Uptrend Under Pressure 100
Institutional selling is building — 7 distribution days in the last 25 sessions. Severe risk · 100/100 · 7 distribution days (SPY) Oct 26 Full briefing →
View
Simple research view

NTAP · NetApp, Inc.

$222.08 +3.06% Oct 26 close
Detected setup Partial Move · Setup Score 80/100

Stand aside — setup invalidated

Setup score 80, but distribution days reach 5 or more — stand aside until the condition resets.

Ask about NTAP

Switch to Advanced for indicator panels, raw grades, provenance, drawing tools, and full technical tables.

$NTAP

NetApp, Inc.

NetApp, Inc. is a large-cap Computer Peripherals company in the Electronic Technology sector with a market cap of $44B.

Electronic Technology Computer Peripherals stock Stage 2 · Advancing Base 3+
$222.08 latest close
Market Structure
Trend structure: uptrend
Latest event: structure_shift (bearish)
Support 102.58–103.35 · 4 touches · moderate
Support 107.05–107.63 · 3 touches · moderate
Verdict · setup score 80/100 · data Oct 26 close · latest session

Stand aside — setup invalidated

Setup score 80, but distribution days reach 5 or more — stand aside until the condition resets.

Recent price action · daily
$200AugSepOct$222

What would change this verdict

What needs to turn for this to become buyable — the top failing checks across the legend council:

  • Minervini 2. Quarterly EPS growth ≥ 25% — +3.4% QoQ
  • Minervini 2. Revenue growth ≥ 20% YoY — +5.6% YoY
  • O'Neil C: Quarterly EPS acceleration ≥ 25% — +3.4% QoQ
  • O'Neil M: Market in confirmed uptrend — Market phase: uptrend_under_pressure
  • Weinstein Volume expansion above average — Volume ratio 0.97x
  • Weinstein Weekly price coiling (Stage 2 consolidation) — Tightening weekly range confirms base
Minority view — the council disagrees here
  • Minervini: watch Trend-template read: 10/12 pass; wait for the soft misses to improve.
  • O'Neil: avoid CANSLIM read: fails C: Quarterly EPS acceleration ≥ 25%.
  • Weinstein: watch Stage-analysis read: Stage 2 is present; 2 supporting checks need improvement.
73 Strong
Legend Score · rates the stock Strong (73/100) — held back by eps growth

Our proprietary 0-100 rating — the answer to Wall Street's black-box scores. Five pillars, each computed from real scan data, each explained below in plain English.

  • Relative Strength (25%) 97
  • Trend Template (25%) 100
  • Institutional Footprint (20%) 71
  • EPS Growth (15%) 30
  • Quality (SMR-like) (15%) 34

RS rank 96: top 4% of all stocks — true leadership. Trend template 8/8: price above rising 50/150/200-day lines — textbook uptrend structure. Institutional score 71: mild accumulation. EPS up +0% — growing, but below the 25% leadership bar. Quality 34: weak fundamentals (sales growth 30, return on equity 45, leverage 20). Updated 2026-10-27.

Earnings

Normal technical setup

Next earnings Tuesday, December 1, 2026 Report time not confirmed by the source

Deterministic evidence

NTAP+3.06%
Sector proxy · XLK+1.69%
Broad market · SPY+0.71%
Same completed session window ending 2026-10-26. NTAP was +1.37 points vs XLK. +2.35 points vs SPY.

Session internals Strong momentum

Rule: closed up, at or above the open, in the top third of the day's range. Judged on internals, not on the size of the move.

Vs prior close+3.06% From the open+2.03% Range position68% GapNo gap
QQQ confirmationConfirming (+1.11%) SMH confirmationConfirming (+2.74%)
Price bars, sourced event fields, and benchmark math only. This can adjust displayed short-term conviction; it does not change the stored scanner score or readiness.

Ask a Legend to interpret this evidence → Commentary only — never scanner evidence or a sizing recommendation.

