Uptrend Under Pressure 100
Institutional selling is building — 7 distribution days in the last 25 sessions. Severe risk · 100/100 · 7 distribution days (SPY) Oct 26 Full briefing →
View
Simple research view

TQQQ

$68.43 +3.23% Oct 26 close
Detected setup Inverse Head & Shoulders · Setup Score 88/100

Stand aside — setup invalidated

Setup score 88, but price closes below stop $75.08 — stand aside until the condition resets.

Ask about TQQQ

Switch to Advanced for indicator panels, raw grades, provenance, drawing tools, and full technical tables.

$TQQQ

etf Stage 1 · Basing Base 1
$68.43 latest close
Market Structure
Trend structure: downtrend
Latest event: structure_shift (bearish)
Resistance 85.03–85.32 · 3 touches · moderate
Momentum Turn Watch
Bollinger Lower-Band Support Price ($68.43) is holding just above the lower Bollinger band ($64.02; %B 19) — support at the bottom of the bands.
Early technical context only. Wait for price, volume, and the canonical setup trigger to confirm; this signal does not change readiness or the setup score.
Join to Watchlist $TQQQ Share card
Historical record

No active setup in the latest scan — this page shows the last detection Legend AI made for $TQQQ. Every level, score and criterion below is computed from the Oct 26 close session (latest session), and may no longer hold.

Historical verdict · setup score 88/100 · data Oct 26 close · latest session

Stand aside — setup invalidated

Setup score 88, but price closes below stop $75.08 — stand aside until the condition resets.

Review six verdicts Inspect chart
Recent price action · daily
$70.00$80.00AugSepOct$68.43

What would change this verdict

What needs to turn for this to become buyable — the top failing checks across the legend council:

  • Minervini 1.1 Price > 150-day MA AND 200-day MA — Price $68.43, MA150 $70.14, MA200 $65.28
  • Minervini 1.5 Price > 50-day MA — Price $68.43 vs MA50 $73.93
  • O'Neil N: Near 52-week high or RS line new high — 22.3% below high | RS line new high: False
  • O'Neil S: Base tightness (ATR% ≤ 4.5%) — ATR% 5.52%
  • Weinstein Volume expansion above average — Volume ratio 1.00x
  • Dennis S1: 20-day Donchian breakout
Minority view — the council disagrees here
  • Minervini: avoid Trend-template read: fails Price > 150-day MA AND 200-day MA.
  • O'Neil: watch CANSLIM read: 1/6 pass; improvement is still needed.
  • Weinstein: watch Stage-analysis read: Stage 2 is present; 1 supporting checks need improvement.
75 Strong
Legend Score · rates the stock Strong (75/100) — held back by institutional footprint

Our proprietary 0-100 rating — the answer to Wall Street's black-box scores. Five pillars, each computed from real scan data, each explained below in plain English.

  • Relative Strength (25%) 89
  • Trend Template (25%) 100
  • Institutional Footprint (20%) 64
  • EPS Growth (15%) 50
  • Quality (SMR-like) (15%) 50

RS rank 88: beating most of the market. Trend template 8/8: price above rising 50/150/200-day lines — textbook uptrend structure. Institutional score 64: mild accumulation. No recent earnings growth data — scored neutral. No sales/ROE data — scored neutral. Updated 2026-10-14.

Price $68.43 +3.2% Oct 26 close
52W High $88.09 22.3% below high
Wks Since High 20w
Base Depth 34.6%
RS Rank 73 percentile of scan
SMA 50 $73.93
Avg Vol 51,371,054
Rel Vol (Oct 26) 1.00× 0.58× on up days
More stats
52W Low $37.32
Tight Wks 0
Base B1
SMA 200 $65.28
RS Line vs High -11.8%
RS Line Slope +12.4% ▲
ADR% 3.7%
ATR(14) $3.77 (5.5%)
Vol Pace (live) N/A
A/D Days 12A / 19D
A/D Rating E
VDU Bars 0/10 d
Position in 52-week range 61stpercentile of the 52-week range
$37.32low
$88.09high

TQQQ Chart

Interactive price, volume, RS, RSI, and MACD charts are available after sign in.

