200 trending upSlope +17.29 over 20 days
✓
SMA 50 above SMA 150 & 200SMA50 $372.26
✗
Price above SMA 50$309.00 vs SMA50 $372.26
✓
30%+ above 52-week low+114.5% from $144.07
✗
Within 25% of 52-week high-36.7% from $487.91
✓
RS score above 70RS 94
Fundamentals
52W Range
48%
Mkt Cap SEC
48.3B
EPS QoQ
+42%
Rev YoY
+13%
ROE
30%
Gross Margin
59%
D/E
0.07
EPS TTM
$3.47
P/E TTM
89.0x
Float
156M
Insider
No Buy
Company
Company profile
Teradyne, Inc.
TER · NASDAQ
· Electronic Technology
· Electronic Production Equipment