Uptrend Under Pressure 100
Institutional selling is building — 7 distribution days in the last 25 sessions. Severe risk · 100/100 · 7 distribution days (SPY) Oct 26 Full briefing →
View
Simple research view

ZION · Zions Bancorporation N.A.

$65.93 -0.41% Oct 26 close
Detected setup Falling Wedge · Setup Score 55/100

Stand aside — setup invalidated

Setup score 55, but distribution days reach 5 or more — stand aside until the condition resets.

Ask about ZION

Switch to Advanced for indicator panels, raw grades, provenance, drawing tools, and full technical tables.

$ZION

Zions Bancorporation N.A.

Zions Bancorporation N.A. is a mid-cap Major Banks company in the Finance sector with a market cap of $10B.

Finance Major Banks stock Stage 2 · Advancing Base 2
$65.93 latest close
Market Structure
Trend structure: downtrend
Latest event: structure_shift (bearish)
Support 60.60–61.05 · 5 touches · strong
Support 57.77–58.00 · 3 touches · moderate
Resistance 67.75–68.02 · 3 touches · moderate
Support 63.39–63.85 · 3 touches · moderate
Support 61.35–61.76 · 3 touches · moderate
Verdict · setup score 55/100 · data Oct 26 close · latest session

Stand aside — setup invalidated

Setup score 55, but distribution days reach 5 or more — stand aside until the condition resets.

Recent price action · daily
$65.00$70.00AugSepOct$65.93

What would change this verdict

What needs to turn for this to become buyable — the top failing checks across the legend council:

  • Minervini 1.8 RS rank ≥ 70 (prefer ≥ 85) — RS rank 55
  • Minervini 2. Quarterly EPS growth ≥ 25% — -11.4% QoQ
  • O'Neil C: Quarterly EPS acceleration ≥ 25% — -11.4% QoQ
  • O'Neil L: RS rank ≥ 80 (IBD leadership) — RS rank 55
  • Weinstein Volume expansion above average — Volume ratio 1.07x
  • Weinstein Relative strength ≥ 60 — RS 55
Minority view — the council disagrees here
  • Minervini: watch Trend-template read: 7/13 pass; wait for the soft misses to improve.
  • O'Neil: avoid CANSLIM read: fails C: Quarterly EPS acceleration ≥ 25%.
  • Weinstein: watch Stage-analysis read: Stage 2 is present; 3 supporting checks need improvement.
60 Neutral
Legend Score · rates the stock Neutral (60/100) — held back by eps growth

Our proprietary 0-100 rating — the answer to Wall Street's black-box scores. Five pillars, each computed from real scan data, each explained below in plain English.

  • Relative Strength (25%) 55
  • Trend Template (25%) 88
  • Institutional Footprint (20%) 68
  • EPS Growth (15%) 30
  • Quality (SMR-like) (15%) 44

RS rank 55: middle of the pack — no leadership yet. Trend template 7/8: price above rising 50/150/200-day lines — textbook uptrend structure. Institutional score 68: mild accumulation. EPS -0% last quarter — no earnings momentum. Quality 44: weak fundamentals (sales growth 30, return on equity 41, leverage 100). Updated 2026-10-27.

Earnings

Normal technical setup

Next earnings Monday, October 19, 2026 After market close Exact clock time not supplied by source

Deterministic evidence

Reported EPS 1.78 vs estimate 1.6994 · surprise +4.7%

ZION-0.41%
Sector proxy · XLF+0.21%
Broad market · SPY+0.71%
Same completed session window ending 2026-10-26. ZION was -0.62 points vs XLF. -1.12 points vs SPY.

Session internals Weak

Rule: closed flat-to-down and in the bottom third of the range. Judged on internals, not on the size of the move.

Vs prior close-0.41% From the open-0.84% Range position9% GapNo gap
QQQ confirmationDiverging (+1.11%) SMH confirmationDiverging (+2.74%)
Short-term conviction -2 points.
  • Positive catalyst received negative stock confirmation.
  • QQQ, SMH moved against the stock — no index confirmation.
Price bars, sourced event fields, and benchmark math only. This can adjust displayed short-term conviction; it does not change the stored scanner score or readiness.

