Triggers when price crosses your target during market hours or after the next daily scan. Delivered via email and Telegram (if linked in Account).
Historical record
No active setup in the latest scan — this page shows the last detection Legend AI made for $WTW.
Every level, score and criterion below is computed from the Oct 26 close session (latest session), and may no longer hold.
Historical verdict · setup score 0/100 · data Oct 26 close · latest session
Stand aside — setup invalidated
Setup score 0, but distribution days reach 5 or more — stand aside until the condition resets.
Weinstein: watchStage-analysis read: Stage 2 is present; 3 supporting checks need improvement.
49Weak
Legend Score · rates the stockWeak (49/100) — held back by quality (smr-like)
Our proprietary 0-100 rating — the answer to Wall Street's black-box scores. Five pillars, each computed from real scan data, each explained below in plain English.
Relative Strength (25%)47
Trend Template (25%)62
Institutional Footprint (20%)50
EPS Growth (15%)50
Quality (SMR-like) (15%)30
RS rank 47: middle of the pack — no leadership yet. Trend template 5/8: mixed — some uptrend elements, some missing. Institutional score 50: neutral — no clear institutional conviction. No recent earnings growth data — scored neutral. Quality 30: weak fundamentals (sales growth 30).
Updated 2026-10-27.
Earnings
Pre-earnings setup
Next earnings
Wednesday, October 28, 2026Before market open
Exact clock time not supplied by source
Ordinary position sizing suppressed.
Earnings are less than three full trading sessions away; treat the gap as event risk, not ordinary stop-distance risk.
Deterministic evidence
WTW-0.10%
Sector proxy · XLF+0.21%
Broad market · SPY+0.71%
Same completed session window ending 2026-10-26.
WTW was -0.31 points vs XLF.
-0.81 points vs SPY.
QQQ, SMH moved against the stock — no index confirmation.
A sourced earnings report is still pending inside the risk window; ordinary technical conviction is reduced until it is out.
Price bars, sourced event fields, and benchmark math only. This can adjust displayed short-term conviction; it does not change the stored scanner score or readiness.
Generic technical analysis generated mechanically from price & volume — educational research only, not financial advice or a personalized recommendation. Levels are illustrative; confirm on your own chart. New to these terms? →
Legend Verdicts6 methodology checks
Who would consider this setup, why it qualifies, and what blocks it — calculated from the same deterministic methodology rules used across Legend AI. How to read the numbers: the setup score (0/100, in the verdict band) rates this trade setup. Each legend's A–D grade rates the same setup against that legend's own checklist — so a high score next to a C grade is not a contradiction. The setup can be strong without fitting that legend's style. When the council disagrees, the verdict band breaks the tie.
Council consensus:
6 of 9 legends are Watching — building, not yet a confirmed buy.
MinerviniAvoidDTrend-template read: fails 150-day MA > 200-day MA.
Passing evidence
✓1.1 Price > 150-day MA AND 200-day MAPrice $324.67, MA150 $293.59, MA200 $296.80
✓1.4 50-day MA > 150-day MA AND 200-day MAMA50 $315.88, MA150 $293.59, MA200 $296.80
Failing evidence
✕1.2 150-day MA > 200-day MAMA150 $293.59 vs MA200 $296.80
dennisWatchCTurtle read: no breakout yet. Price is pressing the 20-day high. The system waits for the print; it never anticipates.
Passing evidence
✓No breakdown below the 20-day channel20-day low $283.42
✓Volatility-unit sizing (1N ≈ 1% of equity)1N = $7.51 (2.31% of price); the Turtles size 1 unit so a 1N move ≈ 1% of equity, making the 2N stop ≈ 2% equity risk
zangerAvoidDZanger read: a hard gate is broken — either the pattern is not one of his six, or the entry is more than 5% past the breakout. He would not touch this.
Passing evidence
✓Partial-profit plan: sell 20-30% at +15-20%Scale 20-30% at $373.37-$389.60; trail the rest
✓Trail on the 10/20-day MA10-day MA $315.27 · 20-day MA $303.65 — exit the remainder on a close below the trail
Failing evidence
✕Named Zanger pattern onlywatchlist_candidate is not one of Zanger's six
zweigWatchDZweig read: part of his screen passes but not all: Insider buying; Price strength (RS ≥ 70) — wait for the full growth screen before treating this as a Zweig setup.
Passing evidence
✓Reasonable price for the growth (P/E ≤ 35)Trailing P/E 20.0x — no PEG or forward P/E stored
Fundamentals & leadership quality — Minervini’s published criteria · 2/7 met
C
2/7 criteria
Separate score from the Minervini Trend Template (5/8): the Trend Template grades the price structure, this grades the company & leadership (earnings, sales, margins, RS rank). A stock can ride a clean trend while its fundamentals lag, so the two often differ by design — they are not the same checklist.
Minervini D · Avoid — The deterministic methodology check is Avoid; wait until the blocking criteria are resolved.
Pivot
Pro level
Published-method rule: Use the tight base's structural pivot; the setup must retain Trend Template leadership into the trigger. Evidence: Canonical setup geometry is available with Pro.
Entry trigger
Pro level
Published-method rule: Require a decisive move through the pivot with volume confirmation, and do not initiate more than 5% above it. Evidence: Canonical setup geometry is available with Pro.
Initial stop
Pro level
Published-method rule: Start at the tighter structural invalidation; the initial loss limit must not exceed roughly 7–8% from entry. Evidence: Canonical setup geometry is available with Pro.
Trail
Rule-based
Published-method rule: Hold the initial stop until the trade proves itself; near +1R move to breakeven, then trail a higher low or rising 10/21-day average once well extended. Evidence: Planned management rule; no stored stop or broker order is changed automatically.
Exit / invalidation
Pro level
Published-method rule: Exit when the structural stop or a meaningful higher-low/short-term trend violation fires; never widen the stop. Evidence: Canonical setup geometry is available with Pro.
Deterministic educational plan, not a recommendation. No order or stop is changed automatically. Method and sources →
Cup base building — 61% of the 19%-deep cup recovered. Watch for the right side to reach ~351.51, then a handle.
Confirms above351.51
Invalidates at317.47
Rim351.51
Cup Low283.42
Pivot351.51
Mid Cup317.47
Cup depth 19%, recovery 61%, handle=not yet
Predictive pattern recognition is educational — most forming structures never confirm. Wait for the confirmation level before treating this as a setup.
Grades the price structure — moving-average stacking, distance from the 52-week high/low, and relative strength above the ≥70 uptrend bar. This is the technical trend check; the company's fundamentals and ≥80 RS leadership are scored separately in the Grade Card.
✓
Price above SMA 150 & 200$324.67 vs SMA150 $293.59 / SMA200 $296.80
✗
SMA 150 above SMA 200SMA150 $293.59 vs SMA200 $296.80