Head & Shoulders TopPossible head & shoulders top — not confirmed. Watch for a daily close below ~1530.64 (neckline) to confirm, with measured-move risk toward ~1061.32. A push back above 1896.35 weakens the pattern; reclaiming 1999.96 invalidates it.
Bearish structure on the daily chart — a heads-up for anyone holding, not a short signal. Does not affect the bullish setup score.
Market Structure
Trend structure:range
Latest event:structure_shift(bullish)
Support
1406.50–1413.28
· 3 touches · moderate
Support
1378.30–1385.72
· 3 touches · moderate
Momentum Turn Watch
Bollinger Lower-Band SupportPrice ($1590.90) is holding just above the lower Bollinger band ($1522.34; %B 17) — support at the bottom of the bands.
Early technical context only. Wait for price, volume, and the canonical setup trigger to confirm; this signal does not change readiness or the setup score.
Triggers when price crosses your target during market hours or after the next daily scan. Delivered via email and Telegram (if linked in Account).
Historical record
No active setup in the latest scan — this page shows the last detection Legend AI made for $ASML.
Every level, score and criterion below is computed from the Oct 26 close session (latest session), and may no longer hold.
Historical verdict · setup score 82/100 · data Oct 26 close · latest session
Stand aside — setup invalidated
Setup score 82, but price closes below stop $1,768.09 — stand aside until the condition resets.
Weinstein: buyableStage-analysis read: Stage 2 with 7/7 measured criteria passing.
70Strong
Legend Score · rates the stockStrong (70/100) — held back by eps growth
Our proprietary 0-100 rating — the answer to Wall Street's black-box scores. Five pillars, each computed from real scan data, each explained below in plain English.
Relative Strength (25%)86
Trend Template (25%)100
Institutional Footprint (20%)64
EPS Growth (15%)30
Quality (SMR-like) (15%)45
RS rank 85: beating most of the market. Trend template 8/8: price above rising 50/150/200-day lines — textbook uptrend structure. Institutional score 64: mild accumulation. EPS up +0% — growing, but below the 25% leadership bar. Quality 45: weak fundamentals (sales growth 30, return on equity 42, leverage 100).
Updated 2026-10-13.
Earnings
Normal technical setup
Next earnings
Wednesday, July 15, 2026Report time not confirmed by the source
Deterministic evidence
ASML+1.22%
Semiconductor proxy · SMH+2.74%
Broad market · SPY+0.71%
Same completed session window ending 2026-10-26.
ASML was -1.52 points vs SMH.
+0.51 points vs SPY.
Session internals
Mixed
Rule: direction and internals disagree — it met neither the strong nor the weak rule. Judged on internals, not on the size of the move.
Vs prior close+1.22%From the open+0.18%Range position28%GapNo gap
Price bars, sourced event fields, and benchmark math only. This can adjust displayed short-term conviction; it does not change the stored scanner score or readiness.
Generic technical analysis generated mechanically from price & volume — educational research only, not financial advice or a personalized recommendation. Levels are illustrative; confirm on your own chart. New to these terms? →
Legend Verdicts6 methodology checks
Who would consider this setup, why it qualifies, and what blocks it — calculated from the same deterministic methodology rules used across Legend AI. How to read the numbers: the setup score (82/100, in the verdict band) rates this trade setup. Each legend's A–D grade rates the same setup against that legend's own checklist — so a high score next to a C grade is not a contradiction. The setup can be strong without fitting that legend's style. When the council disagrees, the verdict band breaks the tie.
Council consensus:
1 legend rates this Buyable · 6 watching · 2 avoid.
MinerviniAvoidCTrend-template read: fails Price > 150-day MA AND 200-day MA.
partialRule check says AVOID (9/13 checks passed) — Trend-template read: fails Price > 150-day MA AND 200-day MA.
Passing evidence
✓1.2 150-day MA > 200-day MAMA150 $1656.40 vs MA200 $1589.97
✓1.4 50-day MA > 150-day MA AND 200-day MAMA50 $1717.67, MA150 $1656.40, MA200 $1589.97
Failing evidence
✕1.1 Price > 150-day MA AND 200-day MAPrice $1590.90, MA150 $1656.40, MA200 $1589.97
✕1.5 Price > 50-day MAPrice $1590.90 vs MA50 $1717.67
WeinsteinBuyableAStage-analysis read: Stage 2 with 7/7 measured criteria passing.
highClassic Stage 2 advancing phase — strong weekly trend confirms uptrend. This is Weinstein's sweet spot: buy and hold while price remains above the 30-week MA.
dennisWatchBTurtle read: no Donchian signal. The system stays flat until price takes out the 20-day high.