Create a free account to load the full interactive chart for TQQQ.

Create Free Account

Technical Analysis Report Card

$TQQQ · $68.43 · as of 2026-10-26 · multi-factor read
47
/ 100
Technicals 47/100
Reference read from price & volume only — the verdict at the top of the page decides the action.

Trend · Daily / Weekly / Monthly

Daily ▬ Sideways / consolidating
Weekly ▬ Sideways / consolidating
Monthly ▬ Sideways / consolidating

Moving Averages

50-day$73.93 ↓
100-day$73.61 ↓
200-day$65.28 ↑
Bullish (50 > 200)

RSI (14)

Reading40.0 · Bearish

Bearish momentum — sellers in control.

MACD (12/26/9)

StateBearish
Histogram-1.401

Bearish — MACD below its signal line and below zero. Histogram expanding.

Bollinger Bands (20,2)

%B / Width19% · 31.2%

Near the lower band — under pressure or oversold.

Volume · Buyer vs Seller

Up/Down vol0.58 · Distribution
Rel volume1.0×
Pocket pivots · 10d0
5d vs 50d vol121%
Heavy vol up / down0 / 3

Distribution — volume is concentrated on down days; sellers dominate. Recent volume is expanding versus its baseline.

  • 3 heavy-volume down days vs 0 up in the last 20 sessions — supply is showing.

Support & Resistance

R · $74.18swing level
R · $76.33swing level
R · $77.90swing level
Price · $68.43now
S · $68.09swing level
S · $66.67swing level
S · $57.59swing level

Fibonacci · Downtrend swing

23.6%$64.79
38.2% ◄ price here$69.24
50.0%$72.84
61.8%$76.44
78.6%$81.56

Retracement resistance zones measured from the recent swing high down to the low.

The verdict is free. The trade plan is Pro.
Unlock the exact entry, stop-loss, profit target, and reward-to-risk for TQQQ — plus the full 500+ symbol scanner and Ask-the-Legends chat.
Start your 7-day free trial →
Above 200-day MA50/200 bullishVolume distributionRS 88 (leader)
Want this read in a legend's voice? Ask a Legend about TQQQ
Generic technical analysis generated mechanically from price & volume — educational research only, not financial advice or a personalized recommendation. Levels are illustrative; confirm on your own chart. New to these terms? →
Legend Verdicts 6 methodology checks

Who would consider this setup, why it qualifies, and what blocks it — calculated from the same deterministic methodology rules used across Legend AI.
How to read the numbers: the setup score (88/100, in the verdict band) rates this trade setup. Each legend's A–D grade rates the same setup against that legend's own checklist — so a high score next to a C grade is not a contradiction. The setup can be strong without fitting that legend's style. When the council disagrees, the verdict band breaks the tie.

Council consensus: 7 of 9 legends are Watching — building, not yet a confirmed buy.
Minervini Avoid B Trend-template read: fails Price > 150-day MA AND 200-day MA.
Passing evidence
1.2 150-day MA > 200-day MAMA150 $70.14 vs MA200 $65.28
1.4 50-day MA > 150-day MA AND 200-day MAMA50 $73.93, MA150 $70.14, MA200 $65.28
Failing evidence
1.1 Price > 150-day MA AND 200-day MAPrice $68.43, MA150 $70.14, MA200 $65.28
1.5 Price > 50-day MAPrice $68.43 vs MA50 $73.93
Not applicable
2. Quarterly EPS growth ≥ 25%No single-company earnings — not applicable to ETFs
2. ROE ≥ 17%No single-company earnings — not applicable to ETFs
2. Revenue growth ≥ 20% YoYNo single-company earnings — not applicable to ETFs
7/9 checks
Method → Playbook → Ask →
O'Neil Watch D CANSLIM read: 1/6 pass; improvement is still needed.

partialInverse Head & Shoulders still forming — ideal buy point at $78.81 on big volume. CANSLIM 66.

