Uptrend Under Pressure 100
Institutional selling is building — 7 distribution days in the last 25 sessions. Severe risk · 100/100 · 7 distribution days (SPY) Oct 26 Full briefing →
View
Simple research view

XLF

$56.02 +0.21% Oct 26 close
Detected setup watchlist_candidate · Setup Score 0/100

Stand aside — setup invalidated

Setup score 0, but distribution days reach 5 or more — stand aside until the condition resets.

2 independent risk warnings also present. Review before relying on the bullish setup.

Ask about XLF

Switch to Advanced for indicator panels, raw grades, provenance, drawing tools, and full technical tables.

$XLF

etf Stage 2 · Advancing Base 1
$56.02 latest close
Market Structure
Trend structure: uptrend
Latest event: structure_shift (bearish)
Support 49.95–50.81 · 7 touches · strong
Support 54.34–54.68 · 4 touches · moderate
Support 53.19–53.46 · 4 touches · moderate
Resistance 58.30–58.60 · 4 touches · moderate
Support 52.61–52.81 · 4 touches · moderate
Historical record

No active setup in the latest scan — this page shows the last detection Legend AI made for $XLF. Every level, score and criterion below is computed from the Oct 26 close session (latest session), and may no longer hold.

Historical verdict · setup score 0/100 · data Oct 26 close · latest session

Stand aside — setup invalidated

Setup score 0, but distribution days reach 5 or more — stand aside until the condition resets.

Recent price action · daily
$55.00$57.50AugSepOct$56.02

What would change this verdict

What needs to turn for this to become buyable — the top failing checks across the legend council:

  • Minervini 1.5 Price > 50-day MA — Price $56.02 vs MA50 $56.03
  • Minervini 1.8 RS rank ≥ 70 (prefer ≥ 85) — RS rank 45
  • O'Neil L: RS rank ≥ 80 (IBD leadership) — RS rank 45
  • O'Neil M: Market in confirmed uptrend — Market phase: uptrend_under_pressure
  • Weinstein Volume expansion above average — Volume ratio 0.68x
  • Weinstein Relative strength ≥ 60 — RS 45
Minority view — the council disagrees here
  • Minervini: avoid Trend-template read: fails Price > 50-day MA.
  • O'Neil: avoid CANSLIM read: fails L: RS rank ≥ 80 (IBD leadership).
  • Weinstein: watch Stage-analysis read: Stage 2 is present; 3 supporting checks need improvement.
52 Neutral
Legend Score · rates the stock Neutral (52/100) — held back by relative strength

Our proprietary 0-100 rating — the answer to Wall Street's black-box scores. Five pillars, each computed from real scan data, each explained below in plain English.

  • Relative Strength (25%) 45
  • Trend Template (25%) 50
  • Institutional Footprint (20%) 68
  • EPS Growth (15%) 50
  • Quality (SMR-like) (15%) 50

RS rank 45: middle of the pack — no leadership yet. Trend template 4/8: mixed — some uptrend elements, some missing. Institutional score 68: mild accumulation. No recent earnings growth data — scored neutral. No sales/ROE data — scored neutral. Updated 2026-10-26.

Price $56.02 +0.2% Oct 26 close
52W High $58.60 4.6% below high
Wks Since High 7w
Base Depth 8.8% 9.9% today
RS Rank 8 percentile of scan
SMA 50 $56.03
Avg Vol 34,058,986
Rel Vol (Oct 26) 0.68× 1.27× on up days
More stats
52W Low $47.67
Tight Wks 8 10 today
Base B1
SMA 200 $53.69
RS Line vs High -9.9%
RS Line Slope +3.9% ▲
ADR% 1.1%
ATR(14) $0.72 (1.3%)
Vol Pace (live) N/A
A/D Days 8A / 15D
A/D Rating E
VDU Bars 0/10 d
Position in 52-week range 76thpercentile of the 52-week range
$47.67low
$58.60high

XLF Chart

Interactive price, volume, RS, RSI, and MACD charts are available after sign in.

Create a free account to load the full interactive chart for XLF.

