Triggers when price crosses your target during market hours or after the next daily scan. Delivered via email and Telegram (if linked in Account).
Historical record
No newer session has been stored for $TOST.
Every level, score and criterion below is computed from the Nov 04 close session (1 session old), and may no longer hold.
Historical verdict · setup score 55/100 · data Nov 04 close · 1 session old
Stand aside — setup invalidated
Setup score 55, but distribution days reach 5 or more — stand aside until the condition resets.
Weinstein: watchStage-analysis read: Stage 2 is present; 1 supporting checks need improvement.
55Neutral
Legend Score · rates the stockNeutral (55/100) — held back by quality (smr-like)
Our proprietary 0-100 rating — the answer to Wall Street's black-box scores. Five pillars, each computed from real scan data, each explained below in plain English.
Relative Strength (25%)59
Trend Template (25%)75
Institutional Footprint (20%)47
EPS Growth (15%)50
Quality (SMR-like) (15%)30
RS rank 59: middle of the pack — no leadership yet. Trend template 6/8: passes the uptrend screen, structure intact. Institutional score 47: neutral — no clear institutional conviction. No recent earnings growth data — scored neutral. Quality 30: weak fundamentals (sales growth 30).
Updated 2026-11-05.
Earnings
Post-earnings setup
Next earnings
Tuesday, November 3, 2026After market close
Exact clock time not supplied by source
Deterministic evidence
Reported EPS 0.37
vs estimate 0.2564
· surprise +44.3%
TOST+5.49%
Sector proxy · XLK-0.01%
Broad market · SPY+1.65%
Same completed session window ending 2026-11-04.
TOST was +5.50 points vs XLK.
+3.84 points vs SPY.
Price bars, sourced event fields, and benchmark math only. This can adjust displayed short-term conviction; it does not change the stored scanner score or readiness.
Generic technical analysis generated mechanically from price & volume — educational research only, not financial advice or a personalized recommendation. Levels are illustrative; confirm on your own chart. New to these terms? →
Legend Verdicts6 methodology checks
Who would consider this setup, why it qualifies, and what blocks it — calculated from the same deterministic methodology rules used across Legend AI. How to read the numbers: the setup score (55/100, in the verdict band) rates this trade setup. Each legend's A–D grade rates the same setup against that legend's own checklist — so a high score next to a C grade is not a contradiction. The setup can be strong without fitting that legend's style. When the council disagrees, the verdict band breaks the tie.
Council consensus:
7 of 9 legends are Watching — building, not yet a confirmed buy.
MinerviniWatchBTrend-template read: 10/13 pass; wait for the soft misses to improve.
Passing evidence
✓1.1 Price > 150-day MA AND 200-day MAPrice $35.37, MA150 $29.62, MA200 $29.35
✓1.2 150-day MA > 200-day MAMA150 $29.62 vs MA200 $29.35
dennisWatchATurtle read: no breakout yet. Price is pressing the 20-day high. The system waits for the print; it never anticipates.
Passing evidence
✓No breakdown below the 20-day channel20-day low $28.93
✓Volatility-unit sizing (1N ≈ 1% of equity)1N = $1.33 (3.76% of price); the Turtles size 1 unit so a 1N move ≈ 1% of equity, making the 2N stop ≈ 2% equity risk
zangerAvoidBZanger read: a hard gate is broken — either the pattern is not one of his six, or the entry is more than 5% past the breakout. He would not touch this.
Passing evidence
✓Not extended (≤5% above the breakout point)Measured as passing
✓Partial-profit plan: sell 20-30% at +15-20%Scale 20-30% at $40.68-$42.44; trail the rest
Failing evidence
✕Named Zanger pattern onlyRecord Volume is not one of Zanger's six
zweigWatchDZweig read: part of his screen passes but not all: Reasonable price for the growth (P/E ≤ 35); Insider buying; Price strength (RS ≥ 70) — wait for the full growth screen before treating this as a Zweig setup.
Fundamentals & leadership quality — Minervini’s published criteria · 3/7 met
C
3/7 criteria
Separate score from the Minervini Trend Template (6/8): the Trend Template grades the price structure, this grades the company & leadership (earnings, sales, margins, RS rank). A stock can ride a clean trend while its fundamentals lag, so the two often differ by design — they are not the same checklist.
Zanger B · Avoid — The deterministic methodology check is Avoid; wait until the blocking criteria are resolved.
Pivot
Pro level
Published-method rule: Use the breakout point of a named pattern (flat base, bull flag, ascending triangle, cup and handle, double bottom, symmetrical triangle). Evidence: Canonical setup geometry is available with Pro.
Entry trigger
Pro level
Published-method rule: Buy the breakout day on 150-200% of average volume. Never pay more than 5% above the breakout point. Evidence: Canonical setup geometry is available with Pro.
Initial stop
Pro level
Published-method rule: Set the stop 2-3% below entry and sell on bad price action before it is even hit. Evidence: Canonical setup geometry is available with Pro.
Trail
Rule-based
Published-method rule: Sell 20-30% of the position at +15-20% from the breakout, then trail the rest on the 10/20-day moving average. Evidence: Planned management rule; no stored stop or broker order is changed automatically.
Exit / invalidation
Pro level
Published-method rule: Out on a break of the 10/20-day MA, a failed breakout back below the pivot, or a reversal pattern — winners are held, laggards are sold fast. Evidence: Canonical setup geometry is available with Pro.
Deterministic educational plan, not a recommendation. No order or stop is changed automatically. Method and sources →
Cup base building — 78% of the 23%-deep cup recovered. Watch for the right side to reach ~37.20, then a handle.
Pivot Watch4.92% away
Tightness / volumeExpanding · No VDU
Recent-pace band2–7 sessions
Confirms above37.20
Invalidates at32.95
Rim37.20
Cup Low28.69
Pivot37.20
Mid Cup32.95
Cup depth 23%, recovery 78%, handle=not yet
Head & Shouldersbearishforming
75%built
Possible head & shoulders top — not confirmed. Watch for a daily close below ~28.47 (neckline) to confirm, with measured-move risk toward ~19.74. A push back above 33.72 weakens the pattern; reclaiming 37.20 invalidates it.
Confirms below28.47
Invalidates at37.20
Left Shoulder36.36
Head37.20
Right Shoulder33.72
Neckline28.47
Target19.74
LS 36.36 / head 37.20 / RS 33.72, neckline ~28.47, vol_fading=no
Predictive pattern recognition is educational — most forming structures never confirm. Wait for the confirmation level before treating this as a setup.
Highest daily volume since 2026-06-30 — 20,828,192 shares (2.4x average), 0 bars ago, and price action is constructive (closed up on the day). Big volume with holding prices means institutions are involved. Research/educational only, not a buy/sell recommendation. | Moderate trend (6/8) | High-confidence pattern (74%) | Volume surging | Stage 2 | Readiness 58/100 (early) | CANSLIM N/A (N/A) | ⚠ Not actionable yet
Grades the price structure — moving-average stacking, distance from the 52-week high/low, and relative strength above the ≥70 uptrend bar. This is the technical trend check; the company's fundamentals and ≥80 RS leadership are scored separately in the Grade Card.
✓
Price above SMA 150 & 200$35.37 vs SMA150 $29.62 / SMA200 $29.35
✓
SMA 150 above SMA 200SMA150 $29.62 vs SMA200 $29.35