Passing evidence
L: RS rank ≥ 80 (IBD leadership)RS rank 88
Failing evidence
N: Near 52-week high or RS line new high22.3% below high | RS line new high: False
S: Base tightness (ATR% ≤ 4.5%)ATR% 5.52%
Not applicable
C: Quarterly EPS acceleration ≥ 25%No single-company earnings — not applicable to ETFs
A: Annual earnings & revenue qualityNo single-company earnings — not applicable to ETFs
1/6 checks
Method → Playbook → Ask →
Weinstein Watch B Stage-analysis read: Stage 2 is present; 1 supporting checks need improvement.

mediumClassic Stage 2 advancing phase — strong weekly trend confirms uptrend. This is Weinstein's sweet spot: buy and hold while price remains above the 30-week MA.

Passing evidence
Stage 2 (Advancing phase) confirmedStage 2 (Advancing)
Price above 30-week MA (200-day proxy)Price $68.43 vs MA200 $65.28
Failing evidence
Volume expansion above averageVolume ratio 1.00x
6/7 checks
Method → Playbook → Ask →
dennis Watch C Turtle read: no Donchian signal. The system stays flat until price takes out the 20-day high.
Passing evidence
No breakdown below the 20-day channel20-day low $65.37
Volatility-unit sizing (1N ≈ 1% of equity)1N = $3.39 (4.96% of price); the Turtles size 1 unit so a 1N move ≈ 1% of equity, making the 2N stop ≈ 2% equity risk
Failing evidence
S1: 20-day Donchian breakoutNot confirmed
S2: 55-day Donchian breakoutNot confirmed
5/7 checks
Method → Playbook → Ask →
zanger Avoid C Zanger read: a hard gate is broken — either the pattern is not one of his six, or the entry is more than 5% past the breakout. He would not touch this.
Passing evidence
Not extended (≤5% above the breakout point)Measured as passing
Partial-profit plan: sell 20-30% at +15-20%Scale 20-30% at $78.69-$82.12; trail the rest
Failing evidence
Named Zanger pattern onlyInverse Head & Shoulders is not one of Zanger's six
Breakout volume 1.5-2.0x averageData unavailable
4/6 checks
Method → Playbook → Ask →
zweig Watch A Zweig read: passes his full growth screen — earnings growing faster than the market, a price that is reasonable for that growth, insiders buying, and price strength. Super Model timing — timing tailwinds: Breadth momentum, 4% Model (breadth proxy); 2 timing leg(s) lack data.
Passing evidence
Price strength (RS ≥ 70)RS score 88 — Zweig buys strength, not bargains
Breadth momentum: 10-day A/D ratio10-day A/D 1.17 (2025 adv / 1725 dec) — participation expanding
Failing evidence
Monetary conditions: don't fight the FedFed series stored but too thin to read direction
9-to-1 up/down volume daysOnly 17 breadth sessions stored — need 20+ to spot thrust days
Not applicable
EPS growth above the marketNo single-company earnings — not applicable to ETFs
Reasonable price for the growthNo single-company earnings — not applicable to ETFs
Insider buyingNo single-company earnings — not applicable to ETFs
3/5 checks
Method → Playbook → Ask →
Livermore Watch B Pivotal-point read: constructive evidence is present, but volume vs average is unresolved.

mediumTrend is your friend. Inverse Head & Shoulders continuation — trade in the direction of least resistance. RS score 88.

Passing evidence
Price$68.43
Relative strengthRS 88
Failing evidence
Volume vs average1.00x
Pivotal point cleared on expanding volumeNot confirmed
4/6 checks
Method → Playbook → Ask →
Darvas Watch B Box-theory read: constructive evidence is present, but volume vs average is unresolved.

partialConsolidating within the box (10.5% from 52W high) — patience until it approaches the prior high.