Create Free Account

Technical Analysis Report Card

$XLF · $56.02 · as of 2026-10-26 · multi-factor read
70
/ 100
Technicals 70/100
Reference read from price & volume only — the verdict at the top of the page decides the action.

Trend · Daily / Weekly / Monthly

Daily ▬ Sideways / consolidating
Weekly ▬ Sideways / consolidating
Monthly ▬ Sideways / consolidating

Moving Averages

50-day$56.03 ↓
100-day$55.75 ↑
200-day$53.69 ↑
Bullish (50 > 200)

RSI (14)

Reading56.0 · Bullish

Bullish momentum — comfortably in buyer territory.

MACD (12/26/9)

StateBullish
Histogram+0.273

Bullish — MACD above its signal line and above zero. Histogram contracting.

Bollinger Bands (20,2)

%B / Width82% · 7.2%

Near the upper band — buyers in control.

Volume · Buyer vs Seller

Up/Down vol1.27 · Neutral
Rel volume0.68×
Pocket pivots · 10d1
5d vs 50d vol79%
Heavy vol up / down0 / 2

Balanced — up/down volume is roughly even; no clear hand. Recent volume is easing versus its baseline.

  • Pocket pivot 7 sessions ago — up-day volume beat every down day of the prior 10 sessions.
  • 2 heavy-volume down days vs 0 up in the last 20 sessions — supply is showing.

Support & Resistance

R · $56.94swing level
R · $58.5052-week high
Price · $56.02now
S · $55.45swing level
S · $53.01swing level
S · $50.97swing level

Fibonacci · Uptrend swing

23.6% ◄ price here$56.69
38.2% ◄ price here$55.51
50.0%$54.56
61.8%$53.61
78.6%$52.25

Retracement support zones measured from the recent swing low up to the high.

The verdict is free. The trade plan is Pro.
Unlock the exact entry, stop-loss, profit target, and reward-to-risk for XLF — plus the full 500+ symbol scanner and Ask-the-Legends chat.
Start your 7-day free trial →
Above 200-day MA50/200 bullish
Want this read in a legend's voice? Ask a Legend about XLF
Generic technical analysis generated mechanically from price & volume — educational research only, not financial advice or a personalized recommendation. Levels are illustrative; confirm on your own chart. New to these terms? →
Legend Verdicts 6 methodology checks

Who would consider this setup, why it qualifies, and what blocks it — calculated from the same deterministic methodology rules used across Legend AI.
How to read the numbers: the setup score (0/100, in the verdict band) rates this trade setup. Each legend's A–D grade rates the same setup against that legend's own checklist — so a high score next to a C grade is not a contradiction. The setup can be strong without fitting that legend's style. When the council disagrees, the verdict band breaks the tie.

Council consensus: 6 of 9 legends are Watching — building, not yet a confirmed buy.
Minervini Avoid C Trend-template read: fails Price > 50-day MA.
Passing evidence
1.1 Price > 150-day MA AND 200-day MAPrice $56.02, MA150 $54.21, MA200 $53.69
1.2 150-day MA > 200-day MAMA150 $54.21 vs MA200 $53.69
Failing evidence
1.5 Price > 50-day MAPrice $56.02 vs MA50 $56.03
1.8 RS rank ≥ 70 (prefer ≥ 85)RS rank 45
Not applicable
2. Quarterly EPS growth ≥ 25%No single-company earnings — not applicable to ETFs
2. ROE ≥ 17%No single-company earnings — not applicable to ETFs
2. Revenue growth ≥ 20% YoYNo single-company earnings — not applicable to ETFs
5/7 checks
O'Neil Avoid D CANSLIM read: fails L: RS rank ≥ 80 (IBD leadership).
Passing evidence
N: Near 52-week high or RS line new high4.4% below high | RS line new high: False
S: Base tightness (ATR% ≤ 4.5%)ATR% 1.28%
Failing evidence
L: RS rank ≥ 80 (IBD leadership)RS rank 45
M: Market in confirmed uptrendMarket phase: uptrend_under_pressure
Not applicable
C: Quarterly EPS acceleration ≥ 25%No single-company earnings — not applicable to ETFs
A: Annual earnings & revenue qualityNo single-company earnings — not applicable to ETFs
2/6 checks
Weinstein Watch D Stage-analysis read: Stage 2 is present; 3 supporting checks need improvement.

partialStage 2 uptrend in progress — hold as long as price stays above the 30-week moving average.