Price $222.08 +3.1% Oct 26 close
52W High $240.87 7.8% below high
Wks Since High 1w
Base Depth 15.9%
RS Rank 93 percentile of scan
SMA 50 $203.72
Avg Vol 2,469,474
Rel Vol (Oct 26) 0.97× 2.06× on up days
More stats
52W Low $93.69
Tight Wks 0
Base B3
SMA 200 $147.85
RS Line vs High -5.6%
RS Line Slope +6.0% ▲
Group Rank #2/66
ADR% 3.8%
ATR(14) $9.22 (4.2%)
Vol Pace (live) N/A
A/D Days 15A / 9D
A/D Rating A+
VDU Bars 0/10 d
Power Trend 2d
Earnings in 35d
Position in 52-week range 87thpercentile of the 52-week range
$93.69low
$240.87high

NTAP Chart

Interactive price, volume, RS, RSI, and MACD charts are available after sign in.

Create a free account to load the full interactive chart for NTAP.

Create Free Account

Technical Analysis Report Card

$NTAP · $222.08 · as of 2026-10-26 · multi-factor read
98
/ 100
Technicals 98/100
Reference read from price & volume only — the verdict at the top of the page decides the action.

Trend · Daily / Weekly / Monthly

Daily ▲ Uptrend
Weekly ▲ Uptrend
Monthly ▲ Uptrend

Moving Averages

50-day$203.72 ↑
100-day$186.94 ↑
200-day$147.85 ↑
Bullish (50 > 200)

RSI (14)

Reading56.3 · Bullish

Bullish momentum — comfortably in buyer territory.

MACD (12/26/9)

StateWeakening
Histogram-1.907

Weakening — MACD slipped below its signal line. Histogram expanding.

Bollinger Bands (20,2)

%B / Width52% · 20.3%

Mid-band — no directional band edge in play.

Volume · Buyer vs Seller

Up/Down vol2.06 · Accumulation
Rel volume0.97×
Pocket pivots · 10d0
5d vs 50d vol66%
Heavy vol up / down1 / 0

Accumulation — volume is concentrated on up days; buyers dominate. Recent volume is easing versus its baseline.

  • 1 heavy-volume up day vs 0 down in the last 20 sessions.

Support & Resistance

R · $240.8752-week high
Price · $222.08now
S · $161.00swing level
S · $156.26swing level
S · $149.27swing level

Fibonacci · Uptrend swing

23.6%$210.08
38.2%$191.04
50.0%$175.65
61.8%$160.25
78.6%$138.34

Retracement support zones measured from the recent swing low up to the high.

The verdict is free. The trade plan is Pro.
Unlock the exact entry, stop-loss, profit target, and reward-to-risk for NTAP — plus the full 500+ symbol scanner and Ask-the-Legends chat.
Start your 7-day free trial →
Daily uptrendWeekly uptrendMonthly uptrendAbove 200-day MA50/200 bullishVolume accumulation
Want this read in a legend's voice? Ask a Legend about NTAP
Generic technical analysis generated mechanically from price & volume — educational research only, not financial advice or a personalized recommendation. Levels are illustrative; confirm on your own chart. New to these terms? →
Legend Verdicts 6 methodology checks

Who would consider this setup, why it qualifies, and what blocks it — calculated from the same deterministic methodology rules used across Legend AI.
How to read the numbers: the setup score (80/100, in the verdict band) rates this trade setup. Each legend's A–D grade rates the same setup against that legend's own checklist — so a high score next to a C grade is not a contradiction. The setup can be strong without fitting that legend's style. When the council disagrees, the verdict band breaks the tie.

Council consensus: 7 of 9 legends are Watching — building, not yet a confirmed buy.
Minervini Watch B Trend-template read: 10/12 pass; wait for the soft misses to improve.

partialEnter on break of $222.08 pivot with stop at $208.26 (risk 6.2%). SEPA Grade B (5/7).