Ask a Legend to interpret this evidence → Commentary only — never scanner evidence or a sizing recommendation.

Price $65.93 -0.4% Oct 26 close
52W High $73.34 10.1% below high
Wks Since High 14w
Base Depth 17.2%
RS Rank 17 percentile of scan
SMA 50 $65.67
Avg Vol 1,518,099
Rel Vol (Oct 26) 1.07× 1.92× on up days
More stats
52W Low $48.50
Tight Wks 2
Base B2
SMA 200 $63.71
RS Line vs High -11.8%
RS Line Slope +5.1% ▲
Group Rank #49/66
ADR% 2.0%
ATR(14) $1.35 (2.0%)
Vol Pace (live) N/A
A/D Days 9A / 13D
A/D Rating E
VDU Bars 0/10 d
Earnings past
Position in 52-week range 70thpercentile of the 52-week range
$48.50low
$73.34high

ZION Chart

Interactive price, volume, RS, RSI, and MACD charts are available after sign in.

Create a free account to load the full interactive chart for ZION.

Create Free Account

Technical Analysis Report Card

$ZION · $65.93 · as of 2026-10-26 · multi-factor read
77
/ 100
Technicals 77/100
Reference read from price & volume only — the verdict at the top of the page decides the action.

Trend · Daily / Weekly / Monthly

Daily ▬ Sideways / consolidating
Weekly ▬ Sideways / consolidating
Monthly ▬ Sideways / consolidating

Moving Averages

50-day$65.67 ↑
100-day$67.41 ↓
200-day$63.71 ↑
Bullish (50 > 200)

RSI (14)

Reading59.1 · Bullish

Bullish momentum — comfortably in buyer territory.

MACD (12/26/9)

StateBullish
Histogram+0.617

Bullish — MACD above its signal line and above zero. Histogram contracting.

Bollinger Bands (20,2)

%B / Width92% · 9.2%

Near the upper band — buyers in control.

Volume · Buyer vs Seller

Up/Down vol1.92 · Accumulation
Rel volume1.07×
Pocket pivots · 10d4
5d vs 50d vol149%
Heavy vol up / down1 / 0

Accumulation — volume is concentrated on up days; buyers dominate. Recent volume is expanding versus its baseline.

  • Pocket pivot 2 sessions ago — up-day volume beat every down day of the prior 10 sessions.
  • 1 heavy-volume up day vs 0 down in the last 20 sessions.

Support & Resistance

R · $70.13swing level
R · $71.26swing level
R · $72.9952-week high
Price · $65.93now
S · $60.92swing level
S · $58.99swing level
S · $48.5052-week low

Fibonacci · Uptrend swing

23.6%$69.95
38.2%$67.86
50.0% ◄ price here$66.17
61.8%$64.47
78.6%$62.06

Retracement support zones measured from the recent swing low up to the high.

The verdict is free. The trade plan is Pro.
Unlock the exact entry, stop-loss, profit target, and reward-to-risk for ZION — plus the full 500+ symbol scanner and Ask-the-Legends chat.
Start your 7-day free trial →
Above 200-day MA50/200 bullishVolume accumulation
Want this read in a legend's voice? Ask a Legend about ZION
Generic technical analysis generated mechanically from price & volume — educational research only, not financial advice or a personalized recommendation. Levels are illustrative; confirm on your own chart. New to these terms? →
Legend Verdicts 6 methodology checks

Who would consider this setup, why it qualifies, and what blocks it — calculated from the same deterministic methodology rules used across Legend AI.
How to read the numbers: the setup score (55/100, in the verdict band) rates this trade setup. Each legend's A–D grade rates the same setup against that legend's own checklist — so a high score next to a C grade is not a contradiction. The setup can be strong without fitting that legend's style. When the council disagrees, the verdict band breaks the tie.