Passing evidence
Stage 2 (Advancing phase) confirmedStage 2 (Advancing)
Price above 30-week MA (200-day proxy)Price $56.02 vs MA200 $53.69
Failing evidence
Volume expansion above averageVolume ratio 0.68x
Relative strength ≥ 60RS 45
3/6 checks
dennis Watch C Turtle read: no breakout yet. Price is pressing the 20-day high. The system waits for the print; it never anticipates.
Passing evidence
No breakdown below the 20-day channel20-day low $52.81
Volatility-unit sizing (1N ≈ 1% of equity)1N = $0.70 (1.25% of price); the Turtles size 1 unit so a 1N move ≈ 1% of equity, making the 2N stop ≈ 2% equity risk
Failing evidence
S1: 20-day Donchian breakoutNot confirmed
S2: 55-day Donchian breakoutNot confirmed
5/7 checks
zanger Avoid D Zanger read: a hard gate is broken — either the pattern is not one of his six, or the entry is more than 5% past the breakout. He would not touch this.
Passing evidence
Partial-profit plan: sell 20-30% at +15-20%Scale 20-30% at $64.42-$67.22; trail the rest
Trail on the 10/20-day MA10-day MA $55.55 · 20-day MA $54.78 — exit the remainder on a close below the trail
Failing evidence
Named Zanger pattern onlywatchlist_candidate is not one of Zanger's six
Not extended (≤5% above the breakout point)Data unavailable
3/6 checks
zweig Watch D Zweig read: part of his screen passes but not all: Price strength (RS ≥ 70) — wait for the full growth screen before treating this as a Zweig setup.
Passing evidence
Breadth momentum: 10-day A/D ratio10-day A/D 1.17 (2084 adv / 1781 dec) — participation expanding
Failing evidence
Price strength (RS ≥ 70)RS score 45 — Zweig buys strength, not bargains
4% Model (breadth proxy)60% of universe above 50-day — mixed participation, no thrust
Not applicable
EPS growth above the marketNo single-company earnings — not applicable to ETFs
Reasonable price for the growthNo single-company earnings — not applicable to ETFs
Insider buyingNo single-company earnings — not applicable to ETFs
1/5 checks
Livermore Watch B Pivotal-point read: constructive evidence is present, but relative strength is unresolved.
Passing evidence
Price$56.02
Distance from 52-week high4.4% below high
Failing evidence
Relative strengthRS 45
Volume vs average0.68x
3/6 checks
Darvas Watch B Box-theory read: constructive evidence is present, but relative strength is unresolved.
Passing evidence
Price$56.02
Distance from 52-week high4.4% below high
Failing evidence
Relative strengthRS 45
Volume vs average0.68x
3/6 checks
Wyckoff Watch B Supply-and-demand read: constructive evidence is present, but relative strength is unresolved.
Passing evidence
Price$56.02
Distance from 52-week high4.4% below high
Failing evidence
Relative strengthRS 45
Volume vs average0.68x
3/6 checks
Base & Breakout
Breakout follow-through

No active breakout tracked — Legend AI monitors daily for pivot-point breaks. What's a breakout?

Latest candle: Shooting Star — Long upper shadow with a small body near the low — sellers rejected higher prices. A caution flag when price is extended above a pivot.