Passing evidence
1.1 Price > 150-day MA AND 200-day MAPrice $222.08, MA150 $163.53, MA200 $147.85
1.2 150-day MA > 200-day MAMA150 $163.53 vs MA200 $147.85
Failing evidence
2. Quarterly EPS growth ≥ 25%+3.4% QoQ
2. Revenue growth ≥ 20% YoY+5.6% YoY
10/12 checks
O'Neil Avoid D CANSLIM read: fails C: Quarterly EPS acceleration ≥ 25%.

partialRule check says AVOID (4/8 checks passed) — CANSLIM read: fails C: Quarterly EPS acceleration ≥ 25%.

Passing evidence
L: RS rank ≥ 80 (IBD leadership)RS rank 96
A: Annual earnings & revenue qualityRev +5.6% | ROE 116.6%
Failing evidence
C: Quarterly EPS acceleration ≥ 25%+3.4% QoQ
M: Market in confirmed uptrendMarket phase: uptrend_under_pressure
4/8 checks
Weinstein Watch C Stage-analysis read: Stage 2 is present; 2 supporting checks need improvement.

mediumClassic Stage 2 advancing phase — strong weekly trend confirms uptrend. This is Weinstein's sweet spot: buy and hold while price remains above the 30-week MA.

Passing evidence
Stage 2 (Advancing phase) confirmedStage 2 (Advancing)
Price above 30-week MA (200-day proxy)Price $222.08 vs MA200 $147.85
Failing evidence
Volume expansion above averageVolume ratio 0.97x
Weekly price coiling (Stage 2 consolidation)Tightening weekly range confirms base
5/7 checks
dennis Watch C Turtle read: no Donchian signal. The system stays flat until price takes out the 20-day high.
Passing evidence
No breakdown below the 20-day channel20-day low $199.75
Volatility-unit sizing (1N ≈ 1% of equity)1N = $8.78 (3.95% of price); the Turtles size 1 unit so a 1N move ≈ 1% of equity, making the 2N stop ≈ 2% equity risk
Failing evidence
S1: 20-day Donchian breakoutNot confirmed
S2: 55-day Donchian breakoutNot confirmed
5/7 checks
zanger Avoid C Zanger read: a hard gate is broken — either the pattern is not one of his six, or the entry is more than 5% past the breakout. He would not touch this.
Passing evidence
Not extended (≤5% above the breakout point)Measured as passing
Partial-profit plan: sell 20-30% at +15-20%Scale 20-30% at $255.39-$266.50; trail the rest
Failing evidence
Named Zanger pattern onlyPartial Move is not one of Zanger's six
Breakout volume 1.5-2.0x averageData unavailable
4/6 checks
zweig Watch D Zweig read: part of his screen passes but not all: EPS growth above the market (≥15% QoQ); Insider buying — wait for the full growth screen before treating this as a Zweig setup.
Passing evidence
Reasonable price for the growth (P/E ≤ 35)Trailing P/E 35.0x — no PEG or forward P/E stored
Price strength (RS ≥ 70)RS score 96 — Zweig buys strength, not bargains
Failing evidence
EPS growth above the market (≥15% QoQ)+3.4% QoQ — Zweig wants growth above the S&P average
Insider buyingNo insider buying flagged
4/8 checks
Livermore Watch B Pivotal-point read: constructive evidence is present, but volume vs average is unresolved.
Passing evidence
Price$222.08
Relative strengthRS 96
Failing evidence
Volume vs average0.97x
Pivotal point cleared on expanding volumeNot confirmed
4/6 checks
Darvas Watch B Box-theory read: constructive evidence is present, but volume vs average is unresolved.

mediumBuilding the top of the box (7.8% from 52W high) — watch for a box breakout with volume expansion.

Passing evidence
Price$222.08
Relative strengthRS 96
Failing evidence
Volume vs average0.97x
Box top broken on heavy volumeNot confirmed
4/6 checks
Wyckoff Watch B Supply-and-demand read: constructive evidence is present, but volume vs average is unresolved.
Passing evidence
Price$222.08
Relative strengthRS 96
Failing evidence
Volume vs average0.97x
Sign of Strength confirmed on expanding volumePrice hasn't cleared the pivot yet — confirmation pending
4/6 checks
Base & Breakout
Breakout follow-through

No active breakout tracked — Legend AI monitors daily for pivot-point breaks. What's a breakout?