Passing evidence
Price$68.43
Relative strengthRS 88
Failing evidence
Volume vs average1.00x
Box top broken on heavy volumeNot confirmed
4/6 checks
Method → Playbook → Ask →
Wyckoff Watch B Supply-and-demand read: constructive evidence is present, but volume vs average is unresolved.
Passing evidence
Price$68.43
Relative strengthRS 88
Failing evidence
Volume vs average1.00x
Sign of Strength confirmed on expanding volumePrice hasn't cleared the pivot yet — confirmation pending
4/6 checks
Method → Playbook → Ask →
Base & Breakout
Breakout follow-through

No active breakout tracked — Legend AI monitors daily for pivot-point breaks. What's a breakout?

Unlock Base & Breakout Tracking
RS Line vs SPY 52-week relative strength · blue = RS line · dashed = MA50 · dot = NH ▲ Rising
105RS Line (52W)
Accumulation / Distribution last 65 sessions · green = acc on high vol · red = dist on high vol Net -8 E
A: 12 D: 20 Net: -865 sessions
Minervini · Grade Card
Fundamentals & leadership quality — Minervini’s published criteria · 2/3 met · earnings criteria N/A for ETFs
A 2/3 criteria
Separate score from the Minervini Trend Template (6/8): the Trend Template grades the price structure, this grades the company & leadership (earnings, sales, margins, RS rank). A stock can ride a clean trend while its fundamentals lag, so the two often differ by design — they are not the same checklist.
– EPS acceleration ≥25% QoQ N/A
– Revenue growth ≥20% YoY N/A
– Gross margin ≥30% N/A
– ROE ≥17% N/A
✓ RS rating ≥80 (leadership) 88
✗ Stage 2 uptrend (Weinstein) Stage 1
✓ Within 25% of 52W high -22.3%

Method Playbook

Trade it like Wyckoff EXACT LEVELS · PRO
Wyckoff B · Watch — The deterministic methodology check is Watch; wait for the failing or incomplete criteria to improve before the trigger can qualify.
Pivot
Pro level
Published-method rule: Use the Spring/test, Sign of Strength, creek, or Last Point of Support boundary identified by the active structure.
Evidence: Canonical setup geometry is available with Pro.
Entry trigger
Pro level
Published-method rule: Require a completed test or Sign of Strength/Last Point of Support confirmation with improving demand versus supply.
Evidence: Canonical setup geometry is available with Pro.
Initial stop
Pro level
Published-method rule: Start below the Spring/test low or structural support whose failure would invalidate the accumulation read.
Evidence: Canonical setup geometry is available with Pro.
Trail
Rule-based
Published-method rule: Raise protection beneath successive Last Points of Support or meaningful higher lows during markup; never loosen it.
Evidence: Planned management rule; no stored stop or broker order is changed automatically.
Exit / invalidation
Pro level
Published-method rule: Exit on a failed Sign of Strength, support loss, or clear supply-dominant reversal such as an upthrust failure.
Evidence: Canonical setup geometry is available with Pro.
Deterministic educational plan, not a recommendation. No order or stop is changed automatically. Method and sources →

Forming Patterns (predictive — not confirmed)

Head & Shoulders bearish forming
75% built

Possible head & shoulders top — not confirmed. Watch for a daily close below ~57.59 (neckline) to confirm, with measured-move risk toward ~27.09. A push back above 85.32 weakens the pattern; reclaiming 88.09 invalidates it.

Confirms below 57.59
Invalidates at 88.09
Left Shoulder 79.68
Head 88.09
Right Shoulder 85.32
Neckline 57.59
Target 27.09

LS 79.68 / head 88.09 / RS 85.32, neckline ~57.59, vol_fading=yes

Predictive pattern recognition is educational — most forming structures never confirm. Wait for the confirmation level before treating this as a setup.