Council consensus: 7 of 9 legends are Watching — building, not yet a confirmed buy.
Minervini Watch D Trend-template read: 7/13 pass; wait for the soft misses to improve.
Passing evidence
1.1 Price > 150-day MA AND 200-day MAPrice $65.93, MA150 $65.26, MA200 $63.71
1.2 150-day MA > 200-day MAMA150 $65.26 vs MA200 $63.71
Failing evidence
1.8 RS rank ≥ 70 (prefer ≥ 85)RS rank 55
2. Quarterly EPS growth ≥ 25%-11.4% QoQ
7/13 checks
O'Neil Avoid D CANSLIM read: fails C: Quarterly EPS acceleration ≥ 25%.

partialRule check says AVOID (2/8 checks passed) — CANSLIM read: fails C: Quarterly EPS acceleration ≥ 25%.

Passing evidence
N: Near 52-week high or RS line new high10.1% below high | RS line new high: False
S: Base tightness (ATR% ≤ 4.5%)ATR% 2.04%
Failing evidence
C: Quarterly EPS acceleration ≥ 25%-11.4% QoQ
L: RS rank ≥ 80 (IBD leadership)RS rank 55
2/8 checks
Weinstein Watch C Stage-analysis read: Stage 2 is present; 3 supporting checks need improvement.

mediumClassic Stage 2 advancing phase — strong weekly trend confirms uptrend. This is Weinstein's sweet spot: buy and hold while price remains above the 30-week MA.

Passing evidence
Stage 2 (Advancing phase) confirmedStage 2 (Advancing)
Price above 30-week MA (200-day proxy)Price $65.93 vs MA200 $63.71
Failing evidence
Volume expansion above averageVolume ratio 1.07x
Relative strength ≥ 60RS 55
4/7 checks
dennis Watch C Turtle read: no breakout yet. Price is pressing the 20-day high. The system waits for the print; it never anticipates.
Passing evidence
No breakdown below the 20-day channel20-day low $60.76
Volatility-unit sizing (1N ≈ 1% of equity)1N = $1.37 (2.08% of price); the Turtles size 1 unit so a 1N move ≈ 1% of equity, making the 2N stop ≈ 2% equity risk
Failing evidence
S1: 20-day Donchian breakoutNot confirmed
S2: 55-day Donchian breakoutNot confirmed
5/8 checks
zanger Avoid D Zanger read: a hard gate is broken — either the pattern is not one of his six, or the entry is more than 5% past the breakout. He would not touch this.
Passing evidence
Partial-profit plan: sell 20-30% at +15-20%Scale 20-30% at $75.82-$79.12; trail the rest
Trail on the 10/20-day MA10-day MA $64.23 · 20-day MA $63.47 — exit the remainder on a close below the trail
Failing evidence
Named Zanger pattern onlyFalling Wedge is not one of Zanger's six
Not extended (≤5% above the breakout point)Not confirmed
3/6 checks
zweig Watch D Zweig read: part of his screen passes but not all: EPS growth above the market (≥15% QoQ); Insider buying; Price strength (RS ≥ 70) — wait for the full growth screen before treating this as a Zweig setup.
Passing evidence
Reasonable price for the growth (P/E ≤ 35)Trailing P/E 11.0x — no PEG or forward P/E stored
Breadth momentum: 10-day A/D ratio10-day A/D 1.18 (2050 adv / 1742 dec) — participation expanding
Failing evidence
EPS growth above the market (≥15% QoQ)-11.4% QoQ — Zweig wants growth above the S&P average
Insider buyingNo insider buying flagged
3/8 checks
Livermore Watch B Pivotal-point read: constructive evidence is present, but relative strength is unresolved.
Passing evidence
Price$65.93
Distance from 52-week high10.1% below high
Failing evidence
Relative strengthRS 55
Volume vs average1.07x
3/6 checks
Darvas Watch B Box-theory read: constructive evidence is present, but relative strength is unresolved.
Passing evidence
Price$65.93
Distance from 52-week high10.1% below high
Failing evidence
Relative strengthRS 55
Volume vs average1.07x
3/6 checks
Wyckoff Watch B Supply-and-demand read: constructive evidence is present, but relative strength is unresolved.
Passing evidence
Price$65.93
Distance from 52-week high10.1% below high
Failing evidence
Relative strengthRS 55
Volume vs average1.07x
3/6 checks
Base & Breakout
Breakout follow-through

No active breakout tracked — Legend AI monitors daily for pivot-point breaks. What's a breakout?