RS Line vs SPY 52-week relative strength · blue = RS line · dashed = MA50 · dot = NH ▲ Rising
170RS Line (52W)
Accumulation / Distribution last 65 sessions · green = acc on high vol · red = dist on high vol Net +10 A+
A: 20 D: 10 Net: +1065 sessions
Minervini · Grade Card
Fundamentals & leadership quality — Minervini’s published criteria · 5/7 met
B 5/7 criteria
Separate score from the Minervini Trend Template (8/8): the Trend Template grades the price structure, this grades the company & leadership (earnings, sales, margins, RS rank). A stock can ride a clean trend while its fundamentals lag, so the two often differ by design — they are not the same checklist.
✗ EPS acceleration ≥25% QoQ +3%
✗ Revenue growth ≥20% YoY +6%
✓ Gross margin ≥30% 70%
✓ ROE ≥17% 117%
✓ RS rating ≥80 (leadership) 96
✓ Stage 2 uptrend (Weinstein) Stage 2
✓ Within 25% of 52W high -7.8%

Method Playbook

Trade it like Wyckoff EXACT LEVELS · PRO
Wyckoff B · Watch — The deterministic methodology check is Watch; wait for the failing or incomplete criteria to improve before the trigger can qualify.
Pivot
Pro level
Published-method rule: Use the Spring/test, Sign of Strength, creek, or Last Point of Support boundary identified by the active structure.
Evidence: Canonical setup geometry is available with Pro.
Entry trigger
Pro level
Published-method rule: Require a completed test or Sign of Strength/Last Point of Support confirmation with improving demand versus supply.
Evidence: Canonical setup geometry is available with Pro.
Initial stop
Pro level
Published-method rule: Start below the Spring/test low or structural support whose failure would invalidate the accumulation read.
Evidence: Canonical setup geometry is available with Pro.
Trail
Rule-based
Published-method rule: Raise protection beneath successive Last Points of Support or meaningful higher lows during markup; never loosen it.
Evidence: Planned management rule; no stored stop or broker order is changed automatically.
Exit / invalidation
Pro level
Published-method rule: Exit on a failed Sign of Strength, support loss, or clear supply-dominant reversal such as an upthrust failure.
Evidence: Canonical setup geometry is available with Pro.
Deterministic educational plan, not a recommendation. No order or stop is changed automatically. Method and sources →

Forming Patterns (predictive — not confirmed)

Head & Shoulders bearish forming
75% built

Possible head & shoulders top — not confirmed. Watch for a daily close below ~207.75 (neckline) to confirm, with measured-move risk toward ~174.64. A push back above 224.60 weakens the pattern; reclaiming 240.87 invalidates it.

Confirms below 207.75
Invalidates at 240.87
Left Shoulder 209.06
Head 240.87
Right Shoulder 224.60
Neckline 207.75
Target 174.64

LS 209.06 / head 240.87 / RS 224.60, neckline ~207.75, vol_fading=yes

Predictive pattern recognition is educational — most forming structures never confirm. Wait for the confirmation level before treating this as a setup.

Pattern Analysis

Partial Move ⚠ Late-stage base (#4)
80 setup score
RS Score 96
Trend template 8/8 ✓
CANSLIM 74.9* (B)
predictor: ✓ predicted direction: up probability: 0.72 retrace pct: 48.0 formation low: 161.0 formation high: 240.87 volume ratio: 0.675 depth pct: 33.16 validation reason: valid generic setup multi tf evaluated: ✓ multi tf reason: weekly trend template 8/8 confirmed
Why This Setup?
Partial Move · schematic

Partial decline stalled at 48.0% of range (161.00–240.87) without touching the bottom; predicts upward break ~72% of the time. Predictor — breakout not confirmed. | Strong trend (8/8) | Top RS (96) | High-confidence pattern (72%) | Accumulation (2.1× up/dn vol) | Stage 2 | Readiness 65/100 (watch) | CANSLIM 74.9 (B) | ⚠ Late-stage base (#4)