Passing evidence
✓No breakdown below the 20-day channel20-day low $1,550.00
✓Volatility-unit sizing (1N ≈ 1% of equity)1N = $55.33 (3.48% of price); the Turtles size 1 unit so a 1N move ≈ 1% of equity, making the 2N stop ≈ 2% equity risk
zangerWatchBZanger read: the structure is fine but the breakout quality is not there yet — wait for 150%+ volume on the break.
partialZanger would buy the Ascending Triangle breakout only with 150-200% volume, never more than 5% above the breakout point, with a 2-3% stop set at entry. His edge over O'Neil is the exit plan: sell 20-30% of the position at +15-20%, then trail the rest on the 10/20-day moving average.
Passing evidence
✓Named Zanger pattern onlyAscending Triangle
✓Not extended (≤5% above the breakout point)Measured as passing
zweigWatchDZweig read: part of his screen passes but not all: EPS growth above the market (≥15% QoQ); Reasonable price for the growth (P/E ≤ 35); Insider buying — wait for the full growth screen before treating this as a Zweig setup.
Fundamentals & leadership quality — Minervini’s published criteria · 4/7 met
B
4/7 criteria
Separate score from the Minervini Trend Template (6/8): the Trend Template grades the price structure, this grades the company & leadership (earnings, sales, margins, RS rank). A stock can ride a clean trend while its fundamentals lag, so the two often differ by design — they are not the same checklist.
Darvas B · Watch — The deterministic methodology check is Watch; wait for the failing or incomplete criteria to improve before the trigger can qualify.
Pivot
Pro level
Published-method rule: Use the top of the active Darvas box near the high as the mechanical breakout boundary. Evidence: Canonical setup geometry is available with Pro.
Entry trigger
Pro level
Published-method rule: Require price to clear the box top with volume confirmation; movement inside the box remains observation, not a trigger. Evidence: Canonical setup geometry is available with Pro.
Initial stop
Pro level
Published-method rule: Start below the active box support or the canonical structural stop that proves the breakout failed. Evidence: Canonical setup geometry is available with Pro.
Trail
Rule-based
Published-method rule: As higher boxes form, raise the stop beneath the newest confirmed box floor; the stop moves up only. Evidence: Planned management rule; no stored stop or broker order is changed automatically.
Exit / invalidation
Pro level
Published-method rule: Exit when price breaks the active box floor or decisively falls back through the breakout structure. Evidence: Canonical setup geometry is available with Pro.
Deterministic educational plan, not a recommendation. No order or stop is changed automatically. Method and sources →
Possible head & shoulders top — not confirmed. Watch for a daily close below ~1530.64 (neckline) to confirm, with measured-move risk toward ~1061.32. A push back above 1896.35 weakens the pattern; reclaiming 1999.96 invalidates it.
Confirms below1530.64
Invalidates at1999.96
Left Shoulder1959.04
Head1999.96
Right Shoulder1896.35
Neckline1530.64
Target1061.32
LS 1959.04 / head 1999.96 / RS 1896.35, neckline ~1530.64, vol_fading=yes
Predictive pattern recognition is educational — most forming structures never confirm. Wait for the confirmation level before treating this as a setup.
Pattern Analysis (historical)
Ascending Triangle
Historical replay: +20% before −8% within 40 sessions: 10% (n=151) · source bars 2024-11-01–2026-10-26 · avg -0.2% per setup (-0.02R)
⚠ 3rd-stage base
Grades the price structure — moving-average stacking, distance from the 52-week high/low, and relative strength above the ≥70 uptrend bar. This is the technical trend check; the company's fundamentals and ≥80 RS leadership are scored separately in the Grade Card.
✗
Price above SMA 150 & 200$1590.90 vs SMA150 $1656.40 / SMA200 $1589.97
✓
SMA 150 above SMA 200SMA150 $1656.40 vs SMA200 $1589.97