RS Line vs SPY 52-week relative strength · blue = RS line · dashed = MA50 · dot = NH ▲ Rising
112RS Line (52W)
Accumulation / Distribution last 65 sessions · green = acc on high vol · red = dist on high vol Net -8 E
A: 9 D: 17 Net: -865 sessions
Minervini · Grade Card
Fundamentals & leadership quality — Minervini’s published criteria · 2/7 met
C 2/7 criteria
Separate score from the Minervini Trend Template (7/8): the Trend Template grades the price structure, this grades the company & leadership (earnings, sales, margins, RS rank). A stock can ride a clean trend while its fundamentals lag, so the two often differ by design — they are not the same checklist.
✗ EPS acceleration ≥25% QoQ -11%
✗ Revenue growth ≥20% YoY +4%
✗ Gross margin ≥30% —
✗ ROE ≥17% 14%
✗ RS rating ≥80 (leadership) 55
✓ Stage 2 uptrend (Weinstein) Stage 2
✓ Within 25% of 52W high -10.1%

Method Playbook

Trade it like Darvas EXACT LEVELS · PRO
Darvas B · Watch — The deterministic methodology check is Watch; wait for the failing or incomplete criteria to improve before the trigger can qualify.
Pivot
Pro level
Published-method rule: Use the top of the active Darvas box near the high as the mechanical breakout boundary.
Evidence: Canonical setup geometry is available with Pro.
Entry trigger
Pro level
Published-method rule: Require price to clear the box top with volume confirmation; movement inside the box remains observation, not a trigger.
Evidence: Canonical setup geometry is available with Pro.
Initial stop
Pro level
Published-method rule: Start below the active box support or the canonical structural stop that proves the breakout failed.
Evidence: Canonical setup geometry is available with Pro.
Trail
Rule-based
Published-method rule: As higher boxes form, raise the stop beneath the newest confirmed box floor; the stop moves up only.
Evidence: Planned management rule; no stored stop or broker order is changed automatically.
Exit / invalidation
Pro level
Published-method rule: Exit when price breaks the active box floor or decisively falls back through the breakout structure.
Evidence: Canonical setup geometry is available with Pro.
Deterministic educational plan, not a recommendation. No order or stop is changed automatically. Method and sources →

Pattern Analysis

Falling Wedge ⚠ Extended past buy zone ⚠ 3rd-stage base ⚠ Not actionable yet
55 setup score
RS Score 55
Trend template 7/8
CANSLIM 57.5* (C)
upper slope: -0.3056 lower slope: -0.1905 depth: 0.0206 narrowing ratio: 0.119 prior decline: 0.172 upper touches: 2 lower touches: 2 vol declining: ✗ validation reason: valid generic setup multi tf evaluated: ✓ multi tf reason: weekly trend template 7/8 confirmed
Why This Setup? D+W Confluence
Falling Wedge · schematic

prior_decline=17.2%, converging=yes, narrowing=12%, touches=upper:2/lower:2, near_upper=yes | Strong trend (7/8) | High-confidence pattern (70%) | Accumulation (1.9× up/dn vol) | Stage 2 | Tight base (2 tight wks) | Readiness 45/100 (early) | CANSLIM 57.5 (C) | ⚠ Extended past buy zone; 3rd-stage base; Not actionable yet

Record Volume ⚠ 3rd-stage base ⚠ Not actionable yet
55 setup score
RS Score 55
Trend template 7/8
CANSLIM 59.5* (C)
cadence: daily lookback bars: 260 detector version: record_volume/2026-09-27 record bar ago: 4 record volume: 3388850 volume multiple: 2.39 volume ratio: 2.395 rare tier: ✗ bars since bigger: 64 since date: 2026-07-21 callout text: Highest daily volume since 2026-07-21 up day: ✓ absorbed: ✓ low held: ✓ day gain pct: 2.18 depth pct: 2.18 day range pct: 3.8 geometry: {'record_bar': {'bar': 255, 'bars_ago': 4, 'price': 64.59, 'date': '2026-10-20'}, 'record_volume': 3388850, 'callout_text': 'Highest daily volume since 2026-07-21', 'arrow_target': {'bar': 255, 'bars_ago': 4, 'price': 64.59, 'date': '2026-10-20'}} confidence kind: heuristic_match findings: ['Highest daily volume since 2026-07-21: 3,388,850 shares (2.4x the trailing average)', 'Price action constructive — closed up on the day (record bar $63.21 -> $64.59, now $65.93)'] validation reason: valid generic setup multi tf evaluated: ✓ multi tf reason: weekly: MA stabilizing or rising — accumulation context supported
Why This Setup? D+W Confluence
Record Volume · schematic