Darvas Box ⚠ Volatility widening into breakout ⚠ Late-stage base (#4) ⚠ Not actionable yet
55 setup score
RS Score 96
Trend template 8/8 ✓
CANSLIM 72.5* (B)
box top: 240.87 box bottom: 202.56 box height pct: 0.189 vol ratio: 0.968 is breakout: ✗ pct from 52w high: 0.0 validation reason: valid generic setup multi tf evaluated: ✓ multi tf reason: weekly: within 15% of 52-week high (Darvas box territory)
Why This Setup?
Darvas Box · schematic

Box: top=240.87, bottom=202.56, height=18.9%, breakout=no, vol_ratio=1.0x, 0% from 52w high | Strong trend (8/8) | Top RS (96) | Moderate pattern (65%) | Accumulation (2.1× up/dn vol) | Stage 2 | Readiness 53/100 (early) | CANSLIM 72.5 (B) | ⚠ Volatility widening into breakout; Late-stage base (#4); Not actionable yet

The Universal Edge Check · context only

What the setup still has going for it, recorded for later. The verdict above stands — these principles do not overrule it.

6/7 universals met
  • Volume confirms — partly met 1.0× average — light
  • A relative-strength leader — met RS rank 93
  • Asymmetric reward — met Met — levels are a Pro detail
  • Clear of earnings — met in 35 days
  • In a confirmed uptrend — met Stage 2 · Trend template 8/8
  • Not chasing (in range) — met Met — levels are a Pro detail
  • Risk is defined — met Met — levels are a Pro detail
Why these seven? → The Universal Edge

Minervini Trend Template

8/8 ✓

Grades the price structure — moving-average stacking, distance from the 52-week high/low, and relative strength above the ≥70 uptrend bar. This is the technical trend check; the company's fundamentals and ≥80 RS leadership are scored separately in the Grade Card.

Price above SMA 150 & 200 $222.08 vs SMA150 $163.53 / SMA200 $147.85
SMA 150 above SMA 200 SMA150 $163.53 vs SMA200 $147.85
SMA 200 trending up Slope +11.06 over 20 days
SMA 50 above SMA 150 & 200 SMA50 $203.72
Price above SMA 50 $222.08 vs SMA50 $203.72
30%+ above 52-week low +137.0% from $93.69
Within 25% of 52-week high -7.8% from $240.87
RS score above 70 RS 96

Fundamentals

52W Range
87%
Mkt Cap SEC
43.6B
EPS QoQ
+3%
Rev YoY
+6%
ROE
117%
Gross Margin
70%
D/E
3.11
EPS TTM
$6.35
P/E TTM
35.0x
Float
196M
Insider
No Buy

Company

Company profile
NetApp, Inc.
NTAP · NASDAQ · Electronic Technology · Computer Peripherals
O'Neil · Grade Card
CANSLIM — current EPS, annual EPS, new highs, supply, leader RS, inst. sponsorship, market
B 74.9* CANSLIM * disqualified on C, M
C · Curr. EPS
60
A · Annual EPS
100
N · New Highs
100
S · Supply/Demand
30
L · Leader RS
96
I · Inst. Spons.
100
M · Market
30

Weekly Context

Multi-timeframe signals from weekly bars
W. Trend
8/8
W. RS
100
W. Support
$107.24
W. Resist
$240.87
Weekly Structure

Scan History

20× streak
Oct 23: 87 (Trend Only)Oct 26: 88 (Trend Only)Oct 27: 80 (Partial Move)80
Oct 27
Partial Move ✓ Gate
80
Oct 26
Trend Only ✓ Gate
88 0.0%
Oct 23
Trend Only ✓ Gate
87 +3.1%

Latest News

Headlines for NTAP
Loading headlines…

Get the full picture on NTAP

Pro members see entry/stop/target levels, R:R ratios, intraday alerts, and every setup detected across 500+ symbols daily.

Start 7-Day Free Trial