Pattern Analysis (historical)

Inverse Head & Shoulders
88 setup score
RS Score 88
Trend template 6/8
CANSLIM 66.2* (B)
left shoulder: 64.91 head: 57.59 right shoulder: 67.93 shoulder symmetry: 0.045 prior decline: 0.346 sessions since breakout: 16 breakout volume ratio: 1.139 retest: ✓ confirmed via right armpit: ✓ validation reason: valid inverse head-and-shoulders multi tf evaluated: ✓ multi tf reason: weekly trend template 8/8 confirmed
Why This Setup?
Inverse Head & Shoulders · schematic

Inverse H&S breakout: LS 64.91, head 57.59, RS 67.93, neckline 77.90, breakout 16 bars ago, vol 1.14x (confirmed via right armpit) | Strong trend (8/8) | Top RS (88) | High-confidence pattern (86%) | Power Trend | Stage 2 | Readiness 77/100 (watch) | CANSLIM 66.2 (B)

Ask a Legend ▾
The Universal Edge Check · context only

What the setup still has going for it, recorded for later. The verdict above stands — these principles do not overrule it.

4/7 universals met
  • A relative-strength leader — partly met RS rank 73 — middling
  • Clear of earnings — partly met Report date unknown
  • Volume confirms — partly met 0.8× average — light
  • Asymmetric reward — met Met — levels are a Pro detail
  • In a confirmed uptrend — met Stage 1 · Trend template 6/8
  • Not chasing (in range) — met Met — levels are a Pro detail
  • Risk is defined — met Met — levels are a Pro detail
Why these seven? → The Universal Edge

Minervini Trend Template

6/8

Grades the price structure — moving-average stacking, distance from the 52-week high/low, and relative strength above the ≥70 uptrend bar. This is the technical trend check; the company's fundamentals and ≥80 RS leadership are scored separately in the Grade Card.

Price above SMA 150 & 200 $68.43 vs SMA150 $70.14 / SMA200 $65.28
SMA 150 above SMA 200 SMA150 $70.14 vs SMA200 $65.28
SMA 200 trending up Slope +2.21 over 20 days
SMA 50 above SMA 150 & 200 SMA50 $73.93
Price above SMA 50 $68.43 vs SMA50 $73.93
30%+ above 52-week low +83.4% from $37.32
Within 25% of 52-week high -22.3% from $88.09
RS score above 70 RS 88

Fundamentals

52W Range
61%
Insider
No Buy

Company

Company profile
TQQQ
TQQQ
Track all markets on TradingView
O'Neil · Grade Card
ETF checklist — N, S, L, M only
B 66.2* CANSLIM * disqualified on M
C · Curr. EPS
N/A
A · Annual EPS
N/A
N · New Highs
40
S · Supply/Demand
70
L · Leader RS
88
I · Inst. Spons.
N/A
M · Market
30
ETFs hold baskets of stocks — earnings and insider criteria don't apply. This grades new highs, supply/demand, relative-strength leadership, and market direction instead.

Weekly Context

Multi-timeframe signals from weekly bars
W. Trend
8/8
W. RS
97
W. Support
$48.46
W. Resist
$88.09
Weekly Structure

Scan History

Oct 12: 91 (Inverse Head & Shoulders)Oct 13: 92 (Cup & Handle)Oct 14: 88 (Inverse Head & Shoulders)88
Oct 14
Inverse Head & Shoulders ✓ Gate
88
Oct 13
Cup & Handle ✓ Gate
92 -13.2%
Oct 12
Inverse Head & Shoulders ✓ Gate
91 -14.0%

Latest News

Headlines for TQQQ
Loading headlines…

Get the full picture on TQQQ

Pro members see entry/stop/target levels, R:R ratios, intraday alerts, and every setup detected across 500+ symbols daily.

Start 7-Day Free Trial