Highest daily volume since 2026-07-21 — 3,388,850 shares (2.4x average), 4 bars ago, and price action is constructive (closed up on the day). Big volume with holding prices means institutions are involved. Research/educational only, not a buy/sell recommendation. | Strong trend (7/8) | High-confidence pattern (70%) | Accumulation (1.9× up/dn vol) | Stage 2 | Tight base (2 tight wks) | Readiness 55/100 (early) | CANSLIM 59.5 (C) | ⚠ 3rd-stage base; Not actionable yet

The Universal Edge Check · context only

What the setup still has going for it, recorded for later. The verdict above stands — these principles do not overrule it.

3/7 universals met
  • A relative-strength leader — not met RS rank 17 — laggard
  • Clear of earnings — not met in -8 days — event risk
  • Not chasing (in range) — not met Not met — levels are a Pro detail
  • Volume confirms — partly met 1.1× average — light
  • Asymmetric reward — met Met — levels are a Pro detail
  • In a confirmed uptrend — met Stage 2 · Trend template 7/8
  • Risk is defined — met Met — levels are a Pro detail
Why these seven? → The Universal Edge

Minervini Trend Template

7/8

Grades the price structure — moving-average stacking, distance from the 52-week high/low, and relative strength above the ≥70 uptrend bar. This is the technical trend check; the company's fundamentals and ≥80 RS leadership are scored separately in the Grade Card.

Price above SMA 150 & 200 $65.93 vs SMA150 $65.26 / SMA200 $63.71
SMA 150 above SMA 200 SMA150 $65.26 vs SMA200 $63.71
SMA 200 trending up Slope +0.39 over 20 days
SMA 50 above SMA 150 & 200 SMA50 $65.67
Price above SMA 50 $65.93 vs SMA50 $65.67
30%+ above 52-week low +35.9% from $48.50
Within 25% of 52-week high -10.1% from $73.34
RS score above 70 RS 55

Fundamentals

52W Range
70%
Mkt Cap SEC
9.6B
EPS QoQ
-11%
Rev YoY
+4%
ROE
14%
D/E
0.64
EPS TTM
$6.01
P/E TTM
11.0x
Float
146M
Insider
No Buy

Company

Company profile
Zions Bancorporation N.A.
ZION · NASDAQ · Finance · Major Banks
O'Neil · Grade Card
CANSLIM — current EPS, annual EPS, new highs, supply, leader RS, inst. sponsorship, market
C 57.5* CANSLIM * disqualified on C, M
C · Curr. EPS
38
A · Annual EPS
67
N · New Highs
40
S · Supply/Demand
100
L · Leader RS
55
I · Inst. Spons.
100
M · Market
30

Weekly Context

Multi-timeframe signals from weekly bars
W. Trend
7/8
W. RS
57
W. Support
$58.99
W. Resist
$73.34
W. Patterns
Cup & Handle
Weekly Structure

Scan History

20× streak
Oct 23: 55 (Record Volume)Oct 23: 70 (Record Volume)Oct 26: 55 (Falling Wedge)Oct 27: 55 (Falling Wedge)55
Oct 27
Falling Wedge ✓ Gate
55
Oct 26
Falling Wedge ✓ Gate
55 0.0%
Oct 23
Record Volume
70 -0.4%
Oct 23
Record Volume ✓ Gate
55 -0.4%

Latest News

Headlines for ZION
Loading headlines…

Get the full picture on ZION

Pro members see entry/stop/target levels, R:R ratios, intraday alerts, and every setup detected across 500+ symbols daily.

Start 7-Day Free Trial