RS Line vs SPY 52-week relative strength · blue = RS line · dashed = MA50 · dot = NH ▲ Rising
94RS Line (52W)
Accumulation / Distribution last 65 sessions · green = acc on high vol · red = dist on high vol Net -2 E
A: 13 D: 15 Net: -265 sessions
Minervini · Grade Card
Fundamentals & leadership quality — Minervini’s published criteria · 2/3 met · earnings criteria N/A for ETFs
A 2/3 criteria
Separate score from the Minervini Trend Template (4/8): the Trend Template grades the price structure, this grades the company & leadership (earnings, sales, margins, RS rank). A stock can ride a clean trend while its fundamentals lag, so the two often differ by design — they are not the same checklist.
– EPS acceleration ≥25% QoQ N/A
– Revenue growth ≥20% YoY N/A
– Gross margin ≥30% N/A
– ROE ≥17% N/A
✗ RS rating ≥80 (leadership) 45
✓ Stage 2 uptrend (Weinstein) Stage 2
✓ Within 25% of 52W high -4.4%

Method Playbook

Trade it like Wyckoff EXACT LEVELS · PRO
Wyckoff B · Watch — The deterministic methodology check is Watch; wait for the failing or incomplete criteria to improve before the trigger can qualify.
Pivot
Pro level
Published-method rule: Use the Spring/test, Sign of Strength, creek, or Last Point of Support boundary identified by the active structure.
Evidence: Canonical setup geometry is available with Pro.
Entry trigger
Pro level
Published-method rule: Require a completed test or Sign of Strength/Last Point of Support confirmation with improving demand versus supply.
Evidence: Canonical setup geometry is available with Pro.
Initial stop
Pro level
Published-method rule: Start below the Spring/test low or structural support whose failure would invalidate the accumulation read.
Evidence: Canonical setup geometry is available with Pro.
Trail
Rule-based
Published-method rule: Raise protection beneath successive Last Points of Support or meaningful higher lows during markup; never loosen it.
Evidence: Planned management rule; no stored stop or broker order is changed automatically.
Exit / invalidation
Pro level
Published-method rule: Exit on a failed Sign of Strength, support loss, or clear supply-dominant reversal such as an upthrust failure.
Evidence: Canonical setup geometry is available with Pro.
Deterministic educational plan, not a recommendation. No order or stop is changed automatically. Method and sources →

Pattern Analysis (historical)

0 setup score
RS Score 45
Trend template 4/8
Why This Setup?
watchlist_candidate · schematic

Near-miss 4/8 — needs: sma200 trending up, price above sma50, price above 30pct of 52w low, rs score above 70

The Universal Edge Check · context only

What the setup still has going for it, recorded for later. The verdict above stands — these principles do not overrule it.

1/7 universals met
  • A relative-strength leader — not met RS rank 8 — laggard
  • Risk is defined — not met No stop — undefined risk
  • Asymmetric reward — partly met No target set
  • Clear of earnings — partly met Report date unknown
  • Not chasing (in range) — partly met Pivot distance unknown
  • Volume confirms — partly met 0.8× average — light
  • In a confirmed uptrend — met Stage 2 · Trend template 4/8
Why these seven? → The Universal Edge

Minervini Trend Template

4/8

Grades the price structure — moving-average stacking, distance from the 52-week high/low, and relative strength above the ≥70 uptrend bar. This is the technical trend check; the company's fundamentals and ≥80 RS leadership are scored separately in the Grade Card.

Price above SMA 150 & 200 $56.02 vs SMA150 $54.21 / SMA200 $53.69
SMA 150 above SMA 200 SMA150 $54.21 vs SMA200 $53.69
SMA 200 trending up Slope -0.04 over 20 days
SMA 50 above SMA 150 & 200 SMA50 $56.03
Price above SMA 50 $56.02 vs SMA50 $56.03
30%+ above 52-week low +17.5% from $47.67
Within 25% of 52-week high -4.4% from $58.60
RS score above 70 RS 45

Fundamentals

52W Range
76%
Insider
No Buy

Company

Company profile
XLF
XLF

Scan History

Aug 11: 0 (watchlist_candidate)Oct 22: 0 (watchlist_candidate)Oct 23: 0 (watchlist_candidate)Oct 26: 0 (watchlist_candidate)0
Oct 26
watchlist_candidate
0
Oct 23
watchlist_candidate
0 +0.2%
Oct 22
watchlist_candidate
0 -1.1%
Aug 11
watchlist_candidate
0 -3.1%

Latest News

Headlines for XLF
Loading headlines…

Get the full picture on XLF

Pro members see entry/stop/target levels, R:R ratios, intraday alerts, and every setup detected across 500+ symbols daily.

Start 7-Day Free Trial